Clinically Vulnerable Families πŸ’™πŸ’œπŸ’— Profile picture
Jan 21, 2025 β€’ 23 tweets β€’ 8 min read β€’ Read on X
🚨Dame Kate Bingham🚨
Dubbed the "hero in a pink jacket πŸ’•"

On Evusheld:
"I felt very strongly [.]. We were following a very clear 2 tier strategy where the CV immunocompromised were being deprioritised [.] I felt that was *manifestly* wrong both ethically and morally [.]"
1/🧡
The above video was taken out of sequence. The below should give more context...

KB "So actually, the first goal was around protecting the UK population."

CTI [Hugo Keith KC]
"Do you think you succeeded on securing or making available those monoclonal antibodies?"

KB "No!"
2/
Kate goes on to make the argument that by not protecting this population, we were also promoting viral mutation and the evolution of variants.

3/
On funding, clinical trials, and onshore manufacturing. We need long-term planning and strategy.

KB "We don't have that level of capability or long-term thinking in government."

4/
On the inclusion of therapeutics within the remit of the Vaccine Taskforce:

KB "It was quite clear that there was 'open warfare' between BEIS [Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy] and the Department for Health"

5/
CTI "If you had brought [.] therapeutics within the remit of the VTF, you might have ended up dividing your attention [.] You would have been less able to focus ruthlessly on the question of identifying, procuring, and making available vaccines [.]"

KB "Correct"
6/
KB "I felt strongly that we should have governance over the neutralising antibodies because there are a portion on people in the UK who are immunocompromised."

"It was part of our original mandate."

"to protect all those people *including* the immunocompromised."

7/
She goes on to explain the difference between the antibodies and how Evusheld was designed to last longer to dose every 6m minimum. Other antibodies, designed as treatments, only last around 1 month.

8/
If the VTF had taken on antivirals, Kate believes that they could have made treatments available more rapidly, and they might have been more effective. However, she would have required a larger team.

9/
CTI "Did you ever get the impression during your time in the VTF that the issue of prophylactic development was being left behind, being made to be a second-class citizen?"

KB " I absolutely felt that, yes. From late October 2020."

10/
The JCVI identified *30 MILLION* people who were deemed to be Clinically Vulnerable (at that time):

πŸ’™All adults over 50
πŸ’œThose under 50 with severe underlying disease

Kate described it as an "enhanced 'flu cohort"

11/
"Immediately" in May 2020, the VTF were aware of the development of Evusheld.

12/
KB "We initially signed a [.] letter of intent, but non-binding for a million doses of their long acting antibody cocktail [.] expected to have a 6m effect."

13/
1 million doses of Evusheld =

2 doses spread over 1 year
OR
1 dose per winter for 2 winters

"The numbers of immunocompromised people [500k] were data that had come from the Department of Health."

14/
AZ couldn't supply this order, as they had 2.5M doses for the world.

They then asked what was the minimum order to protect the immunocompromised population.

15/
The CMOs suggested no more than 50,000 if there was a political will.

Ultimately, no prophylactic treatment has *ever* been purchased to protect this, our most vulnerable, population.

16/
KB "I felt very strongly [.]. We were following a very clear 2 tier strategy where the CV immunocompromised were being deprioritised [.] 1 felt that was *manifestly* wrong both ethically and morally [.]"

17/
KB " It did not follow the goal that we had been set, which was to protect the entire population."

18/
Important comparison between the attitude to procuring vaccines vs. prophylactic treatments for people who are not sufficiently protected by vaccines.

19/
CTI suggests that the cost of Evusheld was not the reason for the decision against.

Kate quotes JVT, "I consider cost, including cost effectiveness and practicality considerations to be entirely rational factors when making decisions on neutralising Ab procurement."

20/
🧨πŸ’₯

Thank you πŸ’• @katebingham2 πŸ’•

"The fact that the vaccine rollout had been effective doesn't stop people without an immune system getting infected."

21/
The decision about purchasing Evusheld was ultimately with ministers.

22/
Kate Bingham on that lack of purchase of Evusheld:

"I just think that it was the wrong decision."

23/

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Clinically Vulnerable Families πŸ’™πŸ’œπŸ’—

Clinically Vulnerable Families πŸ’™πŸ’œπŸ’— Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cv_cev

Apr 30
πŸ”Š Calling all UK COβ‚‚ monitor owners
AND any helpful UK voters

PLEASE REPOST ♻️ ❀️ and tag others!

πŸ™ Can you *please* help us at the local elections next Thursday?
- Even if you don't own one, we still need your help!

1/🧡
<Read our new article - next post> HELP AUDIT  VENTILATION  FOR OUR ACCESSIBILITY SURVEY OF  THE LOCAL ELECTIONS  YOUR VOICE.  CLEAN AIR.  BETTER SPACES.  CO  SPOT IT.  Use a COβ‚‚ monitor to check air quality.  RECORD IT.  Share what you find.  Help make public spaces healthier for everyone.  COβ‚‚  1113  PPM  21  TOGETHER,  WE CAN BREATHE BETTER!  Clinically Vulnerable Families
Last year, your evidence helped us change the Electoral Commission guidance for assisting Clinically Vulnerable voters - which has improved safety for everyone.

This year, we NEED YOUR HELP - to audit whether the guidance has worked. πŸ™

2/
Read more πŸ‘‡
clinicallyvulnerable.org/post/2026-loca…
1. 🌬️ BRING YOUR COβ‚‚ MONITOR
- if you have one!

Take the indoor reading of COβ‚‚ (in ppm) ideally at head height, 50cm away from people, leaving over 30 seconds to settle.

Remember the number... you need it later!

3/ #MyMaskMyVote Image of a CO2 monitor. Signage for polling station visible behind.  However, this was taken *outside* of a polling station immediately after being inside. This is not how to measure CO2! It is for illustrative purposes only.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 10
Let this sink in...

πŸš‘ HEALTHY adults vaccinated against Covid Sept - Dec 2025 reduced their likelihood of emergency and urgent care visits by 50%.

🏨 Hospitalisations were reduced by 55%

(compared with those not vaccinated)
1/🧡 Image
The UK has not shared data from 2025. But for CV people it is much worse:

2024 JCVI data showed that vaccines reduced hospitalisations for Clinically Vulnerable people by 45%.

They published it!
...then removed millions with health conditions from eligibility!

2/ Image
45% may sound lower.
But if your baseline is 2-12x more likely to be hospitalised from Covid, a 45% reduction in risk prevents 2-12x more hospitalisations per dose.

The JCVI removed high-risk groups on cost-effectiveness grounds.
But the cost-effectiveness case is stronger!

3/
Read 12 tweets
Mar 29
The government just published its Pandemic Preparedness Strategy.

TLDR: Some welcome commitments inc. on ventilation. But Clinically Vulnerable people are still not clearly defined or automatically protected, and the prioritisation framework won't arrive until 2027.

1/🧡 Department of Health & Social Care  Pandemic Preparedness Strategy: building our capabilities  Published 25 March 2026
What's new?

Published 25 March 2026, this is the UK's first major pandemic strategy since Covid.

It covers all 4 nations, sets out 12 principles and detailed action plans to 2030, backed by around Β£1 billion of investment.

But what about the detail...?

2/
They know another pandemic is coming... and epidemics are also a risk.

The question is:
Will Clinically Vulnerable families be protected when it does?

- This document raises the question more than it answers it.

3/ While pandemics of this scale are rare, major epidemics are far more common and milder  pandemics still cause significant damage. A future pandemic is a certainty - we just don’t  know when it will happen or what will cause it. It would most likely be caused by a virus,  though it could also be caused by bacteria or fungi. It could be spread by one or more of  the routes of infection transmission, with the 5 main transmission routes being: β€’ respiratory β€’ oral β€’ blood or sexual β€’ touch 1 Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and DHSC’s DHSC and ONS: direct and indirect health impacts  o...
Read 20 tweets
Mar 25
πŸ“‰ Kent MenB outbreak

⚠️East Kent Trust failed to report their first case for 2 days⚠️

Here's what you need to know.
TLDR: Peaked 13th March. No new cases since - with reporting delays, but that's even better news than it sounds.
1/🧡 πŸ‘‡ @laurabundock @SkyNews
THE OUTBREAK IS DECLINING but understates how well that's going. πŸ“‰

The earliest case became unwell on 9th March, with the latest on 16th March, and the peak was 13th March.

2/
Cases take time to be confirmed and reported.

The fact that nothing new has surfaced in the data as of 23rd March - despite the reporting lag - means the real-world situation is almost certainly better than the numbers show.

3/ Image of bar chart  Figure 2. Cases of invasive meningococcal disease in Kent outbreak, by case category, outbreak bacterial subtype: serotype P1.12-1,16-183, attendance at Club Chemistry, and date of onset (data as of 23 March 2026)  6  5-  4  Number of cases  3  2  1-  0  07 Mar  09 Mar  11 Mar  13 Mar  15 Mar  17 Mar  19 Mar  21 Mar  23 Mar  Date of onset  Confirmed outbreak strain  Confirmed  Probable  Attended Club Chemistry  Includes 17 Confirmed - outbreak strain and 3 Confirmed and 2 Probable case(s). Excludes 1 Probable case with missing date information.
Read 15 tweets
Mar 18
Meningitis
* Important thread for those who prefer balanced and factual information *

In order to understand risk we need to break down a few things....

🦠Risk from the bacteria
πŸ’™πŸ’œπŸ’— Individual risk
πŸŽ“ Environmental risks
1/
The Kent outbreak is predominantly MenB (Group B). This is a serious infection - and potentially an adapted strain - investigations are ongoing...

Bacterial meningitis is rare but more severe than viral, and up to 1 in 10 cases of bacterial meningitis in the UK is fatal.

2/
MenB isn't new. There are around 300 cases of MenB per year in the UK, even with vaccination programmes.

What's unusual is the cluster - multiple cases linked to a single location in a short window. It has now spread to a student at a second university in Canterbury, Kent.
3/
Read 9 tweets
Mar 5
UK COVID INQUIRY - CVFπŸ’™πŸ’œπŸ’—
@AdamWagner1 Closing Submissions

The Covid Inquiry has good ventilation protocols (as advised by CVF at the start of the Inquiry) including HEPA filters.

Under 1000ppm is therefore the safe threshold ( but without it would be under 800ppm).

1/
We need to understand airborne transmission in order to make all indoor environments safer for everyone, and especially for Clinically Vulnerable people.

2/
The need for Clinically Vulnerable people to have:

Safety
Support
& Status

3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(