ChrisO_wiki Profile picture
Jan 23 4 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/ It's a joke, I know, but there's a nugget of truth here: until 1914 the North Sea was generally known in English as the German Ocean. The name "North Sea" was sometimes reserved for the Atlantic north of Shetland (which is now generally known as the Norwegian Sea). Image
2/ The British renaming of the German Ocean wasn't simply a unilateral creation of a new name, however - the term 'North Sea' had already been in use for centuries by the Dutch, who originally named it in opposition to the "South Sea" (off Frisia, the modern Wadden Sea).
3/ Ironically, the Germans themselves didn't use the term "German Ocean" but followed the Dutch and Danes in calling it the Nordzee. So although the British change of name was political, it simply brought the naming into line with its North Sea neighbours.
4/ This is obviously a very different scenario from Trump's unilateral imposition of the "Gulf of America", a name with no historical precedents as far as I know. Even Hitler was following historical naming when he unilaterally renamed Austria as 'Ostmark' in 1938. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChrisO_wiki

ChrisO_wiki Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisO_wiki

Jan 22
1/ Russian artillerymen are reportedly having significant problems with inconsistently filled propelling charges for shells, which is undermining their accuracy and range, but have been forbidden by the Russian General Staff from trying to fix the problem themselves. ⬇️ Image
2/ The 'Philologist in ambush' Telegram channel reports that "complaints continue to come from artillerymen about the quality of ammunition, including the floating weight of gunpowder charges."
3/ "That is, the problem with the weight of gunpowder remains, and artillerymen are forced to continue to weigh gunpowder charges in order to somehow ensure more or less acceptable accuracy."
Read 16 tweets
Jan 21
1/ Elon Musk's instantly-notorious Nazi salute yesterday appears to have sparked a further exodus of users from X/Twitter. Tesla may also be in trouble, according to the Financial Times. ⬇️
2/ A review of recent follower counts shows that there has been a significant spike in people abandoning X in the last 24 hours. This is visible in my own follower count, as well as those of widely disparate accounts.
3/ Comparing my figures with those of @PaddingtonBear, @NASCAR and @YellowstoneNPS, the same trend is visible of a sudden drop in follower accounts at the same time as Musk's infamous appearance at the Trump inauguration rally in Washington, D.C. yesterday. @ChrisO_wiki follower count
@PaddingtonBear follower count
@NASCAR follower count
@YellowstoneNPS follower count
Read 9 tweets
Jan 21
1/ The Russian neo-Nazi group Rusich has warned that the Russian army faces the collapse of its combat capabilities if the war in Ukraine ends, due to the mass return to civilian life of mobilised personnel. It advises Putin to keep the war going to avoid this scenario. ⬇️ Image
2/ Rusich advocates eight criteria for 'victory' in Ukraine:

"1. Stand with troops along the Dnipro;

2. Take Odessa (land route to Transnistria);

3. Ukraine's refusal of any alliances with NATO;

4. Limitation of the Ukrainian Armed Forces in numbers and weapons;
3/ "5. Extradition of SBU and HUR documents, extradition to Russia of employees of these special services who are involved in terrorist attacks on the territory of the Russian Federation;

6. Extradition of Russian citizens who participated in the war against Russia;
Read 25 tweets
Jan 21
1/ Secret negotiations between representatives of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin reportedly failed in December 2024 due to unacceptable conditions from the American side, with China said to be playing a role as a spoiler to obtain economic advantage for itself. ⬇️ AI-generated image of Donald Trump meeting Vladimir Putin with Winnie-the-Pooh sitting between them and the Chinese flag in the background
2/ The VChK-OGPU Telegram channel reports that talks took place between Trump and Putin representatives late last year, despite denials from the Russian side when the news was leaked. However, the negotiations proved unsuccessful, according to a source.
bbc.com/news/articles/…
3/ "Back in the early days of the Special Military Operation an informal working group on the situation in the economy and finance was organised under the first person of the country [i.e. Putin] from sensible, but completely loyal and dependent on the existing regime, people…
Read 23 tweets
Jan 21
1/ Powerful figures in the Russian government apparatus are reportedly becoming increasingly unhappy with the government's subservient relationship with China, which is seen as "turning the country into a raw materials colony" and threatening an economic crisis. ⬇️ Image
2/ The VChK-OGPU Telegram channel has an interesting piece about concerns within "government clans of the Russian Federation" about Putin's strategy towards China, which is being promoted by a "dominant pro-Chinese group".
3/ According to a source, "the failure of the policy of the last two years and the impossibility of getting out of the [Ukraine] conflict on terms acceptable to the dominant group became obvious – …
Read 12 tweets
Jan 21
1/ It's worth noting that Trump's birthright citizenship executive executive order includes a clause that could lead to Kamala Harris being stripped of her citizenship. Image
2/ Here's the relevant part of the text. It applies not only to undocumented immigrants, but to those on temporary resident permits, such as student visas. Under this rule, if both parents are temporary residents, their US-born children wouldn't be US citizens. Image
3/ The next paragraph says that this rule only applies to those born after 19 February 2025, and therefore not retrospectively. However, as this protection only exists in the executive order and not in any statute or the US constitution, it can be revoked at the stroke of a pen. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(