Lesbian Tipping Habits Profile picture
Jan 28 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
@kilderry30123 @McFaul In America, former officials other than presidents return to private life.

Secretary Pompeo has been a former official for an entire presidential term, longer than he served in the Trump 45 Administration.

Active duty government personnel must protect current officials.

1/
@kilderry30123 @McFaul If Congress wants former officials to be protected, Congress should legislate to this effect.

For example, if warranted by threat assessment and means test, the government could pay for private security.

Otherwise, it’s a boondoggle.

2/2
@kilderry30123 @McFaul @UnrollHelper

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lesbian Tipping Habits

Lesbian Tipping Habits Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoLesbiansTip

Jan 24
@stevesi28838948 I have a specific suggestion.

for former officials, a very brief time period, just long enough for a threat assessment and making private arrangements, if needed.

Yes, the government should pay for private security based on threat assessments and means-tested.

1/
@stevesi28838948 for private security, the only issue is money.

If a former government official is under threat, and passes the means test, it’s not wrong for the government to pay.

Active-duty personnel need to focus on current officials.

Otherwise, it becomes a boondoggle.

2/
@stevesi28838948 Secretary Pompeo has been a former government official - and private citizen - for an entire presidential term, longer than he served in the Trump 45 Administration.

At some point, he and others must return to private life.

This helps to limit adversaries wasting our time.

3/3
Read 4 tweets
Jan 7
@RonaldKessler

I just read your book First Family Detail.

Further re pp. 217 - 219, insufficient magnetometers:

On Wednesday, August 28, 2013, I went to the Mall for the 50th anniversary of the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.

To enter the secure area,
basically the Lincoln Memorial and its Reflecting Pool, the magnetometers - 7 or 9, I don’t remember - were set up east of 17th Street, on the west side of the Washington Monument grounds.

I got there very early, over 2 hours before the program began, but it still took forever.
When the program began, I and many others, all of whom got there very early, nevertheless barely entered before everything was over.

And I wondered how this could happen.

Federal property less than a mile or two from the White House.

A long-planned event, not a pop-up.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2024
What bothers me about Shakopee Precinct 10 early in-person absentee (envelope) voting 15 - 17 October, 2024, is that each of those 20 voters - our fellow Americans - had the opportunity to vote the entire ballot, from President to unopposed incumbent District Court Judge.

1/
Yes, their ballots included State Representative (54A), currently being contested, but they didn’t necessarily only vote in that contest.

Once elections officials figured out that the votes of these 20 identifiable citizens had not been counted, they should have invited them

2/
to return to City Hall, preferably on one day, sending an official limousine with police escort, for a do-over.

Then add their re-votes - up to 20 ballots - to the official totals.

Sadly, their votes - their voices - have been ignored.

@MNSecofState @MinnesotaDFL @mngop

3/3
Read 4 tweets
Dec 6, 2024
⁦@TheAtlantic⁩ @ElainaPlott I am reading ⁦@Kash_Patel⁩’s book.

He discusses October 30, 2020, on page 150.

Why did you say he didn’t mention it at all? Did you read his book?

I think he’s a loose cannon but he’s correct about media lies. theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
Here’s your para 72, if I am counting correctly. Image
And here’s page 150 of Government Gangsters. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(