There is a political party and professional apparatus that put male rapists and murderers in women's prisons, propagandized kindergartners that any of them could change sex, forced taxpayers and insurance customers to fund electrolysis and facial feminization surgeries, put any boy or man who claimed to be female into changing rooms with your daughters, forced you to declare the gender identity of your toddler at the doctor's office, deceived parents about the social transition of their children at school, banned psychological exploration of the mental health comorbidities that manifest as trans-ideation in the midst of an online social contagion generating 5000 percent increases in trans identification among youth, fined all-female nude spas run by immigrants for excluding men with penises who claimed to be women for violating the human rights of those men, imposed men on the athletic playing fields with your daughters, told thousands of parents to submit to the chemical castration of their children to avert imminent suicide risk for which no evidence has ever existed, subjected thousands of children to macabre sex changes procedures while lying about the existence of an evidence base where none ever existed while claiming on the basis of no evidence that the procedures were life-saving, investigated parents who refused to put their children on a pipeline to a lifetime of medicalized self-harm by pretending they had changed sex and sought to seize custody of them, and threatened to unperson you, attack your livelihood and leave you ostracized if you resisted it in any way with the aid of the monopolistic tech platforms that control the circulation of speech and money around the globe in a new surveillance and censorship regime that sought to dismantle biological reality in the name of narcissistic fantasies that it intended to entrench as the only truth while corrupting the truth-seeking apparatus of science itself -- and there is a majority of normal people in both parties who oppose this nonsense and want it stopped.
Obviously one can posit the existence of anti-trans extremists who want to put trans people in concentration camps and force them to transition and there may even be individuals who harbor such repressive fantasies. But there is no organized movement anywhere in the world that seeks such outcomes and scarcely any individual with a significant public profile who articulates such a vision. The Trump Administration's EO spells out an agenda with zero overlap with such imaginary anti-trans extremism.
It instead seeks to dismantle institutional investment in and coercive state power over those who wish to opt out of compelled obeisance to falsehoods -- it wishes to undo the institutionalization of the pro-trans extremism that seized control of American institutions under Biden.
The transgender movement must observe the same limits on the scope of its ambitions that every movement in a liberal, pluralistic, democratic society must observe. If such limits rule out most of the movement's demands, it reflects the illiberal, undemocratic, and authoritarian nature of its demands which therefore must be refused.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The BC Human Rights Tribunal issued a decision that established the principle that doubting a man's claim that he is a woman is "existential denialism" and levied a $750K fine against a man who harbored those doubts and stated them aloud.
Now on cue, an adult male convicted criminal and serial harasser who abused the tribunal process to target immigrant women who provide intimate services to women because they wouldn't wax his balls is shooting off accusations of "existential denialism" at everyone who accurately refers to his sex (he is a man).
The adult male convicted criminal and serial harasser is right that everyone he is targeting has indeed made repeated and public statements that men cannot become women and that despite his claims to be a woman that he is man. He is therefore arguably right that each of these people has placed themselves in violation of the tribunal's precedential finding that defines refusal of a man's claim to be a woman as "existential denialism."
Will the tribunal enforce its prohibition on "existential denialism" by levying ruinous fines on Brodie and others who deny that a man can become a woman? (Men cannot become women.)
Will the courts issue warrants for the arrest of any who refuse to pay these fines? Will they incarcerate people who 1.) deny that a man becomes a woman when he says he is a woman and 2.) assert that despite Jessica Yaniv's to be a women, he remains a man? (Jessica Yaniv is a man.)
It was always going to come to this. Now is the time for choosing.
In Rituals of Blood, the sociologist Orlando Patterson dismantled the myth that Black American had created functional alternatives to the nuclear family of village-like structures that compensate for the breakdown of the family.
In fact, Black Americans are the most socially isolated Americans with sparser rather than denser social networks in the Hood than those outside of it.
TLDR: Black Villages aren't real
"Which brings me to the second popular piece of folklore among modern Afro-Americans, what may be called the myth of the “hood,” the belief that viable informal friendship patterns and communities exist, compensating for the breakdown or absence of more formal institutions. Through sheer, baseless repetition, and through nonrepresentative case studies of a few Afro-American housing projects by urban anthropologists, it has become an accepted belief that large networks of support and natural neighborhood communities are out there waiting to be developed and built on.
Would that this were so. But my own analysis of representative samples of national network surveys confirms what other scholars have found: The typical Afro-American has a much smaller network of friends and kinsmen than other Americans do. And, what was most unexpected, the proportion of the members of this attenuated network who are kinsmen is smaller than in other Americans’ networks. There are no “hoods” out there, which is precisely why murderous gangs, like opportunistic social cancers, rush in to fill the vacuum."
People are laughing at the Quebec Human Rights Commission awarding a $500 judgment to a bald non-binary identified man who claimed that he was oppressed because a hair salon only offered men's and women's haircuts.
But another Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in British Columbia has fined a man for refusing to parrot the false dogmas of the transgender movement, effectively making it illegal for anyone to disagree that a man claiming to be a woman becomes a woman by virtue of the claim.
The tribunals are a totalitarian menace and must all be decommissioned.
When I refer to "Hanania-tier hypocrisy", I refer to the most brazen lies ever told in a tone of supercilious scorn despite everyone, including himself, knowing that there is easily available evidence in his own publicly broadcasted words contradicting a posture he is assuming at the moment, quickly followed by assertions that thrashing around from one position to its opposite is a mark of a superior mind
No, the claim emerging from postmodern academia was that the harms associated with fat stigma imposed a psychic burden on patients that was more injurious to health than obesity itself.
Of course I don't think in terms of Team Blue or Team Red -- another example of Hanania's willingness to tell brazen lies that everyone, including himself, knows are false. persuasion.community/p/no-the-bmi-i…
First, the ACLU's lead trans rights litigator admitted before the Supreme Court that there is no evidence to support the claim that chemically castrating children reduces suicide.
Today, the incoming president of the medical lobby that creates standards of care for the gender industry is published stating that cutting off the breasts of teenage girls caught up in the delusion that they are boys isn't suicide prevention either.
And yet California is suing a hospital for complying with federal mandates to stop transing minors.
Gerald Posner on why the $2 million judgment against gender cultists who cut off the breasts of a 16-year old girl to "affirm" the delusion that doing so would turn her male marks the beginning of the end of the worst medical scandal of any of our lifetimes:
"For years, critics of pediatric gender medicine have warned that vulnerable minors were being rushed toward irreversible interventions without science-based psychological exploration, without meaningful long-term outcome data, and under an atmosphere of emotional coercion that routinely invoked suicide risk to justify speed. In this case, jurors heard testimony that a parent opposed the surgery but consented out of fear that refusal might lead to self-harm. They heard evidence that clinicians lacked full knowledge of the patient’s doubts and psychological history. They heard that key records were never obtained and that the professionals involved failed to meaningfully consult with one another.
In other words, they heard facts that successful trial lawyers understand very well."
Meanwhile, state attorney generals are pushing to make it illegal NOT to propagate the cult of medicalized self-harm recruiting among troubled children