You didn’t block me for being racist; I never said a single derogatory word about the Romani or any other race. Personal criticism of you isn’t automatically racist just because you go around pretending to be a racial minority - it wouldn’t be even if you actually were one.
No, you blocked me because I caught you lying about being a “real life Gypsy,” so you yelled racism as a distraction - just like you’re doing now.
All the actual racism, though, was and is coming from you. Attacking people for being white, even if they aren’t, is every bit as racist as attacking people for being black, and making hateful generalizations about white people is just as racist as making hateful generalizations about any other race.
I also found it ironic that you had no problem with calling _me_ white like it was an insult, even after you learned that my grandfather actually did have some Romani heritage. I guess it’s only racism if it’s directed at you.
My grandfather was only 1/4 Romani, of course, but unlike you, he actually looked it. Even I look more Romani than you do, and I look pretty white. You’re so white that you look like you’re descended from a potato, though, and no matter what you may try to claim about your features, the only noticeable difference between you and the next white woman is that gross, scruffy neckbeard and that constantly angry facial expression that makes you look like you haven’t been able to sh!t for a week. You talk a lot about trans joy, but you sure don’t seem to be experiencing it.
You have repeatedly claimed to have been “raised in the Romani culture,” but somehow you don’t seem to know anything about the traditions a Romani woman would have been expected to follow, beyond being “ultrafeminine.”
In fact, your knowledge of Romani culture is obviously extremely shallow, limited to a few basic facts that you repeat over and over again. There’s no depth to it; you know nothing that can’t be learned by a quick scan of a few Wikipedia pages, and everything you do seem to know is about the persecution they endured. What a shock. 🙄
You also claimed to be writing a book about the Romani from an “insider’s perspective,” but you apparently had no idea that doing so would violate cultural taboos that are so strong that they kept Romani survivors of the Holocaust/Porajmos from talking to historians - or anyone else - about their experiences in German hands, and have been a significantly limiting factor for scholars seeking to study Romani culture in general and the Porajmos in particular. (This is a fact that every serious student of WWII and/or the Holocaust is well aware of, but you claimed that the history was “repressed” by outside forces.)
When I called you out on the book claim, you provided this picture as “proof” that you were writing one. The problem with that is that these aren’t titles that would help you with the book you claimed to be writing. Made any progress since May, btw?
Along with a few books by outsiders about “Gypsy” history in Europe, you also have “Gypsy Sorcery and Fortune Telling” (I’m sure that’s a helpful, factual source), an introduction to the Romani language (an odd thing to have, since you’ve claimed to have grown up speaking it), a book about a Belgian boy who ran away from home to “live with the gypsies,” and “Star of Gypsies,” which is a science fiction novel about the Romani in outer space, and their homeworld. That’s not exactly the sort of material that’s going to help you write a book about US Romani culture from an insider’s perspective; it’s more like the stack of books you’d end up with if you checked out everything that came up when you searched your local library’s catalog for the word “gypsy.”
I’m not even sure why you’d need any research material at all, actually, given that you’re supposedly writing a book about your own experiences and the culture in the United States that you say you grew up in, not a general history of the Romani in Europe.
On the other hand, this kind of reading list would give you the information you’ve been using to pass yourself off as Romani to people who don’t know any better.
(You also seem to think, despite all evidence to the contrary, that you’re extremely attractive. Maybe autoandrophilia really does exist after all.)
By this point in the discussion, you’d stooped to claims that your family was “all up on” a book (and you’re a lawyer?), racist remarks about white people, and repeatedly rage-tweeting “cope and seethe.” You also provided a picture of a man whom you claimed was your grandfather that was obviously from a book; you didn’t have any actual pictures of him for some strange reason. 🤔
Not only that; in between your racist comments about white people, you took the time to accuse me of racism, because apparently contradicting your bullshit claims is somehow derogatory towards Romani people as a whole.
When I wouldn’t let you get away with that, you blocked me….and then immediately changed your bio from “half Romani Gypsy” to read “rebellious Romani soul.”
Hmm, I wonder why. 🤨 It’s not exactly the action of someone whose family used the term amongst themselves, which is what you had initially claimed.
You’re a liar, Erica, and you’re very obviously obsessed with being seen as a victim. Every single thing you say about yourself is said with that in mind. It’s why you pretend to be Romani — so that you can go around telling people how much of a victim it makes you. I can’t find a single comment from you about that part of your “heritage” that doesn’t include some reference to how oppressed they are.
You don’t talk about the culture in any real way, but you sure do like to lecture people about how much the Romani - and by extension, you - have suffered. You think that experiencing prejudice or hardship makes you special, and better than other people — that much is blindingly obvious. It doesn’t; it just makes you unlucky.
It’s clearly vital to your sense of self worth to be seen as the nobly suffering victim of a cruel and prejudiced society; so vital that when gay people started to gain real acceptance, you had to transition so that you could retain that special status as the most Victimy Victim Ever to be Victimized. I guess being a lesbian just didn’t make you feel persecuted enough any more. Being “trans” gets you the best of both worlds, though - that aura of victimhood, the praise and adulation of the left, and criticism that you can point to and call oppression.
What you fail to realize is that worth and value don’t come from being treated badly, or from experiencing suffering. Worth, value, and maturity all come from the struggle of overcoming those things, and from how you react to them, not from wallowing in your oppression like a hog in a mud hole, or shoving the tragic history of the culture you’ve appropriated into everyone’s face so they can treat you with what you feel is the appropriate amount of reverence. Misfortune isn’t what builds character; suffering doesn’t ennoble you; and the mistreatment of your so-called ancestors wouldn’t make you better than other people, or deserving of special privileges and attention, even if you were telling the truth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Hey, @NorthwesternU - why is one of your professors threatening to harm lesbians who refuse to sleep with transwomen? Lesbians have every right to choose our sexual partners based on what we find attractive, and we will no longer be bullied by men who 1/
think themselves entitled to tell us who we must date and sleep with.
This homophobic, regressive attitude is no different than corrective rape: men telling gay women that we must learn to like dick — or at least shut up and take it. 2/
If I were a young lesbian at your university, I would feel incredibly uncomfortable knowing that one of the professors thinks that I have no right to choose a partner based on my own personal criteria, but should instead spread my legs for any man willing to put on a dress. 3/
I’ve now read dozens of posts and comments about the stabbing of the trans-identifying boy from people on both sides, and I’ve noticed something. The “transphobes” are all very clear that the entire incident was unacceptable, and that the perpetrators deserve to be punished. 1/
The trans community, on the other hand, is doing everything in its power to deflect attention away from the rape that triggered the stabbing by viciously attacking anyone who so much as mentions that it happened. They seem to expect the world to simply pretend that it didn’t 2/
happen — and it seems they’re getting their way where the court system and the press are concerned. No charges are expected to be filed against the transgender rapist, there were no mitigating factors considered during sentencing, and there was no mention of the fact that the 3/
🧵 California never misses a trick when it comes to abusing women. The state’s Department of Corrections has implemented a policy requiring that all strip searches in women’s prisons be videotaped, not to protect the inmates, but to protect female guards. It seems that (1/)
trans-identifying male inmates - whom CDOC requires its female guards to strip search - have been sexually harassing said guards during searches - becoming visibly aroused, etc.
But it doesn’t stop there.
As if it weren’t enough to lock incarcerated women up with violent (2/)
male sex offenders, to force them to share a cell and a shower with these same men, or even to film them being strip searched, male guards have been accused of watching these filmed searches for their own personal enjoyment.
The solution is simple: the male inmates must go (3/)
🧵 I don’t usually do this, but WARNING: the following post is about the sexual assault of a child. It’s one of the worst stories I’ve ever heard of, and I’ve heard a lot. I can’t put the text behind a blurred screen, so the actual post is in the second part of this thread. (1/) is
In 2006, a 12 year old girl in the UK was kidnapped and raped by 2 Muslim men before being thrown out of their moving car.
She begged a man for help. He agreed, and invited her in to clean up, only to sexually assault her himself. She escaped as he was phoning his friends to come join in.
As she made her way along the street after her escape, a passing taxi driver and his passenger stopped to ask if she needed help, and offered her a ride to the police station. Instead, they took her to a house, forced her inside, then locked her in a room where, for the next 24 hours, she was raped over and over again by 5 Muslim men.
The orchestrator of this last atrocity, one Shakil Choudhury, got a grand total of 3 years in prison.
In the space of just a few hours, this girl encountered two groups of Muslim men, all of whom raped her, and another man who assaulted her and was only prevented from sharing her with his friends by her escape. That’s 3 groups of gang rapists in one British town, all the way back in 2006; god only knows how many others are out there now — and the cops and the courts couldn’t care less if they tried.
This isn’t simply a single light sentence. British courts - which will jail British citizens for years over reposting offensive memes - have repeatedly shown a criminal reluctance to hold Muslims accountable for their brutality towards women.
Adil Rashid, a Muslim man who raped a 13 year old girl he met online and lured to a hotel, was excused jail time because he claimed he hadn’t known it was illegal. Rashid stated that his madrassah had taught him that ‘women are no more worthy than a lollipop that has been dropped on the ground.’
Handing down a _nine-month suspended sentence_, Judge Michael Stokes called Rashid “naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters,” and stated that because Rashid was “passive” and “lacking assertiveness,” a jail sentence might do him more harm than good.
Neither Judge Stokes nor anyone else in the courtroom seemed to care about the harm done to Rashid’s victim, or about her naïveté and sexual immaturity.
Stokes added that while he believed Rashid’s statement that the child he raped had been willing to have sex with him, “the law is there to protect young girls, even though they are perfectly happy to engage in sexual activity.”
Rather than emphasizing to Rashid that 13 year olds are children, and are not capable of giving consent, Judge Stokes painted a picture for courtroom spectators of young, willing, foolish girls — a picture that many UK-based Muslims seem only too eager to see…and to exploit.
Judge Stokes also failed to address Rashid’s beliefs about women, merely commenting that “comparing women to lollipops is a very curious way of teaching young men about sex.”
The laws of the United Kingdom have been partially superseded by Sharia law. If a Muslim can get away with raping a child simply because of his religious upbringing, while British citizens are spending years in prison for “Islamophobic” memes, then Albion has fallen. All that’s left now are the formalities.
🧵 In 1977, the Supreme Court ruled that execution was a “grossly disproportionate” punishment for rape. Justice Byron White, a Democrat, wrote in the plurality opinion that:
"…for the rape victim, life may not be nearly so happy as it was, but it is not over and normally is not beyond repair."
1/
No mention was made of the effectiveness of execution as a deterrent for rapists, but crime statistics clearly indicate that it was indeed effective.
In 1976, there were 57,080 rapes reported in the US, a number consistent with the stats from past years. 2/
In 1977, there were 63,500 rapes reported in the US. This was the largest yearly increase in the number of rapes in decades, and it didn’t stop there. In 1978, there were 67,610. In 1979, there were 76,390.
In other words, during the first 3 years after rape no longer meant 3/
One of the main reasons for the success of genderism is the sense of self-righteousness it imparts to those who promote it.
It’s the ultimate test of tolerance for today’s liberals, a competition to see who can allow the most preposterous nonsense. People try to outo each 1/
other in their acceptance of the perverted and insane. They take their kids to drag shows - they let their kids be _in_ drag shows - they let their kids tuck money into a drag queen’s costume - all to proclaim to the world, “look! look how tolerant I am; look how accepting 2/
and open-minded I can be.”
It’s the biggest virtue signal there is, which is why it’s so successful - and so dangerous. Very few people will deliberately do things that they think are evil, but if you can convince them that they’re on the right side of history, you can get 2/