John Ʌ Konrad V Profile picture
Jan 30 34 tweets 11 min read Read on X
I’m friends with a military helicopter pilot who set up the rotary component of Operation Noble Eagle, (the layered air defense system to secure DC after 9/11)

I write books about transportation incidents (mostly ships)

Here’s what he told me with a breakdown for laymen 🧵 Image
Here’s the PART 1 of his full comment to me.

(I’ll break each component in subsequent posts.)

“It's a 100' AGL hard ceiling for rotorcraft and DCA air traffic control is locked on. Extremely high levels of situational awareness in that chunk of airspace. Many swiss cheese holes have to line up for this to happen. As a former NTSB aircraft accident investigator, I am fighting an immediate bias towards likely human error. A buddy on scene reached out earlier and sounds really rough. Tragic but immediate proximity of SAR assets is about as helpful as one could hope for.
It's a 100' AGL hard ceiling for rotorcraft

AGL = Above Ground Level

Rotorcraft is a helicopter

Think of it like this: In Washington, D.C., helicopters have a strict 100-foot height limit—like an invisible ceiling they can’t break. Image
Restricted airspace near airports is shaped like an upside-down wedding cake—wide at the top, narrow at the bottom.

This design lets helicopters fly underneath descending airplanes, staying out of their flight path while still operating near the airport. Image
“DCA air traffic control is locked on”

DCA is Reagan International Airport.

It’s just 3 miles south of the White House so Air traffic control must be extremely vigilant at all times.

ALL TIMES - they are trained to react in seconds Image
“Extremely high levels of situational awareness in that chunk of airspace.”

He reiterates that EVERYONE in the airspace is hyper alert and focused.

✅Airline pilots
✅ Military pilots
✅ Air Traffic Control (ATC)
“Many swiss cheese holes have to line up for this to happen.”

The Swiss Cheese Model explains how accidents happen—not from one big mistake, but from multiple failures stacking up.

Investigators used to call it the “accident chain”—a series of weak links like fatigue, miscommunication, and malfunctions. Break just one, and disaster is avoided.Image
They moved from the error chain to the Swiss Cheese Model because accidents aren’t just a linear sequence of mistakes—they’re a system-wide failure.

The error chain suggested that breaking one link could stop an accident. The Swiss Cheese Model showed that multiple defenses can fail at once, and when enough “holes” align, disaster strikes. It’s a more realistic way to understand complex failures.
Think of a block of Swiss cheese—it has holes all over, but they don’t usually line up perfectly.

Now, imagine each hole is a small mistake, failure, or oversight in a system. For something really bad to happen (like an accident or security breach), all those holes have to line up just right, letting the problem pass through.

It’s a way of saying that disasters don’t usually happen because of one mistake—they happen when multiple failures stack up perfectly.Image
Now modern research suggests that even the Swiss Cheese Model is too simplistic of a way to explain accidents

This is problematic because it puts too much emphasis at the scene and not enough of the FAA, airlines, etc

But this is x so let’s move on a.co/d/1hAOkXS
“As a former NTSB aircraft accident investigator, I am fighting an immediate bias towards likely human error.”

It is VERY easy to blame the pilots and ATC - of these people blame themselves.

It’s OBVIOUS they made a deadly mistake and MSM loves simple headlines.
But we learn nothing by blaming the pilots or air traffic controllers. Worse still it takes pressure off the airline executives, manufacturers and bureaucrats who contributed to the incident.

This is why NTSB being independent is SO important
In Until the Sea Shall Free Them, @rrfrump1 exposes how the US Coast Guard, @DOTMARAD, the shipowner, and unions worked together to pin the blame on the captain after a major ship sinking—because each had their own criminal negligence to hide.

amzn.to/3PVZfY9
Today the pendulum has swung too far the other way.

We are so sensitive to not blaming human error that - 10 months later - we still don’t know the name of the ship pilot in charge in Baltimore Image
And we still don’t know who the US Secret Service Agent was in charge at Butler, PA Image
It’s very difficult in today’s “kinder gentler world” to say BOTH Pilots AND the Air Traffic Controller were at fault.

But that’s just a fact. They were.

But we MUST understand the system to know WHY they made the mistake
“A buddy on scene reached out earlier and sounds really rough.”

This is military and pilot speak for everyone is in shock and answers aren’t forthcoming.

They are focused on the wreckage and preventing immediate mistakes
“Tragic but immediate proximity of SAR assets is about as helpful as one could hope for”

SAR = Search & Rescue

This is why I’ve been harping continuously on the need for fireboats, salvage tugs & more USCG helicopters

Rescue teams lined up along the shore can only do so much Image
PART 2 - here’s the second part of what he told me:

“NTSB is great but we can’t assume pilot error or accident. There needs to be cyber forensics.

Cyber must be presumed until ruled out by very robust cyber forensics++, rather than the legacy approach of the burden of evidence being to rule cyber in (which is never done due to lack of expertise or general fecklessness) - and I believe this should apply to all mishaps across all modes.

The Biden Administration deactivated the cyber investigation strategy Trump 1.0 developed, but I hear they are working to reinstate it. Should apply to all modes of transportation, not just air”
“NTSB is great but we can’t assume pilot error or accident. There needs to be cyber forensics.”

He says he trusts the NTSB, DoD, and FAA to investigate—but cyber is a weak point and few realize cyber evidence is perishable. You can take your time recovering a Black Box, but digital data can be erased or overwritten in seconds.Image
Plus Cyber-terrorists move fast. If you wait, the proof disappears.
“Cyber must be presumed until ruled out by very robust cyber forensics++, rather than the legacy approach of the burden of evidence being to rule cyber in (which is never done due to lack of expertise or general fecklessness)”

He’s saying that investigators don’t dive deep into cyber unless there is cyber evidence, but cyber evidence is difficult to find and perishable.

It’s a basic government Catch 22
“I believe this should apply to all mishaps, across all modes.”

Every agency has cyber forensic tools, but they’re siloed. @US_CYBERCOM is surely investigating—but will they share classified intel with the NTSB & FAA?

And what if the trail leads back to them? As @rrfrump1 showed, agencies don’t rush to expose their own failures.Image
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 “across all modes”

Here’s another problem. Cyber terrorists don’t care if they crash a plane or cause a train explosion.

After the Baltimore Bridge incident Biden greatly expanded the cyber authority of the US Coast Guard.

gcaptain.com/executive-orde…
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 But cyber terrorists don’t really care if they crash a plane or blow up a train.

Like the little Dutch boy, if you secure just one mode (ships) it makes the other modes relatively easier to attack. Image
TO BE CLEAR: I have zero evidence this was a cyberattack—this is just hypothetical.

The problem? The investigation WILL find issues (they always do). And IF this was cyber, billions could be wasted “fixing” the wrong parts of the system while the real vulnerability remains.

Something always gets blamed and blaming the wrong things is counterproductive
“The Biden Administration deactivated the cyber investigation strategy Trump 1.0 developed, but I hear they are working to reinstate it.”

@JoshuaSteinman was Deputy Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Cyber during Trump 1.0

@MikeBenzCyber was involved too

I don’t have insight into specifics on what Josh’s team created but I HIGHLY encourage you to subscribe to both accounts. The vulnerabilities they have shared publicly are truly terrifying… I can’t even imagine the classified information in their brains.
Finally: Investigations aren’t enough.

The NTSB is great with aviation (less so with ships), but there’s a long history of agencies hiding embarrassing details from them. That’s why PUBLIC HEARINGS matter.

@SecretaryPete, @AliMayorkas & fired USCG Commandant Linda Fagan indefinitely postponed the Baltimore Bridge hearings.

We must ask @KristiNoem & @SeanDuffyWI to schedule them NOW—before the evidence goes cold. 👇👇
Thanks for reading and sharing!

If you’re fascinated by transportation disasters, subscribe to my newsletter @gCaptain for deep dives into maritime crises (check out @FreightAlley for pure aviation).

And if you want the full story of the worst man-made environmental disaster ever, grab a copy of my book 👇
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 @JoshuaSteinman @MikeBenzCyber @SecretaryPete @AliMayorkas @gCaptain @FreightAlley Fire on the Horizon: The Untold Story of the Gulf Oil Disaster

amzn.to/42BQwSu
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 @JoshuaSteinman @MikeBenzCyber @SecretaryPete @AliMayorkas @gCaptain @FreightAlley UPDATE: The 100FT ceiling is not “hard”

Checking to see if my source got the altitude wrong or if the hard ceiling restriction was eased.
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 @JoshuaSteinman @MikeBenzCyber @SecretaryPete @AliMayorkas @gCaptain @FreightAlley Here’s a detailed breakdown of the airspace from a USCG helicopter pilot on Reddit. 👇
Regarding the flight ceiling confusion:

A highly experienced USCG helo pilot (thousands of hours out of DCA) clarified:
•The chart says 200’, but military guidance kept them below 125’—often flying closer to 75’, even on goggles.
•USCG is the only rotorcraft based at DCA, so they were more acutely aware of the risks than other military pilots and likely had tighter guidelines than Army helicopters
•The red on the chart (photo below) marked their “Powerplant Course”—was the USCG’s strict heading and ceiling route designed to stay below glidepath.
•They were carefully sequenced to avoid disrupting commercial traffic.Image
@US_CYBERCOM @rrfrump1 @JoshuaSteinman @MikeBenzCyber @SecretaryPete @AliMayorkas @gCaptain @FreightAlley UPDATE 2: Tump has weighed in.

tl;dr He says @SecretaryPete is primarily at blame:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Ʌ Konrad V

John Ʌ Konrad V Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johnkonrad

Jan 16
It’s a travesty that Navy Admirals ditched the wool pea coat.

Not just a blow to tradition—it’s a risky move if we expand operations in Greenland. But I think I know why.

A 🧵on why the Navy is no longer cool (or warm without its pea coats)
When I joined the Navy in 1995, camo was banned off base and aboard ships.

That changed when the Navy shifted to supporting the Army in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Now? Sailors can even wear camo aboard the historic USS Constitution.

Times change—but should traditions? Image
This accelerated the decline of navy specific uniforms and set the stage for removing Pea Coats from seabags Image
Read 53 tweets
Nov 17, 2024
What if America is already far wealthier than you can imagine?

What if taxes aren’t the only drag on revenue?

What if bureaucracy and monetary leaks are hidden taxes?

What if bureaucracy, foreign aid, financial accounting leaks and taxes are more about control than balancing budgets?

What if $36 of debt isn’t as insurmountable as it seems?

What if, after we eliminate them 🇺🇸 becomes vastly wealthier overnight?

What if American productivity was fully unleashed?

Not saying I believe all this but it’s 💯 important to ask ‘what if’
Read 9 tweets
Oct 30, 2024
Long 🧵warning:

For my entire life, I’ve picked candidates based on rational thinking, but this time I’m going with emotion—“my gut.” One emotion specifically is driving my vote: anger

Biden’s “trash” comment has a deeper meaning, it wasn’t a simple mistake and let me explain why.

There has never been a more emotionally charged election in my lifetime. Sometimes the hope, indignation, incredulity, excitement, shame, frustration, and concern feel like they’re tearing me apart.

It’s tearing some of you apart too, and that’s okay. Emotional response is okay… if it’s authentic.

It’s ok to feel all types of emotion, except one.

We live in a culture that tries to remove emotion from the human experience. This isn’t healthy. You should feel empowered to feel every emotion against the opposition EXCEPT anger.

Anger is dangerous and unauthentic.

John A. Konrad III, my grandpa, had a great Irish-German anger problem. Stories of his rages were legendary, and my dad and uncle suffered the wrath. Not entirely his fault—I blame the PTSD from many bombing runs over Nazi Germany.

John A. Konrad IV, my dad, also had bouts of anger. Less severe, but more imposing because he was 6’2” and 275 lbs of pure muscle. BIG Jack. A Vietnam vet and Bronx firefighter, he could channel the early stages of anger into a stare that would quiet a room and make grown men shake. Unfortunately, I occasionally got to see him past the “in control” phase. It wasn’t pretty.

When you experience rage as a kid, you become very attuned to emerging anger. When you’re the child of a hardened vet who can turn on and off that anger at will, you become very attuned to authentic anger, both controlled and uncontrolled.

I am an expert in very few things, but anger is one of them.

I say this because I’ve been retweeting a lot of posts by angry people lately, and almost all are Democrats. The comments I get are “that’s not anger, that’s passion,” or “she has good reasons for being angry,” or “you’re wrong, John.”

I know anger, and I’m seeing it in abundance today—and the vast majority is on the left.

And my experience comes not just from living with anger but from going out of my way to read and learn about anger.

Why? Because I did not want to pass it on to my son and daughter.

Anger is toxic like no other emotion.

What have I learned from a lifetime studying anger? Lots, but the breakthrough came on a trip to California when I met Marshall Rosenberg, the father of Nonviolent Communication. He taught me an important lesson: all anger derives from misplaced judgment.

Let me repeat: all anger derives from misplaced judgment.

We are angry because we think we know what the other side is thinking. We think we know why they are voting for Kamala or Trump. We think they see the same rational information and pick the idiotic, selfish, or, worse, malevolent choice.

Why I mentioned Grandpa was because I never once witnessed anger in his voice. He was the kindest, most gentle man in my life. I certainly believed the stories of his rages, but I never experienced them.

Why?

Today, I broke down in tears, and the reason dawned on me. Why are so many poor fathers wonderful grandparents?

What happened is my son went to college a few months back, and my wife has been bugging me to disassemble his bed so we can turn his room into an office.

Simple task, but as I was halfway through, something dawned on me. He had slept in this bed his entire life. 18 wonderful years. And now it was going away.

I cried like a baby. Just me. Nobody around to witness it.

What got me was how unexpected it was. One minute I’m listening to music with tools, the next I’m paralyzed with emotion.

The smaller but important lesson here is that time moves quickly, and we should not allow anger to rule any of it. Grandpas have a perspective on time—they understand this. 1/4
But what grandpas (most at least—some men never learn this) know is how impossible it is to understand yourself. I’ve been living in this body for 47 years, and I did not expect to cry today. Yet here we are.

Grandpas understand what dads do not: that their lack of self-understanding is often the cause of kids’ misbehavior.

Kids do not understand their personal behavior or inner rationality. They are kids, learning. This is often what sends parents into rage.

“Why did you do that absolutely idiotic thing, Jimmy?”

Jimmy tells you the reason, and you don’t believe him. You think he’s lying. The thing is, HE IS LYING, but not to you—to himself.

Jimmy doesn’t know why he did it, just like I didn’t realize I was going to cry today. 2/4
All anger derives from misplaced judgment.

There are two ways to eliminate anger:

1.Work to understand the perspectives of the other side.

Now, this doesn’t mean you have to agree with them. Many things the left (and some on the right) say fill me with frustration, fear, and other strong emotions.

But these emotions are natural. They are non-judgmental. They are healthy, whereas anger is not.

2.Forgive. Understand the lesson I learned today, the lesson Grandpa Jack learned without realizing it: that people are complicated, make mistakes, and have different perspectives.

99.9% of people on the right are not “voting for a Nazi,” and 99.9% of people on the left are not “voting for a communist.” They don’t see it like that.

Assuming they “know Trump is a felon” is false. We know the legal definition, but we have doubts about the DA’s methods.

But that’s why so many on the left are angry. They think they know exactly why people are voting for Trump. The fact is, they don’t know.

And why is that anger less prominent on the right? Because the right understands the influence of the education system and media. They know why people vote for Kamala. They are frustrated, fearful, and a host of other emotions, but they aren’t angry because they know there are many reasons why you won’t vote for Trump.

That’s why so many Republicans roll their eyes while Democrats get triggered.

The world is complicated, and the years Grandpa lived calmed down his anger because he realized he didn’t even know his own motivations, let alone someone else’s.

All anger derives from misplaced judgment.

And that’s why I can’t get over Biden’s rage and comments about Trump supporters being trash. It’s easy to say the ‘trash’ comment was a mistake, but it wasn’t. It wasn’t because it came from a place of anger, which is judgmental. 3/4
Read 5 tweets
Oct 28, 2024
My wife is a teacher. Here’s excerpts from the special kids election edition of the @NYTimes being taught in some public schools this week.

Editors note: grown-ups should not read this Image
Apparently Trump thinks everyone should be able to buy fully automatic grenade launchers Image
Trump grew up in Queens but no mention that Kamala grew up in Canada

Specifics on how Trump’s dad made money but none on what type of economics Harris’ Dad taught Image
Read 20 tweets
Oct 4, 2024
keep getting DM’s the same two questions:

1) what ended the Port Strike?

2) Was it @GovRonDeSantis calling the NG?

Here’s the timeline from my sources….

Up until 14:09 on Tuesday all my reliable sources were telling me the ILA was digging in for a long fight

@typesfast - who has the best ocean data in the world - was the first to make bold counter call “with 80% probably it will be over by Tuesday”

His company @flexport has some of the best experts in the business and can see in realtime if ships are diverting or not. That combined with smart staff who understand history, political and economic issues is likely what drove the prediction

Ryan also didn’t hesitate to collect information directly from experts.

The person with the best trucking data (trucks need to start diverting too) is @FreightAlley and he echoed Ryan’s optimism yesterday.

Yesterday afternoon @mercoglianos started warning us at @gCaptain to be ready

Biden then made a statement of support of the union and @SecretaryPete applied pressure on USMX at 8PM. DC was finally waking up

Yesterday afternoon I received information from a source that Daggett was getting death threats and public sentiment was against him. Some of his advisers were suggesting he sit down for a deal

Later I got confirmation from another source along the same lines.

There were two problems with the information that prevented me from making a prediction:

1) other sources were adamant the ILA would not budge on automation

2) we got a statement from ILA confirming that Daggett was thrown by the backlash but it said he was a combat veteran and a fighter who wouldn’t back down

This morning more sources confirmed that DC was waking up and ILA was breaking due to the backlash

@mercoglianos got solid information a deal would be made

I published the article on @gCaptain “TikTok Fury and Death Threats: Will ILA Union Boss Daggett Fold or Double Down?”

I also talked to a source in the Trump camp who assured me DJT had deep knowledge of the issues from his time as a NYC real estate developer and was working the problem. No details how but told to watch for something thst would “move the needle”

Talked to @mercoglianos again and he was confident a deal was coming soon

Around lunch I finally got a hold of a Democrat source who said “it close but there’s a sticking point” I assumed it was automation but they would confirm

At 12:52 @GovRonDeSantis called the national guard to take over the ports in FL

Had a long conversation with Sal @mercoglianos @MikeSchuler around lunch and confidence it would end was high but nobody was sure exactly when

I disappeared into meetings for the rest of the afternoon.

I was hesitant to make a call because numerous sources said the ILA was still dug in over automation.

17:18 Sal calls it outscooping everyone

@MikeSchuler gets it up on @gCaptain just after it becomes official /1
So, what exactly happened?

It’s hard to say for sure, but I’m confident the ILA expected public support—and the backlash flipped the script.

The rest is just my informed speculation:

Biden did a good job threading the needle with by supporting the union but applying gentle pressure behind the scene.

@SecretaryPete helped by finally stepping in.

A source close to Trump told me his NYC real estate meant he understand the dynamics well. While it’s unclear if he directed DeSantis, he likely gave at least tacit approval for calling in the National Guard.

Sources told me the deal was nearly done, but no one was sure if it would take hours or days. DeSantis’ move likely sealed the deal, removing any lingering doubt.

Both Trump and Kamala did the country a favor by not turning this into a political fight. Trump had more to gain but also more risk—if the strike dragged on, he could’ve picked up populist support, but Kamala might’ve taken full credit if a deal was struck right before the election.

Kamala stayed quiet, but with Marty Walsh as a close adviser, a union pro, she likely knew more than she let on.

I think all parties made fairly smart moves and I am very glad nobody leveraged this hard for political gain!

That’s a win for the entire nation!!

All this plus a very civil and smart VP debate gives me renewed hope for our future.

/2
All my best sources on the inside as well as my extremely smart friends - @typesfast @FreightAlley @mercoglianos @MikeSchuler - gave clear warnings

Do I regret not breaking the news early?

Not at all!

What made me hesitate most was the automation issue and that has NOT been settled.

All we got was an agreement on pay and broad strokes for a temporary return to work until that great prize fight is announced

I think this was smart for the ILA. It:

1) Lets public outrage settle

2) lets them regroup and rethink strategy

3) shows they are reasonable

4) likely gives them some political credits with both parties

5) lets them lock in much higher paying

USMX wins because there was the ability for ILA and Biden to hammer home the fact that ship owners sre far wealthier than Daggett

/3
Read 8 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
Craig has an excellent post on the ILA, but what’s missing is a deep dive into the organization they’re negotiating with: USMX

If the ILA is “bad”, USMX is possibly worse

Who are they and why?

USMX (United States Maritime Alliance) represents shipping companies, port operators, and other maritime players along the U.S. East and Gulf coasts. Their role? To negotiate labor contracts and operational policies with dockworker unions like the ILA, ensuring smooth port operations.

But here’s where it gets tricky: despite its American identity, USMX is heavily influenced by foreign interests, including massive overseas corporations like the China-controlled COSCO Shipping.

Although USMX is supposed to represent U.S. interests, foreign-controlled companies within the alliance have significant sway over key decisions. Why? These large companies, with deeper pockets and bigger fleets, control more resources, giving them outsized influence in decision-making. Here’s how they wield their power:

1.Board Representation: Foreign shipping giants often hold significant seats on USMX’s board, shaping agendas and steering decisions.
2.Economic Clout: The financial contributions of the largest foreign ship owners give them more say in how resources are allocated within the alliance, often to suit their own interests.
3.Committees and Expertise: Employees from these companies often lead technical committees, giving them control over critical policy recommendations.
4.Strategic Coalitions: These companies form alliances with other members to drive consensus on issues that benefit them, amplifying their collective influence.
5.Information Access: With access to greater data and resources, they can craft well-founded proposals that steer USMX’s strategy.

So, while USMX negotiates with American dockworkers, foreign ship owners shape these labor negotiation policies.

When USMX prioritizes keeping trade flowing by catering to foreign interests, the U.S. risks losing control over its own critical shipping infrastructure, raising concerns for national security and long-term economic stability. /1
That maybe ok when we are talking about a NATO ally like the Danish company @Maersk or the French @cmacgm

But China’s CCP controlled @COSCOSHIPPING has a board seat too?

How Could China Exert Influence on USMX Decisions?

1.Economic Leverage: China, as a major global trading partner, wields substantial influence by controlling the flow of goods. By offering increased cargo traffic or threatening to divert shipping routes to other countries, they can pressure USMX into making decisions that favor their interests. A promise of more business can entice USMX to align with China’s trade preferences, while the threat of reduced cargo could financially strain U.S. ports.
2.Influence Operations: Behind-the-scenes lobbying is another tactic. China can engage intermediaries or businesspeople with connections to both Chinese interests and USMX, subtly encouraging policies that align with Chinese objectives. These indirect methods create the appearance of a fair negotiation, while steering decisions toward outcomes beneficial to China’s shipping dominance.
Chain Dependence: Many U.S. industries rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing. China could highlight this dependency, reminding USMX that disruptions in their trade relationship could severely impact the supply chain. This indirect pressure encourages USMX to adopt policies that prioritize maintaining smooth trade with China, even if it compromises broader U.S. interests.
4.Leveraging International Regulations: China also works through international bodies like the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to shape global shipping standards. By pushing for regulations that align with its own shipping practices, China can exert influence on USMX to adopt similar policies. These standards may be presented as neutral but are often designed to favor Chinese shipping interests, creating further leverage in global trade negotiations.

While these tactics are subtle, they exemplify the complex web of economic and political influence in international trade, demonstrating how a foreign power like China can quietly shape U.S. maritime policies through economic and regulatory pressure.

/33.Supply
How China Influence could hypothetically Impact USMX’s Broader Role in U.S. National Security:

1. Strategic Supply Chain Control: By shaping USMX decisions, China can indirectly influence the U.S.’s broader supply chain infrastructure. This extends beyond port operations to critical sectors like technology and defense, where the U.S. is reliant on components manufactured in or routed through China. If USMX aligns too closely with foreign interests, this could create vulnerabilities in supply chains crucial for national security.

2. Erosion of U.S. Port Independence: Foreign influence, especially from China, can gradually undermine U.S. port autonomy. If foreign-owned companies and their allies within USMX push for policies that favor their interests, U.S. ports might become increasingly reliant on foreign directives for trade decisions. This compromises U.S. control over its own shipping networks, potentially jeopardizing both economic and strategic independence.

3. Global Geopolitical Leverage: U.S. ports are integral to the country’s global trade power. However, by subtly influencing USMX, China can limit the U.S.’s ability to exert its geopolitical influence via trade. This could extend to controlling key shipping routes or encouraging trade agreements that sideline U.S. interests in favor of Chinese dominance in the Pacific and beyond. This creates long-term strategic risks for the U.S. in maintaining its global maritime leadership.

4. Leverage over terminals and dockworkers could become a real-time throttle on the economy

By allowing foreign entities like China to indirectly shape policy within USMX, the U.S. risks losing not just economic control over its ports, but also strategic positioning in the ever-competitive global maritime landscape. /4
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(