Scott Ritter Profile picture
Jan 30, 2025 9 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Trump and May 9

A little more than a week into his presidency, Donald Trump’s optimistic plan to bring an end to the war in Ukraine is floundering, with the fantasy-driven “peace plan” crafted under the guidance of retired LtGen Keith Kellogg running head on into the fact-driven reality of a Russian victory defined by objectives unfettered and unfazed by American posturing and threats.Image
As the Trump administration prepares for the all-important first phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin, it is hampered by the fact that there will be no second chance—either Trump has a viable strategy for bringing the conflict in Ukraine to an end that addresses Russian reality and sensibilities, or Russia will finish the war on its own terms.Image
Rather than trying to solve the complexities associated with conflict termination in Ukraine, Donald Trump might be better off focusing on the fundamentals of diplomacy, working to build a foundation of trust and goodwill with Russia that could pay dividends later on during whatever peace negotiation process is eventually agreed to.Image
On May 9 Russia will celebrate Victory Day, perhaps the most solemn and significant holiday on the Russian calendar. This year Russia will celebrate the 80th anniversary of the allied defeat of Nazi Germany.
Russia has always emphasized that this victory was a team effort. In past years, the United States and the other allied nations (the UK and France) would send official delegations to the celebration, and military contingents from the allied nations would march in solidarity with the Russian Army to celebrate this great victory.Image
But in recent years the United States and its European partners have been overcome by Russophobia, reimagining the history of that time to minimize the important role played by the Red Army in defeating Hitler’s Germany.
May 9 has been likewise reimagined as little more than a propaganda exercise designed to glorify Russian military power.Image
I had the honor and privilege of attending the May 9 Victory Day celebrations in 2023. I bear personal witness to the seriousness Russians attach to this day. Yes, the Russians are, rightfully, proud of their military. Yes, the Russians support their military in the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
But May 9 is about the 27 million Soviet citizens who perished in the Great Patriotic War, and the millions of Red Army soldiers who gave their lives to free the Soviet Union and the world from the yoke of Nazi terror.Image
Donald Trump has an opportunity to put the US and Russia on the path of repairing a relationship that must be repaired if our two nations are going to find a way to peacefully coexist.
Donal Trump’s first conversation with Vladimir Putin should be to recognize the alliance that once existed to defeat Nazi Germany, and Russia’s important (indeed, leading) role in enabling this success.Image
And Donald Trump should tell Vladimir Putin that he would like to send a high-level delegation to attend this year’s May 9 Victory Day celebration—headed by the Vice President and Secretary of Defense.
And unlike the Biden administration, which placed obstacles in the way of US WW2 veterans who wanted to attend the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow, Donald Trump should offer to have American soldiers march in the May 9 parade.Image
If Donald Trump we’re to do this, he would win the respect and admiration of the Russian people, and demonstrate to the Russian government—indeed, the Russian President—that the US was serious about building a relationship with Russia based on mutual respect.
This, more than trying to bring about a peace in Ukraine by bluster and bullying, is how Donald Trump could best serve the legitimate national security interests of the United States.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Ritter

Scott Ritter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RealScottRitter

Jan 24, 2025
President Donald Trump recently asserted that Russia had stolen plans for an American hypersonic missile Trump called the “super-duper” during the administration of President Barack Obama, and that these stolen plans served as the basis of Russia’s current arsenal of advanced hypersonic weapons. Trump’s allegation repeats a claim he first made on the campaign trail in October 2023. It is likely that Trump is referring to information derived from a counterintelligence briefing he received during his first term in office.Image
The notion that Russian hypersonic weapons are derived from American research and development is facially absurd.
In fact, it appears that the opposite is the case—that the United States has acquired research from Russian hypersonic weapons programs and incorporated it into American weapons systems.Image
Russia’s most advanced hypersonic weapon is the Avangard hypersonic glide vehicle. It is derived from research and development programs dating back to Soviet times, but which were halted after the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War due to a lack of funding and changing geopolitical realities.Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 21, 2024
As America and the West comes to grips over the fact that Russia has launched an ICBM-capable missile in combat for the first time in history, we all might want to take some time contemplating how we got to this point, and we might find a path that leads us away from the inevitability of nuclear war with Russia.
1/5
Fortunately, there is a book that does just that: Disarmament in the Time of Perestroika.
This is a history/memoir that details the story of the implementation of the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty, and the role I played in setting up and operating a monitoring site outside the Soviet missile factory in Votkinsk.
2/5
The United States has walked away from arms control over the course of the last three decades; Donald Trump withdrew from the INF Treaty in 2019.
We faced a very dangerous situation in the 1980’s, with a nuclear arms race leading the US and Soviets on a path toward inevitable nuclear war.
The INF treaty saved us, and the world, from such a fate.
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Oct 31, 2023
Israel claims that a senior Hamas leader was in the Jabalia Refugee Camp when it was struck by Israeli bombs. Israel claims that the deaths of Palestinian refugees in the camp are collateral damage permitted under the law of war.

Israel is wrong.
Any discussion of collateral damage, however, must answer a threshold legal question whether or not the commander in question was actually inside the camp at the time of the strike.
Unless that question can be answered to a reasonable degree of certainty, a bombing operation of the sort carried out by Israel is unlawful, regardless of the level of collateral damage to surrounding persons and objects.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 2, 2023
1) For all those armchair generals who snipe at Russian military performance, reflect on what the US and NATO have and haven’t been doing for the past 20 years. Neither could survive long in the kind of war Ukraine and Russia are fighting today—it is beyond their imagination.
2) The use of massed fires is something NATO is incapable of doing—they lack the equipment and doctrine. The use of precision guided munitions is no substitute—the delivery systems will be rapidly attrited by Russian counter fires. Russian artillery supremacy is a game changer.
3) The perceived NATO air power advantage will melt away in the face of Russia’s integrated air defense network. Neither the US nor NATO has trained or operated against such a threat. And if Russia is able to nullify or neutralize US/NATO air power—checkmate.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 5, 2022
1/8 People are having trouble accessing this article given Twitter’s internal censorship. I’ve broken the article down into 8 images, which I will link in sequence. Image
Image
Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 29, 2022
1/ Big Arrow War—a primer. For all those scratching their heads in confusion, or dusting off their dress uniforms for the Ukrainian victory parade in Kiev, over the news about Russia’s “strategic shift”, you might want to re-familiarize yourself with basic military concepts.
2/ Maneuver warfare is a good place to start. Understand Russia started its “special military operation” with a severe manpower deficit—200,000 attackers to some 600,000 defenders (or more). Classic attritional conflict was never an option. Russian victory required maneuver.
3/ Maneuver war is more psychological than physical and focuses more on the operational than on the tactical level. Maneuver is relational movement—how you deploy and move your forces in relation to your opponent. Russian maneuver in the first phase of its operation support this.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(