When examined objectively, the amount of Jewish propaganda and influence used to goad the American public into World war 2 is astounding.
Let’s examine some of the films around that time.
Confessions of a Nazi Spy, 1939.
Directed by ✡️ Anatole Litvak
Produced by ✡️ Warner brothers. Real last Name Wonsal or Wonskolaser
Keep in mind the American public was very isolationist, and many Americans were German immigrants.
This movie is about a secret Nazi spy ring working to subvert the citizenry of America, which is ironic since this film is doing exactly that but subverting America for Jewish interest.
🧵 1/12
Beast Of Berlin- 1939
Director- ✡️ Sam Newfield
This movie is about a man and his wife leading an anti Nazi literature movement in Germany. In other words, it’s normalizing treason for “moral reasons.”
🧵 2/12
Escape- 1940
Director- ✡️ Mervyn LeRoy
A movie about an American going over to Germany to sneak someone out of a concentration camp….
🧵 3/12
Mortal Storm- 1940
The first production by MGM that dramatized the persecution of the Jews.
Producer- ✡️ Victor Saville
Production company- ✡️ MGM
Distribution company- ✡️ Loe’s
🧵 4/12
Foreign Correspondent- 1940
✡️- produced by Walter Wagner productions
This film is not entirely anti Nazi propaganda, only faintly.
At the end of the movie, the British war correspondent describes London being bombed by Germans, and “urging Americans to keep those lights burning” as his radio broadcast fades out.
Implicitly indicating America needs to help save Britain from Germany.
🧵 5/12
The Great Dictator- 1940
-Charlie Chaplin, who produced and acted in this film, was by all accounts not Jewish, but he had great sympathy to the Jewish cause.
The purpose of the film was to advance a strong condemnation of facist leaders, and portray Jews as persecuted.
🧵 6/12
Casablanca- 1942
-Distributed by ✡️ Warner Brothers
-Produced by ✡️ Hal Wallis
-Screenplay by ✡️ Julius and Phillip Epstein
-Directed by ✡️ Michael Curtiz
While clearly Casablanca is a romance story, the anti German undertones cannot be ignored. The main villain is German Major Strasser, and all the protagonist, while somewhat appearing neutral at times, certainly harbor positive feelings to the Free French movement. The bar owner of Casablanca fought on the “loyalist” or communist side of the Spanish Civil war.
While the propaganda is a little more subtle, it is propaganda nonetheless.
🧵 7/12
Sergeant York- 1941
Technically a movie about World War 1, but the story is that a Tennessee lad goes from being a bible believing conscientious objector, to massive German Killer.
The movie was used to inflame more German hatred after the attack of Pearl Harbor, and pro war sentiment generally.
It was the highest grossing film of 1941.
✡️- produced by Warner Brothers
🧵 8/12
To Be or Not to Be- 1942
A comedy film, but the effect of planting anti German sentiment is all the same. The plot concerns a troupe of actors in Nazi-occupied Warsaw who use their abilities at disguise and acting to fool the occupying troops.
-✡️ Directed by Ernst Lubitsch
-✡️ story by Melchior Lengyel
-✡️ screenplay by Edwin Justus Mayer
🧵 9/12
You may think, well what difference does it make. Jewish producers were producing movies in their ethnic interest. True. But 2 important things to note.
1. Was it in American interest to go to war?
2. Let’s imagine we had a bunch of German Americans running our media and producing films about how the Jews had ruined Germany during the Weimar Republic. How they dominated the German media, porn industry, and the like, and ran the country straight into the ground. How Hitler did not have a desire to take over the world, but that he was opposed to Marxism and saw the threat coming from the East. That the concentration camps were not “death camps” but work camps to support the war, that he did not declare on either Britain or France…
Would it change the way you view the world?
Of course it would. The media is the programmer, and you are the program.
🧵 10/12
Maybe Mel Gibson wasn’t so crazy after all…
🧵 11/12
If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via
Can White Nationalists be Christians and can Christians be White nationalists?
Great debate by @EMichaelJones1 and @CoreyJMahler . You can watch the full debate at @lporiginalg page. Here are some highlights.
“Jared Taylor’s job is to police the right wing movement, similar to William F Buckley years ago, and his job specifically is to make sure White guys don’t criticize Jews.”
-E. Michael Jones
🧵 1/10
“The Jews who accepted Christ or rejected Christ were not different in terms of DNA. It was theological. The Jew is a theological entity and his identity is based on the rejection of Jesus Christ, and when you reject Jesus Christ you become a revolutionary, which is what they have been for 2000 years.”
E. Michael Jones
🧵 2/10
“I agree that ethnically the Jews that Christ and carpeted Christ are of the same tribe, and just had a theological difference, but that’s not really what we are talking about here. The question is can we have White or a European unity within in a Christian framework. The answer is yes because we already have an example of this with the Holy Roman Empire.”
The NAACP, was never about the advancement of Black People for black interest…. It was a Jewish led movement for Jewish interest.
Let’s explain.
🧵 1/13
When you actually dig into the founding and funding of the NAACP, you find tons of Jewish/Communist influence.
The NAACP was founded in 1909.
Do you think blacks had enough financial backing and political influence to create this on their own? Not during that time.
Enter in the Jewish funding and leadership.
✡️ Financier- Jacob Schiff
✡️ Co-founder- Henry Moskowitz
✡️ Co-founder- Emil J. Hirsch
✡️ Co-founder- Lillian Wald
✡️ Co-Founder- Julius Rosenwald
Outside of the Jewish backers and financiers there were other Communist backers and founders. While not all were Jewish, they communist/ Marxist ideology still serves Jewish interests.
🧵2/13
Now the main question is why? What benefit would Jews have to push a social movement of integration and controlling black rights?
The answer is that Jews have a history of expulsion and of being ostracized in countries that are strong and homogeneous. Thus you will find tons of Jewish leadership in the most Social and Liberal movements that have helped break down Americas white Christian majority. They viewed them (Whites) as a threat, and they viewed the blacks as a useful tool to decimate that majority.
This is why they choose to elevate MLK, vs someone like Malcom X.
If there really was a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the White race, Jews would talk about it openly and try to claim it is “inevitable.”
🧵 1/20
There would be a Plan written down in a book like The Kalergi Plan, which is written in the book practical Idealism. It would describe the way to break down the White race so they could be ruled over by Jews.
🧵 2/20
The Term “melting Pot” would be made up by a Jew, to convince the masses it is a good thing to lose ethnic majorities of your own countries.
“I now understood the language of the Jewish people. I now knew they used language for disguising their thoughts, so that their real goals cannot be discovered by what they say, but only by reading between the lines.”
-Adolf Hitler
As uncomfortable as it may seem, Hitler is correct here. There are plenty of examples of this over recent American history. Let’s review some.
🧵 1/10
An obvious one is immigration. The Jewish controlled press constantly told us that they were concerned about the lives of the “migrants” but really they were working on destroying the white American majority.
Even ✡️ Jew Alejandro Mayorkas used his “experience” as an immigrant as an excuse for why he did such a poor job.
Jews do this because they historically get expelled from strong homogeneous societies, so they work on creating melting pots that they can exploit.
You have to read between the lines.
🧵 2/10
Jews like it when blacks are racist against whites, but as soon as a black person speaks up about Jewish power, they find out who really runs America.
The point is, Jews will promote anti white racism when it supports their interest. They are not against racism at all.