Post

https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1884691002486587875

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 9

For several years now, embalmers in multiple countries have reported unusual white fibrous structures being found inside the deceased.

The reports began appearing after the COVID injection rollout. Yet despite the public concern, there has been little visible effort from major health authorities to explain what these structures are, how common they may be, or what they could mean for the living.

Now, two peer-reviewed papers have pushed the issue into a more serious category. One documented survey reports from embalmers across multiple countries. The other analyzed the material itself and reported evidence consistent with amyloid-like, misfolded protein structures using Raman spectroscopy and other testing methods.

The unsettling part is not only that these structures may exist. It is that the question has been sitting in plain view for years while the institutions with the power, funding, and equipment to investigate it have largely stayed silent.

For tonight's special report, we are joined by journalist Wayne Crouch, U.S. embalmer Richard Hirschman, Major Tom Haviland, and organic chemist Greg Harrison. Together, they bring a rare mix of frontline embalming observations, multi-year survey work, investigative persistence, and analytical chemistry to one of the strangest unresolved questions of the post-COVID era. 🧵

The first major issue was the magnitude of the problem being ignored.

The embalmer survey paper did not treat the white fibrous clot phenomenon as a one-off claim from a single funeral home or a small group of activists. It gathered multi-year responses from embalmers in five countries, including the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand.

Across four years of surveys, 808 embalmers reportedly took part. Of those, 608 said they had seen the white fibrous structures. That’s more than 75% of respondents.

Even more striking was the reported frequency. These were not described as rare findings showing up once in a while under unusual circumstances. The average reported occurrence was around 23% of corpses.

That number is the kind of figure that should immediately trigger serious follow-up. Even if the exact cause remains disputed, even if some findings require further confirmation, even if additional controls are needed, the claim being raised is too large to ignore. When experienced embalmers say they began seeing something unfamiliar in bodies after 2021, the responsible response is not silence. It is investigation.

The timing also mattered. Some embalmers reported seeing unusual clotting in 2020, during the COVID era but before the vaccine rollout. However, the larger reported increase appeared in 2021, after the rollout began.

That distinction is important because it keeps the question broader than a single theory. The issue being raised is not only whether the injections played a role, but whether spike protein exposure from infection, injection, or both may be connected to abnormal clotting and protein misfolding.

At this stage, the survey did not prove causation. But it did document a pattern that many embalmers said they had not seen during decades of prior work.

And that is exactly why the matter should not be left to online debate alone.

Unless you have explicitly told your financial advisor to pull your money out of tech, you are fully invested in the AI bubble right now.

Nobody asked for your permission. Nobody had to.

Your 401(k) is on autopilot, and autopilot means the biggest names on Wall Street get to use your retirement to fund their AI bets. Larry Fink’s BlackRock alone manages $12 trillion of money just like yours.

If it pays off, they take the fees. If it pops, you hold the bag.

But there’s a way to opt out of the AI bubble, and Genesis Gold shows you how.

They put together a free guide with the whole picture. How exposed your retirement really is. What happens after the crash. And how to get your hard-earned money out before the bomb goes off.

Get it now at DailyPulseGold.com. That’s DailyPulseGold.com.

Read 10 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 6

A New York Times reporter did the unthinkable and exposed the “worst test in medicine” — the one that five decades of evidence says doesn’t work.

The research is damning: continuous fetal monitoring raises C-sections by 66% and instrumental deliveries by 16%, with no drop in infant deaths or disability.

It flags a problem that usually isn’t one, and doctors rush to cut the baby out.

It’s not just a false flag problem; it’s a money incentive. Sarah Kliff says the quiet part out loud:

“Nobody gets sued for doing the C-section. You only get sued for not doing the C-section.”

Doctors are so terrified of legal consequences that they’ll push unnecessary surgery on their patients, not for the baby’s health, but to protect their pocketbooks.

That’s how the cascade starts. In a hospital delivery, one intervention triggers the next. It’s like an avalanche that can’t be stopped.

Next thing you know, you’re recovering for weeks from a major surgery you never needed.

If someone you love is about to have their first baby, share this before they ever set foot in a labor and delivery unit.

@MidwesternDoc investigated what hospitals don’t tell you about birth outcomes, and it only gets worse from here. 🧵

For most of human history, childbirth happened at home, guided by a midwife who had already done this hundreds of times.

Today it’s one of the most heavily monitored, medicated, and surgical events in modern medicine.

Something clearly changed, and it’s not women’s bodies. They’re just as capable today as they were thousands of years ago.

But today, most parents walk into a delivery room having no idea what may happen next—or why.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-hidden-d…

Read 34 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 5

Big Pharma is “terrified” of Vitamin D, and Dr. Pierre Kory says he could spend a whole hour on this topic.

Why so scared?

Because “It threatens the DISEASE MODEL.”

A meta-analysis out of Italy found what happens when people take Vitamin D, and the results are staggering:

Looking at data from 19 different studies and 1.26 million individuals, the meta-analysis revealed:

• Vitamin D showed about a 60% effectiveness against the incidence of COVID-19 in randomized control trials.

• Vitamin D showed about 40-50% effectiveness in reducing the incidence of COVID-19 in observational studies.

• For preventing severe COVID-19 cases requiring ICU care, vitamin D supplementation was about 70% effective.

We didn’t need to lock ourselves inside for years, live in fear, and vilify our neighbors for not wearing a mask.

That was literally the worst thing we could have done.

All we ever needed was to go outside, get sunshine, and raise our vitamin D, and everything would have been so much better.

But the sunshine story goes far beyond COVID. You think you’re doing your health a favor by avoiding the sun?

The data tells a very different story, and it starts with 29,518 women who did exactly that. 🧵

For decades, Americans were told to treat the sun like poison.

Avoid it. Block it. Fear it. Wear sunscreen every day, everywhere, even when it’s cloudy.

But sunlight isn’t just a lifestyle preference.

It’s a biological necessity.

And the campaign against it may be one of the most successful and profitable fear campaigns in modern medicine.

Their message is simple:

Sunlight causes skin cancer.
Skin cancer can kill you.
Therefore, avoid the sun.

That sounds reasonable until you ask one question: What kind of skin cancer are we talking about?
Because “skin cancer” isn’t just one thing.

And with that simple question, the narrative starts to fall apart.

Read 32 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jul 1

If you thought COVID was built on a web of lies, wait till you hear what they did with Alzheimer’s disease.

While Big Pharma poured billions into failed drugs and fake plaque theories, one neurologist quietly proved the decline could be reversed.

And he did it without a single pharmaceutical.

Dr. Dale Bredesen discovered Alzheimer’s has five root causes, not one.

And when you treat those root causes, patients recover. 🧵

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-al…

In 1906, plaques in the brain were identified as the cause of Alzheimer’s disease.

By the 1980s, scientists discovered that those plaques were primarily composed of amyloid proteins.

And then in 1991, genetic mutations in a protein that gives rise to amyloid beta were linked to inherited forms of Alzheimer’s disease.

Read 30 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 29

At 17, Amy Tippins was dying of liver failure. A transplant saved her life.

After the surgery, she noticed “some of my traits had changed.”

Amy suddenly found herself drawn to hands-on home projects she’d never cared about.

“What gives?” she thought. So she tracked down the obituary of the stranger whose liver she’d received and discovered something staggering:

“Not long after surgery, some things about myself and some of my traits had changed… I really started to love projects like replacing flooring on my own. I never saw flooring being put in. I never saw anything like that being done.”

“I knew he was 47 and that he had been killed in a car wreck in Columbus, Georgia. So I went to the library and I started looking up obituaries for that time. And I backed into his obituary.”

“What I discovered is he was a police officer. He was 47, and his name was Mike. His sister told me that he did a lot of his own home renovation. He also liked to work with his hands. He liked to do projects.”

“When I found out who my donor was, it made a lot more sense on why some things about myself and some of my traits had changed after transplant.”

Is a donated organ just an organ? Or can it actually change who you are?

Conventional medicine laughs at the idea. But is it really so crazy?

Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵

When organ transplantation became possible, doctors called it a miracle. And it is. Giving someone a second life through another person’s death is incredible.

But the full story isn’t quite so simple.

Oftentimes, something else seems to come with the organ. Something nobody signed up for.

The standard model is pretty straightforward. Your heart is a pump. Your kidney is a filter. Personality and memory live in the brain, and nowhere else.

Swap a failing organ for a healthy one and you’ve simply updated the plumbing, not the person.

But that’s been nothing more than an assumption.

For decades, a significant number of cases has been building up that say otherwise.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-mystery-…

Read 30 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Jun 26

Before the hepatitis B vaccine was mandated for kids to attend school in almost all 50 states, the risk of a baby dying from hepatitis B was 1 in 7 million.

“That means you need to give 7 MILLION hepatitis B vaccines to prevent ONE death,” RFK Jr. says.

When you give 7 million vaccines to save one life, you’d better make damn sure it’s safe.

But is it really? Let’s take a look at the evidence. 🧵

Every newborn in America is pushed toward a Hepatitis B vaccine within hours of being born.

And that sounds completely normal to most people because the policy has been normalized for decades.

But when you take a close look at Hepatitis B, the risk group, the benefit math, and the forgotten safety record, the birth-dose policy becomes very difficult to defend.

Hepatitis B is a real disease.

Chronic infection can damage the liver, lead to liver failure, and increase the risk of liver cancer later in life.

That part is not the dispute.

The dispute is whether every newborn, including babies born to mothers who test negative for Hepatitis B, should receive the vaccine on their very first day of life.

Read 30 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!