Vatnik Soup Profile picture
Feb 2, 2025 26 tweets 13 min read Read on X
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I talk about populism. Populism includes a range of political stances with the focus on the idea of the “common people” in opposition to the “elites”. In recent decades, populism has been on the rise around the world,and especially in the US & Europe.
1/25 Image
At its core, populism pits “the people” against “the elites.” It’s a political approach that claims to represent the common folk, often oversimplifying complex issues and tapping into frustrations. Populism can be left-wing, right-wing, or somewhere in between.
2/25 Image
In the US and Canada during the 19th and early 20th century, populist sentiments often came from the small independent farmers, “the people”, who were opposing the bankers and politicians, or “the elites”. The People’s Party in the US was considered…

3/25 Image
…to be “one of the defining populist movements,” and they often rallied around socialist issues, such as nationalization of railroads, stronger unions, referendums, and so on. Another popular movement was Share Our Wealth, demanding a re-distribution of wealth in the US.

4/25 Image
The 2010s were the golden age of populism: Trump’s MAGA and “America First”, Brexit’s “Take Back Control”, Lula’s "working class" populism, Modi’s appeal to Hindu nationalism, and Orbán’s “illiberal democracy” are at the heart of modern populism.

5/25 Image
Image
Image
Image
The 2008 financial crisis can be considered the starting point of this era, as it wrecked trust in institutions and governments, who were mostly focusing on bailing out the banks. Economic inequality created fertile ground for anti-elite rhetoric. The crisis created two…

6/25 Image
Image
…anti-establishment movements in the US: the Occupy movement & the Tea Party movement. The former protested against the super-rich & was mostly non-partisan, whereas the latter was built around the Republican Party and was made popular by Rand Paul:
7/25
Image
Image
But it took a few more years before populism became the opium for the masses. To gain power, populists harnessed one of the most powerful political tools in the world: social media. Since “the people” were active on social media platforms like Facebook…

8/25 Image
…populist spin doctors saw a massive opportunity in it. Algorithms boosted polarizing content, helping them bypass traditional media gatekeepers. Memes, outrage, and viral soundbites became powerful political tools. Quickly, populism became a social media-era phenomenon.

9/25 Image
Image
In 2016, the US presidential elections were mostly characterized by populism and anti-establishment rhetoric. Both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump actually agreed on many issues, including trade deals. Both were also claiming to speak “for the people”.

10/25 Image
Donald Trump’s rise to power is a textbook example of modern populism in action. He positioned himself as a political outsider, tapping into the anger and disillusionment of voters who felt left behind by globalization and ignored by traditional politicians.

11/25 Image
Trump’s “America First” agenda spoke to those who believed global trade deals and immigration policies were hurting American workers. His rhetoric about “bad deals” and “open borders” resonated deeply with those who saw themselves as victims of these trends.

12/25 Image
Image
He weaponized social media like no other politician before him. By bypassing mainstream media and communicating directly with supporters on platforms like Twitter, Trump spread his message unfiltered, often using inflammatory language to dominate news cycles.

13/25 Image
Image
His campaign drew on cultural anxieties, framing issues like immigration in ways that heightened divisions and appealed to nationalistic sentiments. His slogan, “Make America Great Again” implied that the country’s greatness had been stolen by the corrupt elites.

14/25 Image
And nobody does populism better than Trump. A draft-dodger who was born to wealth and inherited over 400 million USD from his father has been able to position himself as the representative of “regular folk”, framing all of his opponents as part of the “global elites”.

15/25 Image
Image
But later, Trump’s populism turned into something completely different – a cult. Today, many Trump supporters consider him to be a God-like being whose main mission is still to “drain the swamp” and “Make America Great Again”. This cult doesn’t seem to mind that…

16/25 Image
Image
Image
…the president has surrounded himself with the wealthiest people in the world, and his tax proposal focuses on making himself and these people even more rich. At the same time, he’s imposing massive tariffs that will end up hurting the US lower and middle classes.

17/25 Image
Populists thrive on anti-elitism but often become the elite. For example, Trump promised to fight “the swamp” yet filled his administration with insiders. Viktor Orbán decries corruption yet consolidates wealth among loyalists and family members:

18/25

Image
Today, populism is a political movement that thrives by telling simple, emotionally compelling stories appealing to a shared - often nationalistic or tribal - identity, while scapegoating minorities, immigrants, or global institutions as the root of all societal problems.

19/25 Image
Populism can sometimes address legitimate grievances, but it tends to oversimplify complex issues and erode trust in institutions. Populist leaders often undermine democracy by concentrating power, dismissing experts, and framing themselves as the sole voice of the people.
20/25
Why does populism work so well right now? Social media supercharges populist rhetoric by making it easy to spread narratives quickly and cost-effectively across societies. With rising energy prices and inflation, populists offer quick solutions to complex global problems.

21/25 Image
Image
Image
In Europe, right-wing populism peaked around 2014, with Le Pen, Salvini, and Wilders as the populist superstars. Their parties gained significant seats in the European Parliament. Today, we see a similar trend in Germany (AfD), Romania (Georgescu), and the UK (Reform).

22/25 Image
Image
Image
Image
Putin also exhibits certain populist traits, but labeling him purely as a populist oversimplifies his leadership style & strategy. Even though Putin’s leadership is more accurately described as a blend of authoritarianism & nationalism,he has also used “strategic populism”.
23/25 Image
For example, he promotes himself as the protector of Russia’s sovereignty and traditions. He often unifies the Russian citizens with (false) historical narratives. He also positions himself as an “anti-elitist” fighting against “Western elites and globalists”.

24/25 Image
To conclude, populism is a political idea that pits “the people” against “the elites”. Ironically, those who resort to populism often come from positions of power: media moguls, wealthy businessmen, and South African oligarchs who use populism to their advantage.

25/25 Image
You can now pre-order the 2nd edition of my book! This updated version, featuring pre-order extras, will be released on 15th of February 2025.

Pre-order your copy here:

kleart.eu/webshop/p/vatn…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vatnik Soup

Vatnik Soup Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @P_Kallioniemi

Feb 1
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal.
1/5 Image
Image
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic.
2/5 Image
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not.
3/5 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.

Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield.
1/5 Image
Image
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end.
2/5 Image
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5 Image

Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd:
1/5 Image
Image
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin.
2/5
Image
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite.
3/5
vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.

1/20 Image
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.

2/20 Image
Image
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.

3/20 Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 28
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.

Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military.
1/5 Image
Image
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield.
2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts.
3/5 Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 10
In this first (and maybe last?) Basiji Soup, we’ll look at… the Islamic Republic of Iran, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, how it sells its atrocities as virtue and its repression as morality, how it serves the Kremlin, and the current protests against it.

1/20 Image
Basijis are members of the most fanatical part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In a broader sense: Iranian regime loyalists & propagandists. They may be fewer than vatniks or wumaos, but the goal is the same: destabilize the West to protect a brutal regime.

2/20 Image
The regime oppressing Iran is a “theocratic” authoritarian state around a “Supreme Leader” hiding behind religion to justify its crimes: censorship, repression, executions, torture and terror — similar to Russia and its “holy war” against Ukraine.

3/20
Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(