Dan Neidle Profile picture
Feb 4 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
There are companies worth £50bn* based in this terraced house in Bolton.

Turns out they also have a bank. With a valid VAT registration number.

(*on paper) Image
Image
And a holding company, with a professional-looking website: Image
And audited accounts that are superficially plausible, if you ignore the £15bn turnover for an unknown company. And tiny tiny clues the accounts were plagiarised from elsewhere. Like a sentence saying they're a "leading supplier of components to the door and window industry". Image
Image
The audit certificate is a forgery. I've spoken to the audit firm and individual auditor named in these accounts and I'm convinced they have nothing to do with this. They don't even know each other.
We called their phone number; it gives the option of "sales" or "customer services", but both just go through to a maillbox.
Their website says they're FCA authorised. A lie - the number is a different, legit, firm. Image
So obviously the VAT number will be fake as well, right?

Wrong. Image
The first draft of our report said we didn't know if these companies were created for fraud or as the product of someone's fantasy...
However the additional information we've received (the bank website, VAT registration, and the attempt to win business for Avantulo SA Ltd) makes reasonably clear this is a fraud.
The domain records for the two Stallion Holdings websites suggest the fraud is ongoing. Image
Image
Our report on fake banks is here, including simple steps Companies House could take to end the fraudulent use of UK companies with fake accounts. taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/02/01/fin…
And a report from @MarpleLeaf at The Business Desk here: thebusinessdesk.com/northwest/news…
Just to add: the Stallion Facebook pages suggests the fraud is aimed at Muslims: facebook.com/stallionholidi…
And the Facebook reveals they don't just do bank fraud: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Neidle

Dan Neidle Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanNeidle

Feb 5
Our latest update: mistakes by Companies House and the Financial Conduct Authority resulted in fraudsters obtaining FCA authorisation. A thread:
In 2017, the fraudsters applied for FCA registration for a company called Stallion Financial Investments plc. Here's its balance sheet, showing £12m of assets. Image
The FCA refused the application; initially for reasons that aren't stated, but then because the company didn't respond to its queries. Fairly suspicious. Image
Image
Read 15 tweets
Feb 3
What's better than a mystery? A free app.

I have both this morning.

I'll link to the app in the next tweet. It lets you identify suspicious companies on Companies House, searching either by their business category or their address.

The mystery follows after that. Image
Here's the app link - should work nicely on mobile, and on iPhone if you "save to desktop" it will behave like an app. taxpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/ass…
The mystery is why the suspicious companies, with their phoney balance sheets, are so concentrated in just a few addresses. There are 116 at 124 City Road. Check out all the fake banks. taxpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/ass…Image
Read 13 tweets
Feb 1
Fraudsters are setting up fake banks on Companies House - here's how we found 16 in three minutes... using an automated tool we've just made freely available.

Thread: Image
There's a longer version of this thread here, with details of the fake banks we found, and how to download/use the tool. taxpolicy.org.uk/finding_fake_b…
Anyone can set up a company on Companies House, and say it's a bank. It's a simple trick. You can't put the word "bank" in a company's name without permission from the regulator. You can pick the bank "category". And then tell the world you're a bank. Image
Image
Read 25 tweets
Jan 31
The world's biggest company isn’t Apple or Amazon—it’s a UK firm called Novateur, with £100 trillion in assets.

Incredible? Yes.
True? Kind of.
Real? Not remotely.

It's a blatant fraud. Here’s how Companies House missed it - and how they could stop these frauds for good. Image
We published a report on Saturday on Avis Capital Limited. It claims to be a "bank" and to have £58bn of net assets and 150,000 employees. But none of that is true; it filed fake accounts as part of what we believe was an international fraud. taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/01/25/the…
So how others like Avis Capital are out there?

We locked a nerd (me) in a room for a day and created an automated tool that searches for suspicious companies.
Read 22 tweets
Jan 25
This is the HQ of Avis Capital. It claims to be one of the largest companies in the UK, with £58bn in assets and 31% returns promised to investors.

Except it's all a lie.

Here's how regulatory failures are letting international fraudsters create massive fake UK companies. Image
Our new report is here:

Thread: taxpolicy.org.uk/2025/01/25/the…Image
Avis Capital claims to have been spun out of the Avis car hire group in 2005. It wasn't. It has no connection to the real Avis. Image
Read 25 tweets
Jan 20
Douglas Barrowman sold a possibly criminal, tax avoidance scheme using an Isle of Man company called Principal Contracts Ltd. The Isle of Man authorities say it failed to file accounts, paid unlawful dividends, & failed to pay £5m of Isle of Man VAT.

Guess what happened next? Image
PCL sold tax avoidance schemes which replaced normal taxable employment income with supposedly non-taxable loans.

The schemes never worked, but HMRC failed to challenge them in the usual way. In a panic, the Government introduced a "loan charge" to tax the loans. Image
Barrowman's response? He sold his clients/victims a new scheme that involved writing letters saying the loans had been repaid. They hadn't. It just wasn't true.

The new scheme was shocking in its brazenness, and should have been investigated as criminal tax fraud. It wasn't. Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(