🧵🧵DOGE - A Lawyer’s Perspective on the @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Policy Centerpiece
I inherently do not trust the media so I decided to look into DOGE myself and see what is under the hood. Initially I was quite concerned about the legality of a “new agency” created by executive order but that - just like everything else - is a lie put out by the mainstream. The order is here and the thread is below:
@VigilantFox
To understand anything the government does it’s usually best to start with the law or something else I might be able to sue over… in this case the executive order itself was the thing to see.
As you can see this document is barely 2 pages and certainly not written in legalise. While not a complicated read - the plan was brilliant. Trump did NOT actually create a new agency. Instead what he did was repurpose an existing agency - the USDS - into something more useful.
The USDS was an Obamacare office created to make government software better. They were essentially software development for the bureaucracy. Trump renamed the United States Digital Service (USDS) the United States DOGE Service which even kept the acronym the same. Not only did repurposing an appropriate existing department allow Trump to ensure there was funding for DOGE without having to fight with Congress - he also ensured its legality.
You see Trump has power to set priorities for Executive branch departments but there are limits. In the case of DOGE, Trump clearly had a team of lawyers looking at ways to accomplish this goal legally.
USDS was already there and funded for the specific purpose. 44 USCS Chapter 36 is the law that facilitates much of USDS. It is generally about developing tech for the government. This means that focusing on efficiency and evaluating the entire government through the lens of the IT that runs it is not really substantially altering the agency - just its focus.
At the same time Trump also wanted to bring in @elonmusk (and at the time @VivekGRamaswamy) and his team for an initial major audit/clean sweep. To do this Trump referenced another law 5 USC 3161. This law governs the creation of and staffing for what is known as a “temporary organization” in the government. This group will focus on pushing the DOGE agenda and will exist for 18 months (though their work will survive). By including this group as temporary, Trump dodged several potential lawsuits as he may not have been able to create his own new administrative entity on a permanent basis without Congressional approval.
Trump also ordered that DOGE teams be hired in every administrative branch agency. These teams are to include a team lead, a lawyer, an HR person, and an engineer. These teams work for USDS (DOGE) but work with and within various agencies. While all this is part of a “software modernization initiative,” looking at the software and how things are managed is a great way to find out where there is waste - particularly when part of the mandate it to ensure efficiency.
The last part of the post is all important boilerplate. Trump orders all agencies to support the DOGE initiative, disclaims any other prior EOs that could interfere with this order, and makes a conflict of laws statement. This was further insulation to make this harder for political opponents to fight in court.
Last point. I don’t like that this has to be done and think the executive branch has far more authority than they should. That said, this order was very well done and Trump and Musk have really done a good job strategically here. Here’s to hoping these guys follow through on the MAGA/MAHA mandate that we the people have given and do everything possible to ensure the American people have the best future imaginable for our kids.
Check this thread out too for info on the USAID lies by the media:
So how bad is California really? It's bad... and it's about to get worse. California is trying to pass some of the worst and most dangerous legislation in the country. Thanks to my friend @NicolePearsonJD for the great insight. @VigilantFox
BAD BILLS RUN DOWN: All of these bills are on the Governor's desk for signing or veto by October 12 and can be signed any day making California a dangerous state for every child in the country.
SB 59 (Wiener, D, SF): currently in California, only the petitions for birth record changes (name, sex, gender marker) of minors are sealed. SB 59 would make it so that the petitions of adults are also sealed. You know, so that child and their predator can have their identities erased without anyone knowing. SB 59 also imposes a minimum fine of $5,000.00 for revealing the petitions, in addition to punitive damages, which you know will be liberally awarded to prevent "trans hate." leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavC…
AB 1084 (Zbur, D, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Hollywood): will eliminate the mechanism to file objections to birth record change petitions (name, sex, gender) of adults, including the requirement that there first be a hearing in uncontested cases, and will expedite the ordering of such changes (6 weeks). With respect to minors, currently a name change petition requires a hearing, an order to show cause, opportunity for objection, and a separate judgment process. If AB 1084 passes, and the petition is signed by all living parents, the court must grant the name change without hearing and within 6 weeks after filing. If it is not signed by all parents, the court must serve the non-signing parent and allow objections; however, the hearing will not be set unless a (1) timely objection is filed and (2) the objecting parent shows "good cause." AB 1084 does not define "good cause" but does specifically state that objections based solely on a belief that the proposed change is not the petitioner’s “actual gender identity” or objections based on “biological sex” are not "good cause" and are actually barred from being considered to trigger a hearing, or prevent the change being made. AB 1084 will also expedite the order of minor's petitions -- consented or objected -- to 6 weeks so, if a parent does not timely receive notice, their opportunity could be waived if they do not act immediately.
AB 1084 allows a single petition to handle both name change and recognition of change in gender/sex identifier, including issuance of updated vital records (birth, marriage certificates, etc.), where, currently, these are two separate petitions and proceedings, thereby eliminating interested parties' notice and opportunity to be heard on the same.
Finally, AB 1084 expedites issuance of new vital records within 2 weeks of entry of order.
🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Merck has released a potentially very dangerous saRNA product for pets with NO study on the potential to shed self amplifying mRNA to humans or other animals!!!
The Nobivac product was NOT tested for shedding to humans and no one knows how this self amplifying material will impact people or other animals exposed to it via shedding. In fact no proper shedding studies were done at all but it’s very likely that shedding will happen.
🧵🚨🚨🚨BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨: Grok admits it is misleading the public AND that:
“There is legitimate reason to be concerned that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may have contributed to PRESIDENT BIDEN’S stage 4 prostate cancer or its aggressive nature.”
The good news is that Grok can get to truth when you point out real data and the new info from Grok is SHOCKING. @elonmusk @johnrich @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox
President Biden may not be my favorite president but I would not wish cancer on anyone. That said we need to critically ask questions about what is happening and if we can learn from Biden’s experience we should.
@grok has been used to “fact check” me but my work has uncovered real evidence demonstrating Grok was incorrect so I challenged Grok to see if we could get to the truth and the results are here.
Whatever you think about my work, I’m pretty solid at dealing with fake fact checks at this point so I set out to see if Grok would act only as a propaganda tool or if it could learn and admit mistakes. As you will see I was pleasantly surprised but am concerned that @grok will not reflect its newfound knowledge to everyone that asks whether Biden’s cancer is related to the mRNA COVID vaccines.
🚨🧵BREAKDOWN: SCOTUS grants TRO delaying Trump’s removal of illegals under the Alien Enemies Act.
This is pretty viral already and I wanted to provide some context. The SCOTUS just ordered that Trump halt deportations under the AEA for a limited class. This was done in response to a case where a group of detained illegals were told they were being removed.
This is all based on the separate case that Bondi was just on Fox News telling everyone she won - it was definitely not a win if you care about accomplishing Trump’s agenda. Here’s what is really happening with this and part of the reason I’ve been so frustrated with the DOJ:
@HealthRanger @annvandersteel
The case in question is in a district court in Texas. The litigants claim they are in eminent risk of deportation without a hearing (they probably are).
After the separate 5-4 ruling at the SCOTUS in Trump v JGG, Bondi went on a Fox News victory tour telling everyone the case was a big win and that she was coming after the bad guys. The problem was that it was really not a win at all.
🧵🧵🧵 UNDERSTANDING TRUMP’S TARIFFS: After selling out during COVID, RINO Ben Shapiro now demonstrates his allegiance to globalist big business again by promoting the continuance of America last policies. Sadly, the lies about tariffs are being repeated everywhere. So what’s really happening?
The sad reality is that over regulation and a push by globalist big business leaders to reap the benefits of increased margins at the expense of the American worker has lead us to a situation where America has a dying middle class and produces almost nothing. Let’s me explain: (thread follows)
Share if you care!
Price frequently dictates sales and the less expensive item usually sells more. Corporate leadership wants to make products as inexpensive as possible so they can keep their products cheap enough to sell a lot of them but still make the most money possible per product. The difference between the cost to make a product and the price of the product is the profit margin.
The cost to take a product to market varies greatly based on the country you build it in. Costs include things like the price of labor, costs related to regulatory or legal burdens, whether the country produces its own raw resources the product will be made from or whether they have to be shipped in, currency exchanges, and the cost to ship the product to where it’s being sold, etc.
🧵🧵🧵Who is REALLY behind the Tesla Attacks?
Anything owned or supported by @elonmusk is under attack at the moment. The left and others that have traditionally benefited from government corruption hate DOGE and Musk’s support for Trump so they make absurd accusations like suggesting Musk made a Na$I salute.
In light of what appears to be a coordinated and no holds barred attack on Musk is it fair to argue that the left is coordinated to attack Tesla?
I know the answer seems apparent but I want to make the argument because I think the DOJ needs to be investigating the conspiracy to facilitate these crimes along with prosecuting the individuals carrying out these crimes. Take a look and let me know if you agree in the comments.
I’d argue that the attacks on Tesla facilities exhibit a widespread and consistent pattern that suggests more than isolated incidents. Since January 2025, Tesla properties have been targeted in at least nine U.S. states—Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, South Carolina, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Kansas, and Texas—as reported by the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) on March 20, 2025, and supported by CNN (March 25, 2025). Internationally, similar incidents have occurred in Canada, France, and the United Kingdom, per Wikipedia’s “2025 Tesla vandalism” entry. These attacks consistently involve arson (often with Molotov cocktails), gunfire, and vandalism, marked by politically charged graffiti such as “RESIST” (Las Vegas, March 18, 2025, per CNN), “Nazi” (Loveland, Colorado, per NPR, March 20, 2025), and “Fuck Trump” (South Carolina, per ABC News, March 19, 2025). The CSIS report (March 19, 2025) notes these incidents predominantly occur outside business hours, minimizing casualties, and employ uniform tactics—improvised incendiary devices and firearms—indicating a replicable methodology across regions.
Parallel to these physical attacks, a notable media campaign against Musk and DOGE has emerged, amplifying the perception of a coordinated effort. Outlets like CNN (March 10, 2025) have reported extensively on Tesla vandalism, often framing it within Musk’s DOGE role, while NBC News (March 12, 2025) highlights a “dozen” incidents tied to his federal workforce cuts, suggesting a backlash narrative. The Washington Post (March 8, 2025) describes a “string of violence” exacerbating Tesla’s woes, linking it to Musk’s political perch, and The Guardian (March 15, 2025) details his $100 billion fortune drop amid DOGE criticism. Posts on X, such as from @Bubblebathgirl (March 16, 2025), argue that CNN “actively promotes” these attacks. Collectively, this media focus—spanning CNN, NBC, The Washington Post, and others—consistently ties Tesla’s physical targeting to Musk’s Trump-aligned DOGE activities, often with critical undertones, raising questions of narrative alignment.