🧵🧵🧵 Digital ID is now the law in the United States & it is being implemented as we speak.

As a lawyer - the destruction of our privacy rights is making me sick. It is getting worse by the day and people seem unaware that it’s happening.

The implementation of digital ID in the U.S. is not driven by a single law, but rather by updates to existing regulations, primarily based on the “Patriot Act,” post-9/11, trade our freedom for security mindset.

The most relevant laws facilitate digital identification through state-issued Mobile Driver's Licenses (mDLs) and set the foundational technical requirements.

This thread gives an overview of the laws and regulations, along with the relevant text, that provide and facilitate digital ID in the United States.
@VigilantFox @RealAlexJones 1. Foundational Federal Law: The REAL ID Act of 2005

This law, codified in 49 U.S.C. § 30301 note, established minimum security standards for state-issued driver's licenses and identification cards to be accepted for federal purposes (like boarding commercial flights). Although it governs physical IDs, its mandates for "digital" features and databases laid the groundwork for modern digital ID. This law was updated with the REAL ID Modernization Act signed into law as part of a larger bill in 2020.

Relevant Text from the REAL ID Act of 2005 (Title II, Sec. 202)

The Act sets the minimum information and features required on an acceptable ID. These include key digital components that paved the way for digital ID:
Requirement:
Relevant Text (Summary of Sec. 202(b))
Digital Photo
"(5) A digital photograph of the person..."
Machine-Readable Tech
"(9) A common machine-readable technology, with defined minimum data elements."

So how bad is California really? It's bad... and it's about to get worse. California is trying to pass some of the worst and most dangerous legislation in the country. Thanks to my friend @NicolePearsonJD for the great insight. @VigilantFox BAD BILLS RUN DOWN: All of these bills are on the Governor's desk for signing or veto by October 12 and can be signed any day making California a dangerous state for every child in the country.

SB 59 (Wiener, D, SF): currently in California, only the petitions for birth record changes (name, sex, gender marker) of minors are sealed. SB 59 would make it so that the petitions of adults are also sealed. You know, so that child and their predator can have their identities erased without anyone knowing. SB 59 also imposes a minimum fine of $5,000.00 for revealing the petitions, in addition to punitive damages, which you know will be liberally awarded to prevent "trans hate."
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavC…

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: Merck has released a potentially very dangerous saRNA product for pets with NO study on the potential to shed self amplifying mRNA to humans or other animals!!!

The Nobivac product was NOT tested for shedding to humans and no one knows how this self amplifying material will impact people or other animals exposed to it via shedding. In fact no proper shedding studies were done at all but it’s very likely that shedding will happen.

Careful with doggy kisses going forward.

@VigilantFox @RealAlexJones @G_W_Forum
Here’s a white paper i did on saRNA -

https://twitter.com/renztom/status/1923727439810773199

🧵🚨🚨🚨BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨: Grok admits it is misleading the public AND that:

“There is legitimate reason to be concerned that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may have contributed to PRESIDENT BIDEN’S stage 4 prostate cancer or its aggressive nature.”

The good news is that Grok can get to truth when you point out real data and the new info from Grok is SHOCKING. @elonmusk @johnrich @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox President Biden may not be my favorite president but I would not wish cancer on anyone. That said we need to critically ask questions about what is happening and if we can learn from Biden’s experience we should.

@grok has been used to “fact check” me but my work has uncovered real evidence demonstrating Grok was incorrect so I challenged Grok to see if we could get to the truth and the results are here.

🚨🧵BREAKDOWN: SCOTUS grants TRO delaying Trump’s removal of illegals under the Alien Enemies Act.

This is pretty viral already and I wanted to provide some context. The SCOTUS just ordered that Trump halt deportations under the AEA for a limited class. This was done in response to a case where a group of detained illegals were told they were being removed.

This is all based on the separate case that Bondi was just on Fox News telling everyone she won - it was definitely not a win if you care about accomplishing Trump’s agenda. Here’s what is really happening with this and part of the reason I’ve been so frustrated with the DOJ:

@HealthRanger @annvandersteel
The case in question is in a district court in Texas. The litigants claim they are in eminent risk of deportation without a hearing (they probably are).

🧵🧵🧵 UNDERSTANDING TRUMP’S TARIFFS: After selling out during COVID, RINO Ben Shapiro now demonstrates his allegiance to globalist big business again by promoting the continuance of America last policies. Sadly, the lies about tariffs are being repeated everywhere. So what’s really happening?

The sad reality is that over regulation and a push by globalist big business leaders to reap the benefits of increased margins at the expense of the American worker has lead us to a situation where America has a dying middle class and produces almost nothing. Let’s me explain: (thread follows)

Share if you care! Price frequently dictates sales and the less expensive item usually sells more. Corporate leadership wants to make products as inexpensive as possible so they can keep their products cheap enough to sell a lot of them but still make the most money possible per product. The difference between the cost to make a product and the price of the product is the profit margin.

🧵🧵🧵Who is REALLY behind the Tesla Attacks?

Anything owned or supported by @elonmusk is under attack at the moment. The left and others that have traditionally benefited from government corruption hate DOGE and Musk’s support for Trump so they make absurd accusations like suggesting Musk made a Na$I salute.

In light of what appears to be a coordinated and no holds barred attack on Musk is it fair to argue that the left is coordinated to attack Tesla?

I know the answer seems apparent but I want to make the argument because I think the DOJ needs to be investigating the conspiracy to facilitate these crimes along with prosecuting the individuals carrying out these crimes. Take a look and let me know if you agree in the comments. I’d argue that the attacks on Tesla facilities exhibit a widespread and consistent pattern that suggests more than isolated incidents. Since January 2025, Tesla properties have been targeted in at least nine U.S. states—Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, South Carolina, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Kansas, and Texas—as reported by the FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) on March 20, 2025, and supported by CNN (March 25, 2025). Internationally, similar incidents have occurred in Canada, France, and the United Kingdom, per Wikipedia’s “2025 Tesla vandalism” entry. These attacks consistently involve arson (often with Molotov cocktails), gunfire, and vandalism, marked by politically charged graffiti such as “RESIST” (Las Vegas, March 18, 2025, per CNN), “Nazi” (Loveland, Colorado, per NPR, March 20, 2025), and “Fuck Trump” (South Carolina, per ABC News, March 19, 2025). The CSIS report (March 19, 2025) notes these incidents predominantly occur outside business hours, minimizing casualties, and employ uniform tactics—improvised incendiary devices and firearms—indicating a replicable methodology across regions.

🧵🧵🧵 JFK Files - What do they tell us?

The new JFK files drop still has redactions and a lot of important info simply is not there. I am reviewing but decided to work with Grok to see what is and is not there and what it means. Yep - I listened to @elonmusk and just Grokked it.

So who killed JFK? Read on for what Grok and I came up with. @RealAlexJones @realJoeHoft @Firstladyoflove The assassination of President John F. Kennedy on November 22, 1963, has long been a subject of intense debate, with the official narrative asserting that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. However, the release of approximately 80,000 pages of JFK files under Executive Order 14176, signed by President Donald Trump on January 23, 2025—including 2,400 additional documents discovered by the FBI in February 2025—alongside decades of prior disclosures, invites a critical reassessment. While these files do not deliver a definitive "smoking gun" to dismantle the Warren Commission’s lone-gunman conclusion, they amplify existing doubts and, when combined with probable interpretations of still-redacted content, point to a more complex "true story" involving a conspiracy. For my part I think there is a lot we do not yet know but ultimately there seems to be little question that this was an inside job.

🧵🧵🧵Lawyer's Perspective: Can the NATO Treaty force America into WWIII so our kids have to die for Ukraine?

@RealAlexJones shared this video of Zelensky saying that American troops - our sons and daughters would have to die in a war with Russia over Ukraine if Article 5 of NATO is triggered. So is this true or is it nonsense from a corrupt tyrant wannabe?

And for people with a Ukraine flag in your status bar how do you feel about your kids dying in Ukraine?

@VigilantFox @KanekoaTheGreat @GuntherEagleman The North Atlantic Treaty, which established NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization), was signed on April 4, 1949, and has been ratified by its member states. The treaty came into force on August 24, 1949, after the ratification process was completed by the original 12 founding members: Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

The treaty was ratified in the United States and is generally considered partially self-executing.

🧵If LAW: The law related to witness tampering may apply to the SDNY Epstein corruption.

18 USC 1512 states that whoever threatens or corruptly persuades another person to withhold a record may have committed a crime. It is hard to believe that one of the bosses in SDNY did not decide to withhold the records of the Epstein investigation from Pam Bondi.

This is NOT a slam dunk case but hear me out. The SDNY was not properly investigating the case. There have been no charges and there is almost certainly evidence to demonstrate MANY crimes.

Thread continues…
If these guys were not investigating something as egregious as pedophilia and child trafficking we have to ask ourselves why.

I was on with @RealAlexJones tonight and we talked about the FACT that lab grown meat is essentially eating cancer. So I asked Grok. Initially Grok took the mainstream position but after debating with me Grok admitted that:

1. Lab grown meat is essentially derived from cancer cell lines and that most people and experts would agree.
2. The real reason the Bill Gates lab meat crew won’t tell you this is because no one would want to eat cancer meat.

Moral of the story is that Alex Jones was right again - lab grown meat is really cancer meat. Enjoy.

The debate I had to get Grok to understand this was lengthy but @elonmusk is right - this is a very good tool. Feel free to read through and tell me where I’m wrong - Grok couldn’t.

@SecKennedy needs to ban this garbage immediately or sooner… this conversation doesn’t even touch on the lack of testing or oversight for these disgusting food substitutes.

@VigilantFox @MarioNawfal @GuntherEagleman

THIS WAS CUT OFF OF THE END OF QUESTION 3: It hinges on trust and how much we really know about these tweaked cells. What’s your gut telling you—do you buy the “controlled enough” line, or does that engineered immortality feel too close to the edge? Question 1 + Answer**  
**Human:** Is there any evidence that lab grown meat is derived from cell lines that include cancer  

**Grok:** There’s been a lot of chatter about whether lab-grown meat is made from cancer cells, especially with claims floating around that it’s derived from "immortalized" cell lines that are somehow cancerous. Let’s break this down with what’s actually known.

Lab-grown meat, or cultivated meat, is produced by taking cells from an animal—usually stem cells from muscle or fat tissue—and growing them in a controlled environment with a nutrient-rich broth. The goal is to mimic the texture and flavor of traditional meat without raising and slaughtering animals. Some companies use "immortalized" cell lines, which are cells tweaked to divide indefinitely. This is a big deal because normal cells stop dividing after a certain number of cycles, and for large-scale production, you need cells that keep going.

Here’s where the cancer question comes in: immortalized cells sound a bit like cancer cells, which also divide endlessly. Some critics point to this and say, “See, it’s cancer meat!” For example, a Bloomberg piece from early 2023 noted that some startups use immortalized cells, which can, in rare cases, share traits with precancerous or cancerous cells—like unlimited division. Social media posts on X and certain blogs have run with this, claiming lab-grown meat is basically tumor tissue, sometimes even tying it to HeLa cells (a famous human cancer cell line from Henrietta Lacks). But that’s where the trail gets murky.

The reality? No solid evidence shows that lab-grown meat is made from actual cancer cells. Experts, including the FDA, say the cells used are selected for their ability to grow well in a bioreactor—not for tumor-forming tendencies. The FDA has flat-out said claims about cancer or precancerous cells in cultivated meat are false. They’re typically stem cells from healthy animals, not cancerous tissue. Companies like UPSIDE Foods and Believer Meats, which got U.S. approval in 2023 to sell lab-grown chicken, have to prove their cells are safe and stable—no cancer-like behavior allowed. A UN Food and Agriculture Organization report backs this up, finding no cancer risk in the process.

Now, immortalization does raise eyebrows because it’s a trait cancer cells have. Some cell lines might spontaneously immortalize, and others get a nudge from bioengineering (like tweaking genes to keep them dividing). A few scientists—like those cited in a 2021 MIT study—say we need more long-term data to be 100% sure these engineered cells don’t carry risks, especially if oncogenes (cancer-linked genes) are involved. But that’s a call for caution, not proof of cancer in your lab-grown burger. Even if a cell line had some theoretical cancer-like trait, it’d be cooked and digested—experts say there’s no plausible way it could cause cancer in humans.

On the flip side, skeptics argue the industry’s opacity fuels doubt. Companies don’t always spill the beans on their exact methods, and terms like “immortalized” can sound spooky to the layperson. Posts on X and articles from outlets like The People’s Voice have hyped up the cancer angle, but they lean on speculation or misread sources—like twisting that Bloomberg article into something it didn’t say. The Bloomberg piece actually quotes cancer researchers saying there’s no risk of cancer from eating these cells, even if they were cancerous, because they’re not human cells and digestion breaks them down.

So, evidence of cancer cells in lab-grown meat? None that holds up. It’s mostly stem cells doing their thing, not tumors. That said, the lack of decades-long studies means some folks will keep questioning it—and they’re not wrong to want transparency. For now, regulators and scientists say it’s safe, but the debate’s not dead yet.

🧵🧵BREAKING: Trump signs new Executive Order defining DOGE & fighting back against lawfare and judicial overreach!

The new EO focuses on defining DOGE more concisely but underlying that appears to be a clear message to the courts - DOGE is legal and here is how it works. @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk @DOGE @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox A number of the lawsuits challenging DOGE initiatives lob unsupported allegations about what DOGE might do based on what seems to be simple rhetoric on X or elsewhere. The purpose of this EO is really to better define and provide clarity regarding DOGE’s role and authority. This should provide ammo for the attorneys defending against the lawsuits the swamp is filing.

LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE: President Trump is doing a lot with executive orders and the left is suing him over and over again. These clowns are literally saying that the Take Care Clause of the Constitution demands Trump allow fraud and waste to occur. I’d argue that the Take Care Clause and the President’s enforcement discretion give him latitude to manage when laws conflict.

So how do executive orders work with regards to spending and what is the Take Care Clause all about? Thread below. @VigilantFox @gatewaypundit @GenFlynn The President's authority to allocate or redirect spending through executive orders is limited and must be grounded either in statutory authority or the Constitution. In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the President could not seize and operate steel mills during a labor strike without statutory authorization. This meant that actions like this were exclusively within the purview of Congress, not the executive branch. In other words, the President cannot unilaterally redirect spending or take control of private property without explicit legislative backing.

Judicial Overreach Against DOGE & Costco's Vaccinated "Organic" Meat x.com/i/broadcasts/1… Costco Post:

https://x.com/RenzTom/status/1888696802976972934

LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE on the court issuing a TRO blocking Trump’s DOGE employees access to Treasury Data

@realDonaldTrump brought @elonmusk in under the reorganized USDS - now the US DOGE Service. As I chronicled elsewhere this was quite clearly legal and that action has not been challenged. What is being challenged is DOGE employees having access to Treasury Department Data Systems.

Yesterday, a comprehensive complaint was filed before an Obama appointed judge in NY. The 60 page - fairly complex - complaint and request for TRO was filed yesterday and somehow U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer was able to fully vet this complaint and grant the TRO the same night. While granting a same day TRO does happen, it is quite impressive that he was able to research and rule on such a complex complaint in such a short period of time.

Let’s talk about that TRO. @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox When a complaint is filed in a court the complaint makes certain allegations, alleges facts to support those allegations, and then requests relief. In the case of this complaint the request for relief included a request for a TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) against the subject of the complaint. In other words they asked that Trump and DOGE be blocked from auditing treasury department data.

🧵🧵 USAID - Lawyer’s Perspective on @elonmusk & @realDonaldTrump Taking On Govt Waste

After digging into the real truth about DOGE (see the link to my other thread below) I decided that I should absolutely dig into the truth about the “shut down” of USAID. Just like the lies about DOGE - neither Trump nor Musk has not actually shut down USAID and they are currently just exposing the waste they have found. While I really cannot see a way to save something so corrupt, they have not actually even formalized their long-term plans for USAID yet.

Everything you are hearing from the left and the press is simply propaganda from people mad that their grift has been exposed and shut down. @GenFlynn @VigilantFox As you can see in the announcement above, USAID has put everyone except “designated personnel responsible for mission critical functions, core leadership and specially designated programs” on administrative leave. This means the agency still exists and is still carrying out mission critical functions. So why all the screaming and crying from the Democrats and the left? Because Trump and DOGE do not believe that funding corrupt programs used to pad the pockets of corrupt political figures or other programs that do nothing to benefit America are actually mission critical. This means that those programs will likely not be continuing after the pause. Below are a few examples of such programs.

🧵🧵DOGE - A Lawyer’s Perspective on the @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Policy Centerpiece

I inherently do not trust the media so I decided to look into DOGE myself and see what is under the hood. Initially I was quite concerned about the legality of a “new agency” created by executive order but that - just like everything else - is a lie put out by the mainstream. The order is here and the thread is below:

@VigilantFox

To understand anything the government does it’s usually best to start with the law or something else I might be able to sue over… in this case the executive order itself was the thing to see.

CORRUPTION?: The left claims that Fanni Willis had no conflicts in bringing the case against Donald Trump? Did you know that Kamala Harris and Fani Willis are connected?

Kamala Harris is part of a Fraternity/Sorority network - known as the Divine 9 - that continues to work together to promote leftists causes at any cost. This is the same network that Lindsey Davis - the infamous host of the Presidential debate - is part of.

The Weaver Investigation has found evidence that this network was involved in the 2020 election steal and the case Fani Willis brought against Trump.

Was there any legitimacy to this case? Or was the case against Trump simply another leftist smear against the President? The question is becoming more legitimate every day.

You see the evidence and hear their words here. You decide. Praying people vote #MAGA #Trump #Trump2024 @realDonaldTrump Let's take a deeper look at Ray McClendon.
NAACP - Political Action Chairman


Architect of the "Georgia Miracle".
Member of KAPPA ALPHA PSI - of the Divine 9 linkedin.com/in/raymondmccl…

BREAKING: The United States Government has recognized that weather modification experiments were “undeniably successful” as far back as the 1960s.

In a memo from the State Department sent in January of 1967 the Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs acknowledged the “undeniable success” of Operation Popeye. Operation Popeye was a military weather modification program used to facilitate extreme rain in Vietnam.

Given this success why aren’t we using the same tactics to put out or prevent wild fires? How much more effective are we now as compared to the 60s? Could new tech - 60 years later - be used to steer or weaken hurricanes? Could it be used to strengthen them? These seem like fair questions. Maybe @Jim_Jordan will have a hearing on this. @mtgreenee is being ridiculed for discussing this but this is from a dot gov website (link in the comments). @glennbeck @RealWayneRoot @realJoeHoft @RealAlexJones

Per the Memo: 3. During the test phase, more than 50 cloud seeding experiments were conducted. The results are viewed by DOD as outstandingly successful.
(a)
82% of the clouds seeded produced rain within a brief period after seeding—a percentage appreciably higher than normal expectation in the absence of seeding.
(b)
The amount of rainfall induced by seeding is believed to have been sufficient to have contributed substantially to rendering vehicular routes in this area inoperable. Since the end of the rainy season, the communists have failed to undertake route repairs and there has been no vehicular traffic.
(c)
In one instance, the rainfall continued as the cloud moved eastward across the Vietnam border and inundated a U.S. Special Forces camp with nine inches of rain in four hours.
(d)
DOD scientists consider that the experiment demonstrated a capacity to raise and maintain rainfall under controlled conditions to the level at which the land is saturated over a sustained period, slowing movement on foot and rendering the operation of vehicles impracticable.

4. In our view, the experiments were undeniably successful, indicating that, at least under weather and terrain conditions such as those involved, the U.S. Government has realized a capability of significant weather modification. If anything, the tests were “too successful”—neither the volume of induced rainfall nor the extent of area affected can be precisely predicted. The only absolute control, therefore, is after the fact, i.e., to halt cloud-seeding missions.

Link: history.state.gov/historicaldocu…

THREAD: Is weather modification part of the October surprise?

FEMA is obviously a disaster because of the Harris/Biden executive orders but what if there’s something more going on? I’ve not said a ton about chem trails or weather modification because I can’t prove enough of what’s being done. That said both are real and both are government programs that appear related.

Weather modification programs in the United States started immediately after World War II and reached their public peak in the 70s. At that time we passed the national Weather Modification Policy Act. More in the thread. The weather mod policy act can be found here: congress.gov/94/statute/STA…

BREAKING: Japan to release new saRNA Vaccine designed to spread to others WITHOUT INFORMED or ANY OTHER CONSENT.

This new version of the vaccine bioweapons can and will spread to others. The saRNA does not have “break” and will potentially continue to exist in your system or the system of the people it is spread to forever. This is an absolute violation of numerous laws in many countries and of many principles of international law.

I have personally been reporting on this since 2021 on this is something the global anti-health pro-vax crew has been working on for years. This has the potential to be the REAL next global plandemic as side effects will be incredibly common and untraceable to the vaccines. Disease X - here we come. @RealAlexJones @MarioNawfal @GuntherEagleman @GenFlynn @VigilantFox @VigilantNews


Resplendent cedar Osprey (big pharma paid back) said the below for a proposed community note. Classic big pharma lying technique - i didn’t say anything about a virus spreading. This spreads the saRNA poison that makes your body create the spike protein poison. You get infected with the vax that creates the poison not the virus but it’s all WITHOUT informed consent. Keep trying big pharma sellouts.