BREAKING. Huge lawsuit! Thread.

Three swimmers from Penn are suing the Ivy League and the NCAA for allowing a male (William “Lia” Thomas) to be in their changing room while they were completely nude and then allowing him to compete against them! 1/ Image
2. They seek damages for “pain and suffering, mental and emotional distress, suffering and anxiety, expenses costs and other damages.”

In case you didn’t know, these schools really allowed that man into their changing room and provided the ladies with no other place to change. Image
3. Female racing swimsuits are extremely tight and it’s very hard to wriggle into them. It takes a long time. They told these women to change in front of this man.
4. Thomas, who swam for Penn and graduated in 2022, won the Ivy League championship his senior year in the 500 freestyle, 100 freestyle, and 200 freestyle individually, as well as the 400 freestyle relay.

No kidding.
5. Harvard Athletics’ T-gender Inclusion Policy states that “Harvard Athletics actively seeks to create a space that is welcoming and inclusive to all identities; including but not limited to gender, gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation.”

What hogwash! Image
6. I hope these women get every single penny in endowment money these universities have.

Not only was he in the changing room when they were nude but he exposed himself to them!

I love how they have demanded a jury trial! May the jury be filled with people with common sense.
7. Riley Gaines and others who were in the room have noted that Mr. Thomas retained his franks and beans as do the overwhelming majority of these men. Many members of the public are unaware of this. Which may contribute to why some were ok with this. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖

Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @babybeginner

Apr 14
JK Rowling thread.

You’ve heard how people say terrible things about JK Rowling and what an awful person she is? It stems from the fact that she calls a man a man. That’s it. That is the crime of the century.

Seriously. They demand she pretend men are women and she won’t. 1/Image
I can’t stress enough. That’s what all the hullabaloo is over. They say that she is denying a man’s humanity by calling him a man. That’s IT.

This is upside down and inside out.

She couldn’t be humanizing him more by recognizing his actual humanity. 2/ Image
Don’t be fooled by any of this. Of course there is nothing wrong with recognizing an adult male human being as an adult male human being. Of course it’s not denying his humanity. It’s silly to say otherwise. So why do they do it? Why say such a ridiculous thing? 3/
Read 8 tweets
Apr 11
THREAD

The man on the right and two others are suing England Hockey bc they dared to say women’s hockey is for females. They created an open category for him. But that isn’t his cup of tea.

He also says 1/ Image
Yes, he does use the changing room with all the women. Since no one has said anything to him he assumes that means that all the women are fine with it. 2/ Image
He will punish England Hockey
for daring to have a female only category. The punishment is the legal process. He is trying to raise £100,000 for the legal costs. How can clubs survive vexatious lawsuits like these? 3/
Read 5 tweets
Apr 9
THREAD

OMG

I’m speechless here. Not only did John Oliver belittle Payton McNabb for getting hurt by a male volleyball player but here he calls her vile names for calling out a man in the ladies room!

What???????

1/

He has the audacity to say the man crossing women’s boundaries isn’t doing anything?!!!!

When did it become to perfectly ok to violate women’s privacy?

It’s like we are in anti Me Too world. 2/
He focuses the whole world on this young lady and calls her nasty. That’s low.

What is going on??????

Of all people to go after!! He goes after the girl who was seriously injured bc they let a boy play against her!!!

She is still dealing with the effects of that hit.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 9
THREAD.

You know Payton McNabb. She is the young lady who was bashed so hard with a volleyball hit by a male player that she got seriously hurt.

Here is John Oliver going after her. She’s a young girl and John Oliver is attacking her! 1/


Image
Seriously, can we all stop and appreciate the situation here. John Oliver is minimizing what happened to her. He can’t address the issue that having men in women’s sports is dangerous, so he belittles a young girl, a teenager at the time, who was seriously injured by a boy. 2/
She did nothing but GET HURT and has to shame her on his show.

This is so low, folks. So down and dirty. He is putting her in danger to push an ideology that is indefensible on its own terms. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Apr 6
THREAD.

For some reason the left’s hill seems to be getting men into women’s sports. And denying it’s happening.

I have no idea why they want to do the former, but they want to do the latter bc it’s so unpopular. Or shall I say enraging?

Enter John Oliver. 1/ Image
The UN has put out a statement saying there are hundreds of men in women’s sports. If you’ve been paying the slightest bit of attention, you know. You see it every week. Another guy somewhere has taken a place from women in sports. Just this week we saw three. 2/ Image
Image
Image
So what is a political group to do that is pushing something that NO ONE wants? They have to deny it. And hard!

They try to say it’s not happening by forcing sports groups into NOT keeping records. If no one keeps track, it isn’t happening, right? 3/
Read 10 tweets
Apr 4
BREAKING. THREAD.

A very activist Montana judge has temporarily blocked a bill (HB 121) that was signed into law protecting women’s privacy in bathrooms.

The reasoning is spectacular. Just wait for this:

1/ Image
The judge found there is no evidence that it protects women’s privacy to keep men out of women’s bathrooms!

Um….excuse me. What does this judge think women want privacy from? 2/ Image
This is a bit technical legally but the court finds that TG status is a suspect class which gets special protection. Why? Bc equal treatment on the basis of s*x is a fundamental right.

But genderism isn’t ON the basis of s*x at all!!!!! Talk about mixing up concepts. 3/ Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(