There’s a new battle brewing—Volkswagen vs. India’s revenue department—and it's turning messy. In September 2024, Indian tax authorities issued Volkswagen a staggering $1.4 billion tax notice, accusing the automaker of underpaying import taxes for years. 🧵👇
As a strategy, Volkswagen imports car parts, assembles them in India, and sells the finished vehicles. Indian authorities, however, claim Volkswagen found a way to avoid paying the higher import tax rate on these imported car parts. Volkswagen insists it has merely been following the rules.
The Indian authorities say that if a car company imports most of a vehicle in CKD (Completely Knocked Down) form, it faces a steep 30-35% import duty. However, if companies import individual car parts separately and manufacture the car in India, they qualify for a lower 5-15% tax rate.
The government alleges that Volkswagen deliberately splits up shipments to bypass the higher tax bracket. Up to 1,500 parts per car were ordered in different batches to avoid this higher tax. Essentially, India is accusing Volkswagen of exploiting a loophole in tax rules.
Volkswagen defends itself against the tax allegations by insisting it has never imported full car kits to avoid taxes. Instead, the company argues, it separates car part shipments for logistical reasons. They liken it to ordering parts of a chair individually, not as a disassembled unit, which attracts a higher tax rate.
In 2011, Volkswagen claimed it had informed the Indian government about its “part-by-part” import strategy. The authorities provided clarifications that this approach was compliant with tax rules. Now, they've reversed their stance, accusing Volkswagen of using this setup to dodge taxes.
Volkswagen argues a sudden policy reversal can erode trust in India’s business environment. The company described the tax demand as damaging to the reputation of India’s "ease of doing business” initiative, cautioning it may make global companies reconsider their investments.
Volkswagen operates in India under Skoda Auto Volkswagen India, managing brands like Volkswagen, Skoda, Audi, Porsche, and Lamborghini. As part of its “India 2.0” project, Volkswagen has committed €1 billion to designing cars specifically for Indian buyers—models like the Volkswagen Taigun and Skoda Kushaq are products of this initiative.
Despite merging its operations under Skoda Auto Volkswagen India to fortify its presence in the highly competitive Indian market, VW holds only about 2% market share. With reported sales of $2.19 billion in 2023-24, yet profits of just $11 million, this hefty tax notice could potentially derail Volkswagen's plans in India.
Volkswagen's current tax dispute echoes the infamous 2007 Vodafone tax case in India. Despite the transaction happening overseas, Vodafone was slapped with a $2 billion capital gains tax after acquiring a controlling stake in an Indian telecom firm. The telecom giant fought back, winning the case in India's Supreme Court in 2012.
Despite Vodafone's victory in India's Supreme Court, the government retroactively changed tax laws, making Vodafone liable. This action provoked global investor backlash and tarnished India's business reputation. It took an international tribunal ruling and nearly a decade for India to repeal the retrospective tax law in 2021. However, the damage to Vodafone's financial status was already done.
Volkswagen isn't alone in its struggles in India. Other automakers have had their fair share of challenges too. Nissan found itself in a $770 million tax dispute with the Tamil Nadu government in 2018. In 2021, Ford, after years of regulatory hurdles and losses, ceased operations. Tesla, too, has repeatedly delayed its entry into India due to high import taxes on electric vehicles.
These cases paint a clear picture: while India promotes investment with slogans like “Make in India” and “Ease of Doing Business,” foreign companies often find themselves blindsided by shifting policies and tax disputes.
The tax issue threatens Volkswagen's operations beyond the financial aspects. After the tax notice, Mumbai customs temporarily blocked over 50 shipments of spare parts for Volkswagen's luxury brands, causing disruptions in supply chains and delays at dealerships. Although these shipments were eventually released, the harm to Volkswagen's supply chain has been done.
Volkswagen is taking its massive tax dispute to the Bombay High Court, with a hearing scheduled for February 5th. The automaker aims to overturn the tax notice, in hopes of salvaging its long-term plans in India.
This case extends beyond Volkswagen; it could impact foreign investments in India. If India doesn't provide a stable and predictable regulatory environment, it may deter other foreign companies from making significant investments in the country.
India's goal of becoming a global manufacturing hub is heavily influenced by its handling of disputes like Volkswagen's tax issue. Will history repeat itself with another Vodafone-like debacle, or will the government make efforts to reassure investor confidence? The outcome holds significance for India's future investment landscape.
You can watch the episode on YouTube, read on Substack, or listen on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. All links here: thedailybrief.zerodha.com/p/indias-fmcg-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Q3 FY25 results for Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) are out, providing a snapshot of the industry. HFCs generate revenue by borrowing at a cost and lending at slightly higher rates, but margins remain tight. Unlike credit cards with sky-high interest rates, home loans stay in the single digits (or slightly higher for affordable housing).
We’ll take a quick look at three key players in the sector. But before that, here are two important trends shaping the industry: first, housing construction is slowing down, and second, raising funds has become more challenging. 🧵👇
So, what really matters when analyzing HFCs?
- Loan Growth Rates – Are they lending more than last year, and is the pace of growth slowing? Since charging high interest rates isn’t an option, growth depends on volume.
- NPAs (Non-Performing Assets) – How many loans are turning bad? This number moves slowly because housing loans are long-term, and defaulting on them is often frowned upon in society.
- Net Interest Margins (NIMs) – The difference between borrowing and lending rates. Margins are already tight, and this quarter, they’re getting even tighter.
The Housing Boom Is Losing Steam
Housing finance had experienced a strong growth streak after the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this was unsustainable, and it is now reverting to normal.
According to Knight Frank, sales and new launches in the affordable housing segment—once a major growth driver—have dropped in pace. The sector’s growth peaked in 2022 but has been slowing ever since.
The consultation paper on algorithmic (algo) trading, which SEBI released in December, laid the groundwork for changes aimed at safeguarding retail investors while enhancing accessibility to algo trading. Now, with the release of SEBI's final framework, most aspects remain similar to those outlined in the original consultation paper. Here’s a closer look at what has been finalized. 🧵👇
Before that, let’s quickly explain what algo trading is. Algo trading uses computer programs to automatically buy and sell stocks based on predefined rules. SEBI's goal is to strike a balance between allowing retail participation in algo trading and ensuring market integrity. Algo trading, which currently accounts for about 70% of market volume (mostly driven by institutional players), is becoming more accessible to retail investors, thanks to broker-provided APIs and algorithm platforms.
Image: NSE Market Pulse
However, this access brought risks, with unregulated algo platforms often advertising strategies with false promises of guaranteed returns.
SEBI wanted to prevent chaos. So, the core ideas from December’s consultation paper remain intact.
Throughout Donald Trump’s electoral campaign, one economic promise stood out over all others — tariffs. Two weeks into his presidency, he's already delivering on that promise.
Why does he want tariffs? His reasons aren’t obvious, but there are two possibilities: one, that he wants leverage, and two, he wants to correct past wrongs. 🧵👇
The first is straightforward. The American market, with its seemingly endless appetite for consumption, is a global cash cow for export-oriented economies. This, to Trump, is an enormous point of leverage. By threatening to cut off access to this market through tariffs, Trump believes he can force countries to bend to his will on all sorts of issues — ranging from trade balances to immigration and drug enforcement.
Beyond this, however, Trump perhaps believes that America’s trade deficits come from historical injustices. Many countries export more goods and services to America than it exports to them. There are many reasons behind this, of course — from simple economic laws to the Dollar’s status as the world’s reserve currency. In Trump’s worldview, however, other countries duped America while it quietly stood by, and he’s out to reverse this imbalance.
Either way, Trump came in with a track record for tariffs — after all, in his first term, he famously launched a trade war against China. Even so, given how deeply the United States economy was linked to the rest of the world, people weren’t quite sure of how far he could go.
Private life insurers have released their results, and we thought we would give you a glimpse of what is unfolding. Insurance is a complex sector, and we are far from experts, so we will focus on just a few points that should matter to anyone starting to learn about this space.🧵👇
Let's start by looking at APE (Annual Premium Equivalent), a key metric that gives us a glance at the revenue equivalent for insurance companies. It paints a clear picture of the premiums collected, informing us about vital industry-level growth rates.
Overall, the industry declined by 2.3% for the quarter, while it grew by 13.8% year over year. This suggests that something happened in the most recent quarter that caused a hiccup in the long-term growth story. Going more granular, LIC dragged the industry down by declining 27.3%.
Each year, the day before the Finance Minister's budget speech, the Finance Ministry unveils an 'Economic Survey'. This annual commentary, prepared by India's Chief Economic Advisor (or CEA), is pivotal in understanding India's economy. It offers insight into the government's economic thoughts and forecasts for India's future. 🧵👇
The Economic Survey is crucial for understanding three things:
(a) a comprehensive look at how different parts of the economy are doing.
(b) India’s biggest economic challenges.
(c) The CEA’s suggestions on steps India could take to “boost” its economy.
This year’s Economic Survey occurs only six months after the last one. The context of the two surveys, however, could hardly be more different. Over the last year, the outside world has become increasingly uncertain — a bad environment for India’s growth.
As Budget 2025-26 approaches, we find ourselves in interesting times. As the global economy grapples with slow growth and China's economic dynamism wavers, India manages to keep its head above water, eyeing a 6.8% GDP growth in FY25, and outpacing other major economies.🧵👇
However, concerns loom beneath. Declining foreign investment and slowing consumption, particularly in urban India, amidst weak global trade relations prove worrisome. With limited growth engines, navigating through this critical juncture to maintain our economic trajectory is Budget 2025-26's biggest challenge.
Will This Budget bring a crucial simplification to our income tax laws? With hints at a new 'direct tax code' and efforts towards a more streamlined tax regime, the Finance Minister seems geared towards making income tax payments less complicated for citizens.