It’s been an exhausting 3 weeks listening to President Trump’s executive orders.
Are there any patterns?
Trump’s thought processes: he is 💯 a New York property developer. You see it in how he throws ideas out to see if they stick (or to watch how people respond them them), so as to guide his next steps.
Trump’s communication style (or his administration’s comms style): we have entered an era of what you might call news management 2.0.
News Management 1.0 was the 1990s style government communication grid with structured, coordinated daily announcements with people holding to a ‘line’
News Management 2.0 is different and reflective of the internet and social media age: the Trump White House issues a blizzard of announcements on diverse topics with the intention that they bury each other and the media (and the public) don’t know what to follow/what is important.
In a sense it’s the opposite of News Management 1.0 which was about structuring a media landscape and giving it a narrative arc.
News Management 2.0 is about obscuring the narrative through hyperactive disjointed announcements. Our brains spend all their time trying to pick out a pattern.
Trump Internationally: it’s clear that Trump is now actively trying to tear down the international order from leaving (or threatening to leave) the WTO and the WHO; sanctioning International Criminal Court people; to pulling out of the Paris climate accords.
Trump sits alongside Russia (and to a lesser degree China) in seeking to destroy the international network of organisations that help us regulate and negotiate between countries.
The US has become unilateral coercive bully just like Russia and China.
The middle ranking powers - of which the UK is a prime example - rely extensively on the international order with its relatively predictable environment of rules and laws.
They need to start thinking very fast about how these middle powers can come together to make the international order work - at the moment the three big are dividing and ruling the middle power - they need to come together to reinforce the international order and try and hold the big powers to account (easy in the case of Russia, less so with the other two).
In the mean time - the unpredictable international environment continues and it’s only a matter of time before some leader makes a mistake or some crisis (migration from the Sahel anyone?) tips us over into war.
And if you want to stay safe in that environment, or avoid being coerced, you need to increase your defence capabilities.
This is 2025.
We are coming to the end of the post World War Two consensus internationally, and we don’t yet know what the new consensus looks like.
It’s gonna be a rough ride.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How did the collapse of British military power lead to the latest Donald Trump outburst on Greenland?
A 🧵 (with some 🖍️)
Trump said yesterday that he wouldn’t rule out military force to bring Greenland under US control. Greenland is the largest island in the world and in a critical strategic position - of which more later
Of course - Greenland isn’t as big as this map suggests - which looks like it does as the map projection enlarges territory closer to the poles. But it is still pretty big, and pretty important.
Today we call on the Government to investigate with our allies how to seize $300bn of frozen Russian state assets to fund Ukraine’s victory
There is an unanswerable moral, strategic and legal case for the use of Russian state assets to support Ukraine in its war effort. It’s never been more urgent than in a world where the incoming US administration might be pulling the plug on support for Ukraine.
Today this issue will be debated in the House of Commons where we will call on the government to act, and act now.
The last week has seem some momentous changes in Syria.
Here are some first thoughts.
A 🧵
Firstly, we should see the fall of the House of Assad as a function of a weak and rotten Syrian government, and stretched and weakened allies of Iran and Russia - more than HTS or any other rebel movement becoming vastly more competent.
The Assad government has grown progressively weaker - this generally happens when corruption is utterly rampant - I mean who wants to die when your officers are skimming your pay and selling your ammunition?
Let’s take a look at the economic side of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
A 🧵
Once wars go beyond a couple of months, they tend to become a battle of the economies—that is, who is will to turn a bigger part of their economy into a machine that produces arms and munitions.
Obviously, if you have two sides that are both willing to turn as much as possible of their economies over to the war, then the side with the bigger economy will tend to win (all other things being equal).
The US has decided to allow Ukraine to use longer-range missiles in Russia.
This brings to a close a pretty feckless period of US policy towards Ukraine.
A 🧵
It’s quite hard to even work out what the White House is trying to do these days, apart from vainly responding to events.
Let’s dig into it.
This permissions - that Ukraine be allowed to use the longer range US supplied ATACAMS missiles (range 300km) inside Russia - is all of a piece with a series of decisions stretching right back to 2014.