The Gripen E is least capable fighter produced in Europe. Both Rafale and Eurofighter are much more capable and those two are still less capable than the F-35A.
Even the F-15EX is more capable than the Gripen E. No Air Force with access to either F-35A, Rafale or Eurofighter 1/9
will buy the Gripen E. It's just not happening.
The Gripen E carries the least amount of weapons over the shortest distance.
And stop with "Gripen E is improved for arctic conditions": where do you think Eielson Air Force Base is? 2/n
Besides, at 10,000m / 33,000ft the temperature is -50°C / -58°F. Much colder than "arctic conditions".
And the "Gripen E can take off from roads" / "only needs a short runway" arguments - roads: so can the F-35A, so can the Eurofighter, etc. 3/n
And if a very short runway is your main concern... nothing can compete with the shortness of F-35B runways.
Sure you sacrifice fuel and weapons load if you operate F-35B instead of F-35A, but even the F-35B carries more fuel and weapons than a Gripen E, because the 4/n
advertised Gripen E weapons load requires to cut back two thirds on the internal fuel, and the advertised Gripen E combat range requires external fuel tanks.
The Gripen E is a good fighter; surely better than anything the russians have, but it is a lightweight fighter, which 5/n
just can't compete with the West's best fighters: F-35A, Eurofighter, Rafale, F-15EX.
It's main competitor is actually the F-16... but the newest F-16 version, the F-16V Block 70/72 is also a better fighter than the Gripen E. 6/n
Of all the mentioned fighters, the F-35A is the cheapest. Big production run equals lower cost.
And unlike the Gripen E (the third generation of the Gripen after Gripen A/B and Gripen C/D) the F-35 will evolve: new variants and weapons will be added over the next 40+ years. 7/n
The F-35 also has by far the best radar and avionics, and that is the reason 🇦🇺🇧🇪🇨🇦🇨🇿🇩🇰🇫🇮🇩🇪🇬🇷🇮🇱🇮🇹🇯🇵🇳🇱🇳🇴🇵🇱🇷🇴🇸🇬🇰🇷🇨🇭🇬🇧 have chosen the F-35.
Only 🇧🇷 has chosen the Gripen E, which in the defence black hole South America are, and will be for decades, the most advanced fighters. 8/n
So for Brazil the Gripen E makes sense, also for i.e. Ireland, as they just need to patrol their airspace.
But for everyone else in Europe, the F-35A is a better choice, followed by the Eurofighter or the Rafale. If you can't get these three, buy F-16 Block 70 as 🇧🇬🇸🇰 did. 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Of course Gripen has a fast turnaround time - due to having the fewest hardpoints of all Western fighters and the smallest fuel tank of all Western fighters.
The Gripen also has the shortest combat range at full weapons load. If you want 1/9
to extend the range, either you can't use the full weapons load or you have to mount external fuel tanks, which of course use weapon hardpoints.
The Gripen E also has less thrust than all other Western fighters and it doesn't "supercruise". That's a load of bollocks.
2/n
In 2009 Saab's Gripen NG demonstrator (without weapons or weapon pylons) climbed to 28,000 ft, then used the afterburner to accelerate to Mach 1.2, then cut the afterburner and THEN the plane continued at Mach 1.2 for a bit. That is not "supercruise".
3/n
The ocean that both, the US and Europe, need to be free of hostile submarines. Chinese and russian submarines can only enter it by six routes. Three of which are impassable for them.
But the easiest & shortest open route is past Greenland.
1/25
During WWI German submarines sank 6,000+ allied ships and during WWII 3,500+ allied ships.
In both wars the allies had to deploy 100s of destroyers, corvettes, subchasers and aircraft to hunt Germany's U-Boote.
(Photo: a U-Boot is hit by a US Navy plane on 16 July 1943) 2/n
During the Cold War NATO had two military commands:
• Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) for the defence of Europe
• Supreme Allied Commander Atlantic (SACLANT) for the defence of the Atlantic
It consists of 4× nations:
🇨🇦Canada
🇺🇸United States
🇩🇰Denmark (Greenland)
🇫🇷France (Saint Pierre & Miquelon)
and 6× air forces, the smallest of which is Canada's.
The map shows bases with fighter jets (details in the next tweet).
1/22
Bases with fighter jets:
• Blue: US Air Force
• Dark Blue: US Navy
• Yellow: US Air National Guard
• Green: US Air Force Reserve
• Orange: US Marine Corps
• Red: Royal Canadian Air Force
• Grey: NORAD Forward Operating Locations
• Black: former US fighter jet bases
2/22
Please note:
• Canada abandoned the construction of the NORAD forward operating location at Kuujjuaq once the Cold War ended.
• most US bases house active, national guard and reserve squadrons. The map assigns the colors based on the main unit on site.
3/22
A beautiful, green island, inhabited by the North Irish and to their South the worst defence scroungers of the continent.
With just 0.25% of GDP for defence the Republic of Ireland is the lowest defence spender in all of Europe.
Even the Vatican spends
1/41
GDP-wise ten times more on the Swiss Guard.
Ireland is shamelessly scrounging off the UK for its defence.
Even more infuriating: the Irish had a budget surplus of €25 billion in 2024. That's +8% of GDP. And yet they expect the UK to deploy its limited military resources
2/41
to defend Ireland's air and sea for free.
Ireland is the worst of the worst of the worst.
With a GDP of over €500 billion and a budget surplus of €41.1 billion in three years (2022 €8.6 billion; 2023 €7.5 billion; 2024 €25 billion as Apple now finally pays taxes),
3/41
As many people do not realize the importance of 🇬🇱 Greenland for the defence of the 🇺🇸 US, I will explain it:
• 🇨🇳 chinese nuclear submarines
If you watched The Hunt for Red October, you already know the reason the US has been, is, will be worried about enemy submarines.
1/24
Enemy submarines operating off the US East Coast would sink US ships, blockade US ports, launch cruise missiles at US cities, and disrupt US supply and reinforcement transports to Europe.
Today russia's Northern Fleet has 5× cruise missile and 9× attack submarines at
2/24
Murmansk, which in case of war would sail towards the central Atlantic.
But to get there the russian submarines must pass the GIUK gap or Greenland-Iceland-UK gap.
During the Cold War the US Navy and US Air Force operated P-3C Orion Maritime Patrol Aircraft (MPA) and
3/24