🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Holy crapola! This federal judge went so far off the rails, Trump Administration really has no option but to seek mandamus! 1/
2/ Yesterday, Blue States sought to enforce TRO entered by Rhode Island federal court. Gov't responded spending isn't covered by TRO, other is allowed by statute, other is because of computer freezes given amount required.
3/ Judge's Order today prohibits any freeze on ANY federal funding which is much beyond what lawsuit challenged. Here's order I bought on Pacer and uploaded to Courtlisterner. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
4/ Note this footnote, for instance, which I believe has a typo and should say Paragraph 3 because Paragraph 2 isn't on page 2 and also because Paragraph 2 says what they can't do, whereas Paragraph 3 says what they can do.
5/ If, as I assume, that footnote refers to Paragraph 3 of the Government's notice re impact of TRO, the Court is greatly expanding the TRO beyond its already ridiculous scope to interfere in Executive Branch. Also, these provisions are nutso:
6/6 Complaint did not challenge the prexisting OMB directive 25-11 and the Unleashing pause came from that directive. In short, this outrageously broad order may end up being for the best b/c it provides a solid basis for mandamus.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨🚨BREAKING: Plaintiffs (bunch of non-profits getting USAID money) request immediate issuance of TRO or hearing to prohibit basically any limitation of grants. Court ordered hearing for today. 1/
3/ NOTE: This is not a request limited to grants Congress specifically identified and mandated, but across-board injunction that would prevent Executive agencies from deciding how to best spend those grants. I predict Trump Admin. will request at hearing it be converted to PI.*
🧨🚨🚨🚨: YUGE win for Trump in his defamation lawsuit against Pulitzer Committee. Florida Court of Appeals held complaint sufficiently alleged conspiracy so that personal jurisdiction* in Florida was proper b/c one member was Fl. resident who reviewed statement in Fl. 1/
2/ Personal jurisdiction means power to force a person into a court within a state. All but one of Defendants (Pulitzer Board members) sought to dismiss b/c no connection to Florida but appellate court held b/c complaint sufficiently alleged under state law a conspiracy they all
3/ can be sued in Florida. One member of 3-judge appellate panel concurred and detailed why Trump's defamation & conspiracy claims were properly supported.
3/ Judge pretends like there was no need for clarification but that is bologna because Trump Administration explained in its opposition to order to enforce that it was doing precisely these 2 things & court responded by threatening criminal contempt.
🚨🚨💀BREAKING (and hilarious): Trump Administration files supplement asking for more permission from court to review payments "flagged" by system, because the TRO & supplemental order was absolute!! 1/
🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump Administration files Emergency Motion asking Rhode Island federal judge to rule whether it can w/h funding noting Court threatened criminal contempt but Court of Appeals refused to stay TRO b/c it was sure RI Court would rule expeditiously. 1/
3/ So Trump Administration wants Court to say whether or not it can withhold funding to FEMA based on concerns of the funding. (More on declaration shortly.)
3/ In short, Judge split baby in half saying "senate confirmed" Treasury folks could have access to databases but not other political appointees or special DOGE employees. In so ruling, though, Court reveals nonsense of case. Here's reasoning why senate-confirmed folks get access