Insurrection Barbie Profile picture
Feb 10 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🧵🧵Samantha Power, USAID and the funding of Hamas prior to 10/7 and after:

Current and former state department officials who worked closely with USAID have come forward to talk about how this agency has funneled millions and millions of dollars to anti-Israel advocacy groups and entities with known ties to terrorism.

The Washington Free Beacon lays it all out and connects it directly to Samantha Power.

Not only that but USAID actually tried to conceal how taxpayer funds were spent and caused friction within the first Trump administration and even some elements of the Biden administration.
Examples:

1. November 2022 - 100,000 to an activist group whose leaders hail the popular front for the liberation of Palestine, which is a known and designated terror group.

2. 10/1 (6 days before the attack) USAID gave $900,000 to a charity in Gaza involved with Ismail Haniyeh, the son of the leader of Hamas.

3. In January 2024 inspector general Paul Martin issued a report that stated the agency does not maintain a comprehensive internal database of sub awards so that the foreign entities that work with a primary grantee go unreported.

4. In a November report, the inspector general identified deliberate interference and efforts to divert humanitarian assistance by foreign terrorist organizations, including systemic coercion of aid workers by federal terrorist organizations who influenced beneficiary selection.

5. A February report from the Middle East Forum found that USAID awarded millions of federal dollars to organizations directly in Gaza that are controlled by Hamas.

6. In 2019, USAID provided PCFR 90,000 as a sub grant of Catholic relief services.
7. In 2023, Its Together Project received a grant for $2.6 million in 2024 from USAID, and they received $3.7 million in 2023. These people work closely with prominent extremists and organized events with Hamas linked activists and academics to circulate anti-Semitic propaganda about the supposed Jewish control of American universities by Ashkenazi Jews.

Its Together Project published a tool kit that teaches its members how to control negative press by promoting alternative messages and new narratives, and by tying any real criticism of its members to fake news, Internet trolls, and Russian interference in the 2016 election.

They also lobbied the house and Senate to push for the weakening of terror finance laws and met with lawmakers from key committees to lobby against legislation targeting terror financing in South Asia.
8. In January, NGO Monitor outlined the millions of dollars USD was funding for 2 nonprofits: Mercy Corps and American Near East Refugee Aid. These two nonprofits coordinated with a Gaza base ministry run by senior Hamas officials.
In 2021, the Biden State Department issued an internal warning that there was a high risk, Hamas would steal US aid if the shipments had been reinstated. However, when members of Congress pressed USAID about those grants, they refused to answer questions, and obstructed Justice.

@SenJoniErnst addressed some of her concerns when she wrote a letter to Marco Rubio about how USAID willfully and falsely claimed grants were classified to limit congressional oversight of this public information.

Samantha Power herself often lobbied from within the administration to stop pro-Israel policy making at the state department and urged colleagues to pair down statements that praised the Jewish state.

In 2021, when there was a period of conflict with Hamas, and Power refused to meet with Israel’s ambassador, unless Israel reached a cease-fire with the Iran backed to terror group. This decision actually put her at odds with Biden‘s White House national Security Council.

After the 10/7 attack, Power accused Israel of deliberately blocking aid deliveries, even though internal emails obtained by WFB eshow that internal state department documents warned the administration that Hamas was raiding aid packages.

Despite all that, staffers who worked at USAID publicly asked Biden to end military aid to Israel.

We pretty much funded the 10/7 attack on Israel and even Biden’s own state department couldn’t reign in this disastrous agency. And that should scare everybody.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Insurrection Barbie

Insurrection Barbie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DefiyantlyFree

Feb 7
🧵The USAID overhaul was a trial run for how Trump plans to dismantle the deep state. The strategy can be broken down as follows:

1. Impoundment Control Act
2. Democratic Accountability
3. Presidential authority in restructuring the executive branch.

The administrative branch is an unelected bureaucratic state that is immune from accountability to the voters. There has been this false assumption that these agencies are independent from the executive branch, which houses it.

A president should be able to restructure executive agencies and fire employees within those agencies. With the overturning of Chevron Deference, now is the time to test the limits of that executive power.

The lawsuits triggered from the restructuring and condensing of USAID pave the way for the Supreme Court to finally rule on some of these issues.

If President Trump wins on the issues above, the administrative state will suffer a fatal blow.
Impoundment Control Act

As has been argued by @MarkPaoletta Article II of the constitution gives the president the authority to decline to spend money that has already been appropriated by Congress.

The argument is pretty simple, when the president acts under the express powers granted to him in the Constitution, he may take measures that are incompatible with the expressed or implied will of Congress.

The impoundment power can be compared to the discretion a president has in foreign negotiations, and faithful execution of the laws.

Lastly, the impoundment authority also comes from the President’s duty to take care of the laws so that they are faithfully executed.

All of these powers enumerated to the President under Article II allow for discretion. Therefore, the president should have the power to impound funds that have been allocated by Congress if he doesn’t believe they are necessary.
Examples:

1. Harry Truman declined to spend funds on 10 Air Force groups because he said that the need to maintain a balance between national security and a sound economy was vested in him as the Commander-In-Chief.

2. JFK impounded $180 million appropriated for strategic bombers claiming the extra money was unnecessary because of the recent advancements in missile technology.

USAID falls within the purview of foreign policy decisions and will therefore be subject to the discretion of the president.

The overhaul of USAID has set up the perfect fight to tackle the unconstitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act and see if it makes it all the way up to the Supreme Court.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 7
🧵 President Trump creates a new Faith Office to protect religious liberty

- Led by reverend Paula White-Cain
- there will be a task force to end the anti-Christian weaponization of our government
- the task course will have an office in the West Wing and it will report directly to the president

President Trump clearly saw a a lot of anti-Christian bias and antisemitism under Joe Biden.

And before the left starts panicking about this because they don’t like religious liberty, this thread will detail some of the recent attacks by the Biden administration on Christians and some of the attacks on Jewish people in campuses that receive federal funding.

It is very clear that religious liberty was destroyed under the previous administration and President Trump is doing everything he can to restore it.
The Faith Office will work with the domestic policy center and will focus on the following issues:

1. Poverty alleviation.

2. Religious liberty.

3. Strengthening marriage and family.

4. Advancing education.

5. Addressing substance abuse, and addiction.

6. Crime prevention and reduction.

7. Supporting prisoner reentry.

8. Expanding health and humanitarian services.

President Trump would like people of faith to have a seat at the table and how policies are formulated.
This faith office and accompanying executive orders will complement the creation of a task force aimed at eradicating anti Christian bias And the task force aimed at combating antisemitism.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 2
🧵How the Biden administration weaponized USAID:

1.Abortion

One of the first things that Joe Biden did after assuming office was to revoke the Mexico City policy, which was supposed to prevent the federal government from using our tax dollars to fund overseas abortions.

He did this, even though 73% of Americans strongly oppose using taxpayer funding to support overseas abortion. That includes 59% of people that are actually pro-choice.

He resumed funding to the United Nations population fund and dramatically expanded the scope of programs that are authorized to pay for abortion services.

Joe Biden tied taxpayer funded abortion services internationally to the United States efforts to advance, gender quality globally and respond to gender based violence and to confront challenges such as HIV aids, tuberculosis and malaria. That means that grants given through ID that go towards malaria or other diseases include paying for abortions on demand in those countries.

As a result of these abortion driven objectives in 2022 the US Department of state and USA ID budget was 12% higher than previous years and totaled 70 Billion dollars.
2.Identity Ideology

In 2021 the national gender strategy was implemented for foreign aid and started using an intersectional approach that considers barriers and challenges faced by those who have intersecting in compounding forms of discrimination. That’s a fancy way of saying Marxist victimhood in order of priority. In the Biden administration intersectionality dictated the manner in which US AI ID designed its programs and designed who received its funding.
DEI

Representatives of the UN who discussed for an aid frequently mentioned the 1619 project and said that slavery is an original sin of America. The Biden administration made accepting and requiring communities of color to adopt to DEI a condition of receiving foreign aide.3.Global
Read 7 tweets
Jan 10
🧵The Capital Research Center did an extensive study about who was involved in those anti-Israel college protests. The ones they kept trying to tell you are just organic expressions a free speech. The report they put together is 150 pages and details a very well organized and well funded pro terrorism movement that has ties to terrorism and terrorist organizations.

I put the link for the 150 page report at the end of the thread.
First, let’s define what pro-terrorism means: the FBI definition, which is the same definition that was used for this research is any group that endorses, contributes to or has substantive links to individuals or groups that commit violent and criminal acts to further ideological goals or are associated with or inspired by designated foreign terrorist organizations. This definition includes governments that sponsor terrorism, such as Iran.

Specifically excluded from this definition is a group’s opposition to Israeli or US policy. Extremist beliefs, such as favoring the destruction of Israel, or promoting antisemitism were also not considered.

Although every single one of the groups included in the list clearly has that as the only thing that unifies them. They hate and want to destroy Israel and they hate and wanna destroy America.
The driving catalyst behind these anti-Israel protests is a group called Students for Justice in Palestine. The organization that created them is called American Muslims for Palestine.

The planning and execution for these protests started the day after the 10/7 attacks.

SJP celebrated the attacks and called for a national day of resistance on 10/12. They actually passed out a tool kit, which literally said that 10/7 was a historic wind for Palestinian resistance.

That is when the calls for mass mobilization began, and in their tool kit, they say that they are Palestine student students in exile, and they are part of the movement, not just in solidarity with the movement. So people understand the movement is Hamas.

Their literature specifically sides with Syria and the Yemen based Houthis and Iran and Russia. They explicitly say they are proud to be part of the axis resistance to the United States of America.Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 2
I read a fascinating article about the top ten woke leaders in the military who are causing irreparable damage and should be relieved from their duty when Donald Trump resumed office.

1. Loyd Austin: The number one reason he needs to be removed is because of the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan that led to the deaths of 13 US service members.

2. General Charles Brown Jr., Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staffs: The only thing this general has been focused on is diversity hiring. He has spent no effort or energy on warfighting. He has turned race and identity based hiring practices into the dominant way there is recruitment into the military. He is known for saying that you can’t actually bring in diversity by happenstance, you must actively recruit it.

- in 2021 he told PBS that the military needs to break up “the white boys club.”

- In 2022, he sent out a memo to the Air Force, where he demanded racial and gender quotas be met.
3. Admiral Joanna Nunan, Superintendent, US Merchant Marines: she used to be the head of diversity, equity and inclusion at the Coast Guard Academy, which is why Pete Buttigieg hired her to be superintendent. Since she was hired there have been attacks against Christians and straight white males. Her focus has been on DEI rather than academics and infrastructure which has caused a drastic decline and recruitment and retention.

4. Lt. General Steve Gilland, superintendent of the United States military Academy at West Point:

- Lately there has been an unsettling focus on race and the diversity and equity, including office changes to their name to the office of engagement and retention.

- In 2023, a lawsuit was filed against West Point for blatantly discriminating applicants based on race.

- West Point now has a minor in diversity and inclusion which covers things like gender history, the evolution of the cross dressing in the military in gender norms and deconstructing patriotism.

- West Point also has something called a spectrum club, which is a group that is designated solely based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

- they have hosted diversity and inclusion conferences where there are sessions on unconscious bias, and micro inequalities.

- Gilland approved dropping duty, honor and country from their motto
5. Lieutenant General Stephen Whiting, commander of the US Space Command: he is famous for firing Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Lohmeier who spoke out against Marxism in the military.

6. Colonel Michelle Nash, Commondant of the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute: this is the DEI unit of the military, and the whole thing has to go. They focus on pride month and all sorts of nonsensical things that have absolutely nothing to do with warfighting. This is the wing that promotes Angela Davis and avowed communist during pride month.

7. Ashish Vazirani, acting deputy of the under Secretary of Defense for personnel and readiness: he promotes LGBTQ activism and is a staunch proponent of DEI.

8. Kathleen Hicks, deputy Secretary of defense: her job is to advocate for transgender and non-binary service members and promote cultural change through pride events. She believes the military has an unconscious bias in order to be successful they must undergo intense DEI training.
Read 5 tweets
Dec 28, 2024
I am not an expert in H1-B visas. I’m even less of expert in the field of tech and STEM. Art and literature are my thing despite my business degree in undergrad (which I only got because my parents wouldn’t pay for college unless it was a degree that they knew I could use to secure employment).

So in the last 24 hours I actually tried to do as much research as possible because I genuinely don’t know the arguments on both sides and the way I approach any situation, especially when it is related to a policy is to look at the arguments on both sides and try to figure out what I think is true and what I think fits with my values.

First, I want to say that we have a very serious illegal immigration problem and it’s going to be extremely difficult to fix it because we are going to get a lot of pressure from the left not to fix it. That is the first thing that has to be addressed in this country because that is of critical importance. Especially because so much taxpayer money is going to fund illegal immigrants and that must stop.

Second, as it relates to legal immigration, we have always been a country that has had legal immigration. My husband is a product of legal immigrants, who came here with absolutely nothing and literally worked their butts off to provide him with a good life. They are two of the most hard-working people I know, and they raised somebody who works just as hard to provide for his family.

The ultimate goal of any policy in America should be for the benefits of the country, it should be to further its prosperity and security and safety and freedom.

Therefore, in general, our legal immigration system is very complicated. Like all complicated bureaucratic things it has many flaws that we should debate and try to fix.
After listening to people who I think are smart on both sides of this debate, this is what I distilled the issues down to:

1. The side that is pro H1B visas wants to attract the best and brightest talent in the tech and STEM space to advance innovation.

2. The side that is against H1B visas believes that they have been co-opted and used to bring in cheap labor at the expense of American workers.
In 2023, we issued 10.4 nonimmigrant visas for people who visit the United States for tourism, work, business or education.

In 2023, we issued 562,976 immigrant visas and these are issued for people who want to permanently reside in the United States of America.

Work related Visas 2022 (2023 was not available):

1. H-1B (specialized knowledge bachelors degree or higher): 208,378

2. H-2A (temporary agricultural workers): couldn’t find the number.

3. H-2B (temporary non-agricultural workers): 66,000

4. J-1 (work study): 284,486

5. O (visa issued for extra extraordinary ability): 38,782

6. Employment based green cards: 140,000

We also gave out 55,000 visas for diversity candidates (?) and 60,000 visas for the refugee program. Although I’m very hesitant about that 60,000 figure because it doesn’t come comfort with what we know but whatever.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(