🧵🧵BREAKING: Trump signs new Executive Order defining DOGE & fighting back against lawfare and judicial overreach!
The new EO focuses on defining DOGE more concisely but underlying that appears to be a clear message to the courts - DOGE is legal and here is how it works. @realDonaldTrump @elonmusk @DOGE @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox
A number of the lawsuits challenging DOGE initiatives lob unsupported allegations about what DOGE might do based on what seems to be simple rhetoric on X or elsewhere. The purpose of this EO is really to better define and provide clarity regarding DOGE’s role and authority. This should provide ammo for the attorneys defending against the lawsuits the swamp is filing.
The core of the order is related to DOGE’s role in reducing the federal workforce. Remember - DOGE looks at the existing or potential software to improve efficiency so it makes sense that they would use that knowledge coupled with feasible software development solutions to provide input on the necessity of personnel.
Right off the bat Trump asks for a plan to reduce the size of government and initiates a hiring to firing ratio directive. The request for a plan requires that the OMB Director figure out how to reduce the size of the federal workforce through “efficiency improvements and attrition.”
The plan must include a requirement that an agency can only hire one new employee for every 4 that are terminated or depart.
This order will essentially modify the hiring freeze. The BEST part of this order is that the hiring ratio and freeze do not apply to public safety or immigration enforcement but a total freeze remains on the IRS.
The next part of the EO defines how DOGE plays a role in hiring. Remember that DOGE is fundamentally about using data and innovation to drive efficiency. To that extent, Agency heads are being asked to develop a “data-driven plan” with their internal DOGE teams regarding hires.
DOGE teams include (at minimum) a lead, an HR person, an engineer, and an attorney. The EO requires hiring be done in accordance with the law which will limit these nonsensical political lawsuits. This will also be easier to do because of the structure of the DOGE teams.
DOGE is also given limited “veto power” over hires. If the hire is not aligned with the law or otherwise appears wasteful then the team lead can say no. The agency head can override the team lead - which is required under the law - but will likely have to be able to explain his or her self if that happens frequently.
DOGE teams will then provide monthly hiring reports to USDS so the President and Elon can keep an eye on the project.
The EO also tells agency heads to prep for major lay-offs or terminations. These are called “reductions in force” or RIFs. The President wants to eliminate unnecessary employees not required by law. This means that anyone whose job is not required by statute or not in public safety/security or immigration enforcement is probably on the chopping block.
The President specifically points out DEI hires as being unnecessary and is clearly planning to terminate those personnel. He also is terminating anyone working on projects not required by law that run in opposition to his policies. This is well within his authority under the law and makes complete sense - why would he allow people to work on projects that are not required and he doesn’t like?
Trump also tipped his hand as to part of the legal strategy here. By noting that he is looking at employees that are typically not designated as essential during appropriations lapses he is signaling that he will use that non-essential designation as a legal justification for being able to terminate some positions.
Part (d) is 100% a legal maneuver. The President cites CFR 731.202(b) which is titled “Criteria for making suitability determinations.” This regulation is about ensuring federal hires are “suitable” for employment under the law. Anyone not meeting these standards is generally considered “unsuitable” for hire. Trump orders the OPM to initiate a rulemaking that will revise the CFR to include certain other criteria that would allow for termination of potentially undesirable federal employees. Trump is requesting 4 additions to the current rule:
1. Federal employees should be paying taxes just like the rest of us; 2. Federal employees should be legal citizens; 3. Feds must certify that they are complying with the law as it pertains to personnel practices… this basically means that you can no longer break the rules of employment and keep your job because you are buddies with the supervisor or you and the supervisor may get fired. 4. You can no longer steal, misuse, or “lose” government resources without risking termination.
These are very basic and common sense additions the will be a tremendous shock to these unaccountable bureaucrats.
Part (e) might appear to be boilerplate but it is important for legal reasons. Trump wants to clean house but the absurd amount of law that governs our nation is more than any one person can grasp. As such, Trump asks for reports on the relevant law so he can make sure he is precisely following the law when implementing these massive RIFs.
In Part(f) Trump makes people accountable for this order. The head of DOGE (USDS) is required to submit a report to the President within 240 days of the order so he can see how it is going and decide what to do next.
Section 4 provides exclusions for the military and allows for other specific exemptions to ensure we keep our country safe. It also allows for common sense exemptions from the OPM. This section both protects our nation and injects common sense humanity into the order to ensure it is successful.
The last part of the order is legal boilerplate. By defining DOGE better Trump is providing legal cover for the attorneys that have to defend against the lawfare against DOGE. I think this EO was another brilliant maneuver and will help clarify what DOGE is doing to the public. It should allow attorneys defending the President’s actions to do their jobs and clarifies that DOGE is about producing results.
Thanks for reading and please consider supporting us by watching the Tom Renz show here on X, subscribing here on X, checking us out at TomRenz.com and donating to GiveSendGo.com/renzlaw.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE: President Trump is doing a lot with executive orders and the left is suing him over and over again. These clowns are literally saying that the Take Care Clause of the Constitution demands Trump allow fraud and waste to occur. I’d argue that the Take Care Clause and the President’s enforcement discretion give him latitude to manage when laws conflict.
So how do executive orders work with regards to spending and what is the Take Care Clause all about? Thread below. @VigilantFox @gatewaypundit @GenFlynn
The President's authority to allocate or redirect spending through executive orders is limited and must be grounded either in statutory authority or the Constitution. In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the President could not seize and operate steel mills during a labor strike without statutory authorization. This meant that actions like this were exclusively within the purview of Congress, not the executive branch. In other words, the President cannot unilaterally redirect spending or take control of private property without explicit legislative backing.
The framework established in Zivotofsky v. Kerry, 576 U.S. 1 and reiterated in Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 divides presidential power into three categories:
1) actions with express or implied congressional authorization, where the President's authority is at its peak; 2) actions without congressional grant or denial, where there is a "zone of twilight" with potential concurrent authority; and 3) actions against the express or implied will of Congress, where the President's power is at its lowest ebb and must rely solely on his constitutional powers.
This means that the President's ability to redirect funds is strongest when supported by Congress and weakest when opposed by it.
LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE on the court issuing a TRO blocking Trump’s DOGE employees access to Treasury Data
@realDonaldTrump brought @elonmusk in under the reorganized USDS - now the US DOGE Service. As I chronicled elsewhere this was quite clearly legal and that action has not been challenged. What is being challenged is DOGE employees having access to Treasury Department Data Systems.
Yesterday, a comprehensive complaint was filed before an Obama appointed judge in NY. The 60 page - fairly complex - complaint and request for TRO was filed yesterday and somehow U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer was able to fully vet this complaint and grant the TRO the same night. While granting a same day TRO does happen, it is quite impressive that he was able to research and rule on such a complex complaint in such a short period of time.
Let’s talk about that TRO. @RealAlexJones @VigilantFox
When a complaint is filed in a court the complaint makes certain allegations, alleges facts to support those allegations, and then requests relief. In the case of this complaint the request for relief included a request for a TRO (Temporary Restraining Order) against the subject of the complaint. In other words they asked that Trump and DOGE be blocked from auditing treasury department data.
🧵🧵 USAID - Lawyer’s Perspective on @elonmusk & @realDonaldTrump Taking On Govt Waste
After digging into the real truth about DOGE (see the link to my other thread below) I decided that I should absolutely dig into the truth about the “shut down” of USAID. Just like the lies about DOGE - neither Trump nor Musk has not actually shut down USAID and they are currently just exposing the waste they have found. While I really cannot see a way to save something so corrupt, they have not actually even formalized their long-term plans for USAID yet.
Everything you are hearing from the left and the press is simply propaganda from people mad that their grift has been exposed and shut down. @GenFlynn @VigilantFox
As you can see in the announcement above, USAID has put everyone except “designated personnel responsible for mission critical functions, core leadership and specially designated programs” on administrative leave. This means the agency still exists and is still carrying out mission critical functions. So why all the screaming and crying from the Democrats and the left? Because Trump and DOGE do not believe that funding corrupt programs used to pad the pockets of corrupt political figures or other programs that do nothing to benefit America are actually mission critical. This means that those programs will likely not be continuing after the pause. Below are a few examples of such programs.
So USAID has not been eliminated and the idea that is has been is a lie. To further demonstrate this, you should recognize that the President likely does not actually have the authority to eliminate USAID entirely.
A number of people have correctly noted that USAID was created by an EO but they then mistakenly think that means Trump can end it by altering that order. That might be true except for the fact that USAID was eventually recognized under statutory law (this happened in 22 USCS § 6563 and other statutory references exist as well). Once an administrative agency has been created by statute it is unlikely the President would have unilateral authority to eliminate it… but again - Trump was very clever and did not eliminate USAID.
🧵🧵DOGE - A Lawyer’s Perspective on the @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump Policy Centerpiece
I inherently do not trust the media so I decided to look into DOGE myself and see what is under the hood. Initially I was quite concerned about the legality of a “new agency” created by executive order but that - just like everything else - is a lie put out by the mainstream. The order is here and the thread is below:
@VigilantFox
To understand anything the government does it’s usually best to start with the law or something else I might be able to sue over… in this case the executive order itself was the thing to see.
As you can see this document is barely 2 pages and certainly not written in legalise. While not a complicated read - the plan was brilliant. Trump did NOT actually create a new agency. Instead what he did was repurpose an existing agency - the USDS - into something more useful.
CORRUPTION?: The left claims that Fanni Willis had no conflicts in bringing the case against Donald Trump? Did you know that Kamala Harris and Fani Willis are connected?
Kamala Harris is part of a Fraternity/Sorority network - known as the Divine 9 - that continues to work together to promote leftists causes at any cost. This is the same network that Lindsey Davis - the infamous host of the Presidential debate - is part of.
The Weaver Investigation has found evidence that this network was involved in the 2020 election steal and the case Fani Willis brought against Trump.
Was there any legitimacy to this case? Or was the case against Trump simply another leftist smear against the President? The question is becoming more legitimate every day.
You see the evidence and hear their words here. You decide. Praying people vote #MAGA #Trump #Trump2024 @realDonaldTrump
Let's take a deeper look at Ray McClendon.
NAACP - Political Action Chairman