Dr. Deborah Birx Makes Two Shocking COVID Admissions
The “conspiracy theorists” were right again.
🧵 THREAD
The narrative surrounding the COVID crisis is crumbling, and now Dr. Deborah Birx is admitting what the “conspiracy theorists” knew all along in an apparent effort to save her own skin.
Dr. Birx, who served as White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under President Trump, admitted during a recent appearance on Piers Morgan Uncensored that the government botched the COVID response by overlooking early treatment.
“What I witnessed was a lot of undiagnosed disease that could have been treated early that then resulted in COVID deaths,” Birx lamented.
Birx literally echoed what dissident doctors had been saying from day one: Early treatment saves lives.
Instead of listening, they silenced doctors like @MdBreathe, threatened to take away their licenses and let people die.
In a 2022 exchange with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Birx was cornered into admitting that the Biden administration’s claims about the jab’s efficacy were based on “hope,” not science.
JORDAN: “When the government told us the vaccinated couldn’t transmit it [COVID], was that a lie or a guess?”
BIRX: “I think it was hope that the vaccine would work in that way.”
Now, Birx is throwing more health officials under the bus, claiming the vaccine rollout also ignored the science. She stated that the mRNA jab was developed to target those at high risk of severe illness, not specifically the general population.
“The messenger RNA vaccine should have been rolled out for the people that were at risk for severe disease because that’s what the vaccine was developed for,” Birx said.
She also confessed the COVID shot was never “designed” to prevent infection:
“That is not what the COVID vaccine was designed to do. It wasn’t designed against infection.”
Now she tells us.
This goes against the narrative we were all fed—that everyone needed to get vaccinated to “protect grandma.”
People lost their jobs because of this lie.
Four years later, they’re reluctantly admitting that young people were never the intended primary target for the jab—and that it wasn’t even designed to prevent infection.
This thread isn’t over yet, but while you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more reports like this one.
In another surprising moment, Piers Morgan linked SSRIs and antidepressants to mass shootings, saying, “There’s a direct correlation.”
Morgan made these comments just before announcing he is “in favor of RFK trying to pull America away from its addiction to mind-bending drugs.”
“You have millions of young people who are taking completely unnecessary mind-bending drugs for things like anxiety, depression, often self-diagnosed. And guess what happens?
“You then have a load of weirdo-loner kids running around with their brains scrambled who commit mass shootings and stuff like that. There is a direct correlation, and we’re going the same way in Britain. Young people are getting massively overmedicated. So I am actually in favor of RFK trying to pull America away from its addiction to mind-bending drugs,” Morgan said.
Read more about the link between SSRIs and mass shootings on @MidwesternDoc’s page.
The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings
@MidwesternDoc The Big Pharma-funded media’s lies that endless boosters are needed to “keep people safe” and that SSRIs have no link to mass shootings are now falling apart.
With RFK Jr. in charge at HHS, real conversations are finally happening—and people are waking up. Thank goodness.
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more.
In other news, epidemiologist @NicHulscher just presented irrefutable proof that the COVID shots should be BANNED. See his evidence below:
A bombshell vax vs. unvax study is now seeing the light of day — and the results are staggering.
Dr. Marcus Zervos led the study, but he decided not to publish it because “publishing something like that, I might as well retire. I’d be finished.”
Here’s what the study revealed:
• Vaccinated children were 4.29 times more likely to have asthma.
• Three times higher risk for atopic diseases (like eczema).
• Nearly six times higher risk for autoimmune disorders — a category that includes over 80 different diseases.
• 5.5 times higher risk for neurodevelopmental disorders.
• 2.9 times more motor disabilities.
• 4.5 times more speech disorders.
• Three times more developmental delays.
• Six times more acute and chronic ear infections.
• In nearly 2,000 unvaccinated children, there were zero cases of ADHD, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, or other psychological disorders.
• The study’s conclusion is devastating. It states: “[I]n contrast to our expectations, we found that exposure to vaccination was independently associated with an overall 2.5-fold INCREASE in the likelihood of developing a chronic health condition when compared to children unexposed to vaccination.”
If this study could be sidelined for producing inconvenient results, how many others have met the same fate?
But the truth is, you don’t need a study to notice the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
Have you ever heard the Declaration of Independence read out loud?
You should. It’s the greatest break-up letter ever written.
At just 33 years old, Thomas Jefferson, with cold moral clarity, told the British government to pound sand:
“Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends [life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness], it is the Right of the People to alter or to ABOLISH it.”
The power of that line isn’t just what it says. It’s how it’s said.
Jefferson wasn’t writing from a place of outrage. He was transmitting conviction — moral clarity delivered from a steady frame of mind.
It’s said Jefferson revised the Declaration of Independence with the help of Franklin and Adams dozens of times before it was finalized.
And that deliberate, cutting language paired with emotional steadiness is precisely why the words still land nearly 250 years later. 🧵
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below. 👇
“WOW!” Joe Rogan’s brain nearly exploded when Dr. Matthew Walker explained what just a one-hour difference in sleep can do.
When we spring forward for daylight savings time, “we see a subsequent 24% INCREASE in heart attacks.”
But this is the part that blew Rogan’s mind:
“In the fall, in the autumn, when we gain an hour of sleep, there’s a 21% decrease in heart attacks. So it’s bidirectional.”
“Wow!” Rogan said, stunned.
“That’s how fragile and vulnerable your body is to even just the smallest perturbation of sleep,” Dr. Walker explained.
And if losing or gaining just one hour can swing heart attack risk that dramatically, imagine what years of bad sleep are doing to your body. 🧵
Sleep deprivation isn’t just making people tired—it’s locking trauma into the nervous system and fueling chronic disease.
When sleep breaks down, emotional injuries don’t heal.
If you don’t get real restorative sleep, your brain can’t process emotional injury, your immune system can’t reset, and your body stays stuck in perpetual stress mode.
That’s not just fatigue—that’s biological harm.
Sleep isn’t a luxury. It’s a physiological necessity for emotional and nervous system healing—and when it’s disrupted, trauma doesn’t fade, it lives in the body.
So why is no one talking about the connection between trauma, sleep, and long-term health?
Trauma isn’t just something that happened to us “in the past.” It can shape our lives every single day.
Trauma is a biological injury that can lodge in the nervous system, quietly reshaping behavior, health, and perception for decades.
It affects us in the past and present and will continue to affect us in the future if not released.
Even small childhood experiences—if left unresolved—can ripple outward into lifelong patterns most people never connect back to the original cause.
Trauma isn’t just the big, obviously traumatic things.
REPORT: Australia has just introduced what may be the most extreme hate speech law in Western history.
The new 2026 “Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill” punishes speech that causes fear—even if no harm occurs—with up to 5 years in prison.
It gets worse.
The law applies to nearly everything: tweets, blogs, memes, even quoting scripture online. It explicitly states that it doesn’t matter if anyone actually felt hatred or fear. And it allows the government to go back in time and charge people for things they said before the law existed.
The bill also gives police power to ban groups without due process—including groups outside Australia—and to imprison citizens for up to 15 years for “supporting” them.
And while it claims to offer religious protections, a rep from the Attorney General’s Department confirmed that Catholics and Christians will not receive those protections—even as Jewish, Islamic, and Sikh Australians do.
If you post a Bible verse today, what’s stopping them from calling it hate speech tomorrow?
DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.
Meanwhile in the UK, students are being monitored for thought crimes through a government-funded video game at schools.
Kids as young as 11 could be flagged as potential terrorists simply for questioning mass migration.
The game, Pathways, puts students in control of a white character navigating so-called moral dilemmas. If they express the "wrong" opinion, share the “wrong” video, or attend a protest defending British values, their extremism meter climbs.
The penalty? Counseling for ideological thoughts or a referral to PREVENT—Britain’s official counterterrorism program.
Even researching immigration statistics is treated as suspicious. If a student dares to “look into it more,” the game warns: you’re being radicalized.
Looking up the truth is now a red flag.
This isn’t education. It’s psychological conditioning—pressuring children to stay silent, conform, and report their peers for independent thought.
Peter Navarro told Fauci to his face that he had “blood on his hands” for keeping hydroxychloroquine from the American people.
Navarro walked into the Situation Room with a huge stack of papers, saying hydroxychloroquine worked. The one person who helped Fauci escape Navarro was Vice President Mike Pence, who told him to “take this outside.”
This is a story that comes from Dr. Fauci himself.
He says he never wanted to contradict President Trump’s COVID messaging, but felt compelled to do so out of a responsibility to “tell the truth.”
For people like Fauci, “telling the truth” doesn’t mean transparency. It follows a very different logic, and once you see it, everything about COVID suddenly makes sense. 🧵
Something dangerous has happened to science.
It didn’t happen overnight, and it didn’t happen by accident.
Science, once a method for discovering truth through open debate and constant challenge, has been replaced by something else entirely: scientism.
And unlike science, scientism does not tolerate dissent.
Anthony Fauci not only promoted scientism, he took it to an extreme. In the interview below, he actually argued that he is “the science.”
And if you don’t agree? You’re anti-science. And dangerous.
Scientism is not skepticism, rigor, or evidence-based reasoning.
Scientism is not science.
It is the elevation of credentialed authority over inquiry itself.
Instead of asking whether claims are correct, scientism asks who is allowed to speak.
And once that shift occurs, truth is no longer discovered—it is declared.
People are still losing feet and toes to ulcers when a $10 remedy could save them.
Standard treatment often fails and results in amputation.
But something remarkable often happens when patients try a compound called DMSO: 70% of patients heal completely.
The difference is life-changing. And hardly anyone knows it exists.
Why? Because DMSO is cheap, unpatented, and it threatens the wrong industry. 🧵
In 1961, a compound called DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) shocked doctors and took the world by storm.
It could relieve pain in minutes, reduce inflammation, heal wounds, and restore function to injured tissues.
It was safe and powerful—and completely unprofitable for Big Pharma.
So naturally, it was suppressed by the system and hidden from the people who needed it most.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full 8,000+ word report below.