I injected the horse tranquilizer Ketamine and tracked my brain data for 15 days. It completely scrambled my brain.
In a world-first we answered the question ‘what happens to the brain before, during, and after ketamine treatment?’ We also discovered how long it took for my brain to return to ‘normal’.
The results surprised me. 🧵
0/ Before taking ketamine, my brain activity followed fixed, predictable patterns, as observed over 10 days of measurement. Imagine the brain as a global air traffic network, where each airport (or brain region) has consistent flight routes and traffic volumes—like the steady flow of planes between New York and London.
After ketamine, my brain’s activity patterns were completely scrambled. Instead of predictable routes between major hubs, traffic was rerouted to smaller, less-used airports across the U.S., Europe, and Asia.
This means brain activity that was once rigidly structured became more flexible and varied, potentially unlocking new connections and ways of thinking.
Top images: My absolute functional connectivity (brain traffic patterns) for minutes 5-15 after I received 57.75mg intramuscular injection of ketamine.
Bottom images: My relative functional connectivity (brain traffic patterns) changes after the ketamine took effect, starting at minutes 15-25.
1/ After three days, my previous patterns started to take hold again, closing what many refer to as the "therapeutic window” that opens post a ketamine or psychedelic administration.
Top images: Baseline measurements of my brain 5 days prior to receiving ketamine.
Bottom images: My brain activity for days 7-11 after having received ketamine.
2/ This image shows my functional connectivity (traffic patterns) was stable for days 1-5 prior to ketamine and showed large changes during the ketamine session. Post Ketamine, my functional connectivity decreases for days and then begins trending to normalize back to his baseline.
3/ Normally it would be hard and next to impossible to get this kind of high fidelity brain data, but it was made easy with Kernel Flow.
Flow is the non-invasive brain interface technology I dedicated seven years of my life building (and personally investing $64 million). The technology in Flow is similar to the device you’ve put on your finger to get your heart rate and blood oxygenation.
4/ I founded Kernel in 2015 because I thought it pairing the human mind with AI was going to be really important to the future.
Then, when becoming the most biologically measured person in history (Blueprint + Don’t Die), I discovered that getting high quality, functional brain biomarkers was expensive and nearly impossible. Yet critically important for measuring the effects of drugs and therapies, cognitive performance, disorders and decline.
fMRI could do it in some contexts, but the barriers made it practically infeasible. It was nearly impossible to get functional measurements of my brain.
Our inability to easily and cheaply measure our brains/minds is a big problem especially because we have a global mental wellness crisis.
So, an exceptionally talented team and I built Kernel Flow from scratch, including building a custom ASIC (Application-Specific Integrated Circuit), the entire electronics stack, signal processing and interpretation algorithms.
It's the world's first, high fidelity mass market brain interface that could be used at scale.
We did the heavy lifting of publishing several papers on its reliability and capabilities including demonstrating cognitive impairment from alcohol and the effects of ketamine (in which I participated).
5/ The early data is impressive.
Flow measurements of brain function in response to cognitive and emotional stimuli have been shown to predict with 90% accuracy if a patient will respond to treatment from depression before they have their first dose.
6/ If you're interested in brain health, you can now join one of two clinical trials:
1) Healthy aging - Kernel has distinguished normal cognitive changes from early disease signs using brain activity patterns.
Kernel Flow is a promising tool to detect mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and achieve high accuracy in distinguishing between MCI and healthy individuals. Healthy volunteers can participate and will also receive a free, detailed report of brain function at the study’s end.
Location: Culver City, CA.
Sign up at kernel dot com / life
7/ Sign up for the clinical study on Depression
Kernel has developed a new brain imaging technology with potential breakthroughs in treatment-resistant depression. While early, results have been shared with scientists and psychiatrists. They aim to secure regulatory approvals, expanding into neuropsychiatric disorders to transform psychiatric diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring for more precise patient care.
Cities where sites are currently located: California locations: Costa Mesa, La Jolla, Los Angeles, Sunnyvale. Other locations: Seattle, WA and Columbus, OH
Full clinic list with details is at kernel dot com / research
8/ Kernel papers
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last week, @chamath and I had dinner. He had this to say:
"Bryan's skin is incredible. His skin is like a porcelain dolls. Both my wife and I were like, we've never seen skin like this. It's incredibly soft. It's the softest skin I've ever touched in my life."
Supple skin is proof of young biological age, and a power-law marker of systemic health and efficient rejuvenation.
Let's look at the science 🧵
0/ Supple skin is proof of young biological age, and a power-law marker of systemic health and efficient rejuvenation
Achieving supple skin at 47 is far more than a cosmetic milestone—it's a potent, integrative indicator of overall health. In many biological systems, vital functions follow a power-law distribution, where small improvements in underlying systems can result in disproportionately large benefits in overall function.
1/ Here's what's behind supple skin
Supple skin is the product of complex mechanisms working optimally in synchrony, which signifies that your body is effectively countering age-related degradation and malfunctioning at multiple levels.
This robust state not only delays the visible signs of aging but also suggests that your cellular and metabolic functions are operating efficiently—a hallmark of lower biological age and enhanced longevity.
Love and deep social bonds can reduce mortality risk by up to 91%.
A landmark meta-analysis with 309k participants found meaningful and complex social relationships reduced mortality risk significantly.
Happy Valentine's Day. 🧵
0/ Close relationships may predict longevity better than wealth, status, IQ, or even genetics.
+ An 80-year Harvard study found that deep social bonds are the strongest determinant of long, happy lives. The effect transcends culture.
+ A study of 97,062 Japanese participants found that never-married men had a 91% higher risk of death; for women, 46%.
+ In Europe, a study of nearly 1 million people found marriage consistently associated with lower mortality across six countries.
+ A meta-analysis of 7.8 million participants across 22 studies showed a 22% and 33% higher mortality risk for unmarried women and men, respectively.
1/ A strong relationship can increase your likelihood of happiness by 5x, more than wealth and career success combined.
The Harvard study found that love and deep connection buffer the effects of aging. Couples over 80 yrs old with strong social ties reported better health, higher happiness, and even greater pain tolerance.
In the U.S., five decades of General Social Survey (GSS) data show married people consistently rank happier than the unmarried—by 30 points on a 200-point scale.
I don't want to do this, but you need to hear this.
Sleep deprivation lowers IQ, increases toxic beta-amyloid buildup, and raises brain damage markers linked to stroke.
Learn how high quality sleep boosts the brain.
🧵
0/ Sleep deprivation is brain damage
Shorter sleep correlated with lower IQ-test performance in school children.
1/ A single night of sleep deprivation increased beta amyloid load in the brain by 5%, this is the plaque-causing protein beta-amyloid in the brain by 5%.
We’re designing rewards for the Don’t Die ecosystem—earn for hitting health markers, buying DD-approved products, dining at DD-certified restaurants, and more.
omg within 5 minutes of this post I received 50+ DMs
So many of my friends are expressing extreme caution—saying it’s hard or impossible to prevent bad behavior from ruining an ecosystem. Seems like a cool problem to solve. Who’s done it right?
I've upgraded to something else: total plasma exchange.
Steps: 1. Take out all blood from body 2. Separate plasma from blood 3. Replace plasma with 5% albumin & IVIG
Here's my bag of plasma. Who wants it?
🧵
0/ Total Plasma Exchange TPE Therapy is an advanced longevity therapy with great effects in removing toxins, waste products, old misfolded and glycated proteins and immune complexes. It has shown measurable effects in delaying and reversing age-related disease including dementia, as well as the capacity to reduce biological age based on various parameters, including blood proteomics and biological aging clocks.
1/ A pre-print aimed to test the effect of different TPE protocols on 36 various epigenetic aging clocks caught our attention.
Three TPE protocols were compared:
1) Monthly Protocol: TPE with 5% albumin, once a month. 2) Bi-weekly protocol: 2x TPE with 5% albumin in one week, followed by 3 weeks break. 3) BI-weekly protocol with IVIG: same as 2 in addition to 20g of IVIG following each TPE session.
IVIG: Intravenous immunoglobulin is a plasma-derived pooled anti-body, which helps to bolster the immune system and prevent infections following TPE by offering a general replacement of the antibodies removed with the TPE. Offers protection following TPE, additionally the immune modulation can boost the biological rejuvenation measured in the blood immune cells PBMCs.
Hi friends, I am again posting about red meat and I come in peace.
Last week I shared why I don’t eat red meat. I did this because people have been asking me about this topic for 3.5 years and I’ve responded neutrally saying...here is what I do, but you do you. Just be sure to measure your biomarkers. It's also what I said last week.
That didn’t stop many people from losing their minds. It’s legit an interesting psychological phenomenon.
Let me be clear: if you like red meat, eat red meat. I choose not to and am providing you an explanation why. You can agree or disagree.
My team and I are conducting an experiment and are following the evidence as we understand it and transparently sharing my biomarkers.
Nutrition is not a solved science so there will inevitably be disagreement. I’m being transparent about our research, reasoning and measurement.
Whatever you decide, I'm wishing you the best.
The primary reasons I don’t eat red meat:
1) My goal is longevity and other foods (outlined in my Don’t Die nutrition guide) have more robust evidence for longevity
2) Is red meat good or bad? The evidence tilts towards red meat possibly creating health risks which is enough of a reason to exclude it from the protocol.
3) The foods we’ve selected to consume have me maintaining world leading biomarkers.
🧵
0/ Criticisms to my rationale
+ Most studies with evidence against red meat consumption are observational and not interventional, so not enough to establish causation
+ Harm originates from how the meat is consumed as opposed to the meat itself: like suggesting that the problem with a hot dog is the bun and ketchup, and not the processed meat itself.
+ Healthy user bias; assumption that people avoiding red meat are healthier due to unrelated factors (this assumes bias due to the bad reputation of red meat being bad for health, and hence health-aware people avoiding it)
1/ My counterarguments
+ Whether one likes it or not, the largest number of data points we have on nutrition, by far, come from observational studies.
+ Small studies (even if interventional) are not sufficiently powered to refute the millions of data points from observational studies.
+ Even studies presented as favorable to red meat consumption claim evidence of no harm at best, and no evidence of superiority to other diets.
+ Some of the studies favorable toward red meat consumption are funded by the meat industry (study example below)
+ Healthy user bias is a common challenge in epidemiological studies of habits perceived as unhealthy, such as red meat consumption. Past experience with similar “presumed” unhealthy habits, like smoking, has shown that when these habits are thoroughly studied over time, they often prove to be harmful.
+ When you have all evidence pointing in one direction, the “burden of proof” is on the side bemoaning the quality evidence to produce better evidence if possible, not vice versa.
+ Critics completely ignored that we went beyond “observational” to present molecular and cellular mechanisms of harm linked to red meat consumption, based on high quality research data.
+ We also spoke to genetic, demographic and other risks
+ An observation related to this last point: the demographic group most vigorously defending red meat - healthy adult males - has the highest health risks from consuming and overconsuming it.