Plenty of Parallels between MAGA and the NAZI Movement
Folks, sometimes when I’m waging war against the MAGA Nazis on the twitter machine I come across something I read and then want you to read too.
This is why I am going to copy and paste this short piece from someone who would prefer to remain anonymous (with their permission!)
This analysis shows the parallels between MAGA and another fascists movement from 100 years ago who you know as the Nazis.
Here it is:
The comparison to Nazi Germany isn’t just a stretch—it’s a direct historical parallel unfolding in real time. Trump’s playbook is eerily similar to Hitler’s rise to power, and the signs are all there for those willing to see them.
Hitler exploited economic hardship and blamed outsiders and minorities for the country’s problems—Trump does the same with immigrants, refugees, and political opponents.
Hitler rose to power through democratic means, then dismantled democratic institutions from within—Trump is following the same script, stacking courts, gutting federal agencies, and openly threatening to imprison political opponents.
Hitler used propaganda to create an alternate reality, convincing his followers that the press was the enemy and that only he could be trusted—Trump does the exact same thing, calling the media “fake news” and relying on disinformation networks like Fox News and Truth Social to keep his base insulated.
Hitler incited violence, encouraged street militias (Brownshirts), and claimed victimhood when the establishment fought back—Trump unleashed a violent mob on the Capitol, still calls them “hostages,” and openly praises those who attack his enemies.
Hitler demonized intellectuals, the press, and political opponents, purging the government of those who wouldn’t bend the knee—Trump has threatened mass firings, pledged retribution, and promised to punish those who oppose him.
Hitler normalized hatred toward specific groups, gradually escalating to persecution—Trump’s Muslim bans, mass deportation plans, and open endorsements of ethnic cleansing are already setting the stage for something darker.
Hitler weaponized the legal system, using loyal judges and officials to crush dissent and silence opposition—Trump is actively packing the courts, pressuring the justice system, and vowing to use the presidency to destroy his enemies.
Hitler aligned himself with wealthy elites and big business, convincing them he was the only one who could preserve their power—Trump is backed by billionaires, corporate interests, and power-hungry enablers who see him as a tool to strip democracy down for profit.
Putin, Orban, and Maduro are modern authoritarians, no doubt, but Trump isn’t just one of them—he’s a textbook case of history repeating itself. If people refuse to see it, it’s not because the signs aren’t there—it’s because they don’t want to believe it’s possible.
By the time Hitler fully seized power, it was too late to stop him. What makes anyone think we get a different ending this time?
Throughout history, leaders who sought unchecked power justified their actions in strikingly similar ways. Their own words reveal the mindset of those who see themselves as above the law:
Adolf Hitler: The good of the state stands above the law.
Benito Mussolini: Everything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state.
Napoleon Bonaparte: I am the revolution.
Francisco Franco: I am responsible only to God and to history.
Donald Trump: He who saves his country does not violate any law.
The message is clear. When a leader believes they are the law, democracy is already in jeopardy.
Know someone who needs this info? RT it!
Do you appreciate my fusion of political science, history, data, and current events? I can’t make this content without YOUR support. Support Indie media by subscribing to The Cycle 👇 thecycle.substack.com/p/living-histo…
🧵The Tipping Point Is Upon Us:
Will MAGA Simply Ignore the Courts?
Ok folks, we’re three weeks in and have already entered the “constitutional crisis” phase of things.
I want to draw your attention to something critically important in the coming week. The federal courts have started to respond to Elon Musk’s illegal attack on federal agencies and programs like USAID.
This is going to create a real litmus test for the survival of our democracy.
Much of what Trump and Elon are doing is so flagrantly illegal, it is hard to imagine much of it surviving judicial review, even at the Supreme Court level.
Yes, the Federalist Society controls the Court, but on occasion at least three of their justices, Gorsuch, Barrett, and Roberts have ruled on the side of the Constitution against Trump. There is one major exception and that is the immunity case where they not only did their best to create an untouchable presidency, but also did it in a way to drag the case out of being tried before the election. So we know they have it in them.
I expect the lower courts to reject most of Trump’s power grab. All we can do is hope that those 3 justices recognize by creating the Imperial Presidency, they are rendering their own power obsolete.
The sitting Vice President went public with what us MAGA watchers already knew: there is a forceful movement within MAGA that argues federal court orders should simply be ignored.
This 🧵 is about the effects of partisanship on public opinion.
Please RT & share it! #TheMoreYouKnow
This book, The American Voter, first published in 1960, is the Bible of my subfield in political science: political behavior.
Political behavior is the study of the way people think, feel, and act with regard to politics and includes everyone from political office holders and candidates (elites) to your average man on the street voters.
As soon as phones became prolific enough to allow for scientific polling political scientists launched surveys to figure out what Americans knew about their government.
The results were shocking. It turned out that other than who the current president is and vague impressions of what the two parties stand for, average Joes and Janes knew next to nothing about their own government!
Trump, MAGA, and the Breaking of the American Mind:
A Majority of Republicans Say They are A-OK With Trump Suspending the Constitution
Have you ever had a random conversation with someone that just sort of stays with you over time?
I had one such conversation back in 2019 or so participating in an event.
The conversation was with a graduate student assistant from Rwanda who was working the event. That evening a few of us gathered under the Virginia summer sky to night gaze and hang out.
Always eager to talk with people from other cultures, and especially from places with a political history like Rwanda’s, I was eager to ask about Rwanda’s recovery from the genocide that ripped the country apart in a 100 day blood bath during the Rwandan civil war in 1994.
The victims of the Rwandan genocide were the Tutsi ethnic group, murdered in a wave of violence unleashed by the assassination of the Rwandan president by Hutu extremists, another Rwandan ethnic group. The genocide left somewhere between 500,000 and a million people, mostly Tutsis but also including moderate Hutus, dead.
An Interview with Matthew Taylor, author of The Violent Take it by Force: The Christian Movement that is Threatening our Democracy.
If you’ve been following the transition of the Republican Party from the party of Reagan into whatever the hell it is now you’ll know that the once “useful idiots” of the Republican Party, the Christian Right, now rule the party and they have big plans for Trump 2.0.
As Dr. Taylor points out in our interview about his book The Violent Take it by Force: The Christian Movement that is Threatening our Democracy, for all the attention January 6th received, a key part of that story has been largely ignored.
I’m aware many of you want/need actionable advice on things you can do to help thwart what is coming so you don’t marinate in hopelessness. As Dr. DOOM, I’m not well-positioned for this role!
That’s why when I came across Emily Galvin-Almanza's threaded tweet offering tangible, actionable ideas for real resistance that can really matter I knew I needed to get it to you.
So, I reached out to Emily and offered her the opportunity to write up her ideas to share with The Cycle’s audience and I am delighted she agreed.
What follows is Emily’s article.
I, too, believe in the power of the corporeal.
But then again, I am also one of those elder millennials whose life has been a slipstream from watching 9/11 on my college dorm room TV set to having my high school friends sent to die in Iraq as the rest of us back home marched in the streets to no avail, to the financial crisis that would cost so many of us our future stability, to an impossible housing market, couples having crisis conversations about whether to bring kids into this world, and now enduring the start of Trump 2.0. It’s been a ride. And unlike my parents, it has not been a ride where the marches I have taken part in have singularly changed the course of history.
🧵Why Democrats Failed to Save Democracy
Identity Politics and Microtargeting Killed The Party's Brand
Once upon a time the Democratic Party, with its regional base in the Southern U.S. was the party of slavery, and then of segregation.
If you spend much time on social media you already know this because of the many times Trump voters have told you, “but Democrats are the party of segregation!”
Back in the 1950s and 1960s during the Jim Crow Era, the Democratic Party had morphed into an unholy alliance merging a party of liberal Whites and racist White Southerners into one big coalition that by staying together, dominated Congress for decades.
By the 1960s, the activism of MLK. Jr and thousands of other largely unnamed civil rights activists finally forced the Democratic Party to choose: preserve their large coalition or end segregation. In part due to the assassination of JFK, then-President Lyndon Johnson sided with civil rights for Blacks signing both the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Acts of 1965 and in doing so, set off the realignment that would lead to total domination of the South by the Republican Party just a few decades later.
Via Nixon’s Southern Strategy, shrewd GOP strategists like Lee Atwater and Roger Stone recognized that white Southern conservatives were there for the taking, and took them they did relying on various racist dog whistles such as the Willie Horton ad and Reagan’s 1980s Black welfare queen propaganda.
Meanwhile, the Democratic Party began to absorb liberal Republicans, predominantly in the North East and West Coast. Ideological liberals became Democrats and ideological conservatives became Republicans through a process known as party sorting and the modern 270 Electoral College map with its handful of swing states became the norm of American presidential elections.