Using corn to make fuel increases the price of food.
This is not disputed.
Yet some Republicans are insisting on keeping costly ethanol provisions of the Democrat “green new deal” in the Republican budget reconciliation plan.
I asked Grok if ethanol subsidies and mandates increase food prices. Here’s Grok’s answer:
Ethanol mandates and subsidies can indeed push up food prices, and here’s how it plays out. In the U.S., the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requires blending ethanol—mostly made from corn—into gasoline. Subsidies, like tax credits or direct payments to producers, sweeten the deal for ethanol makers. This jacks up demand for corn, a staple crop for both fuel and food. When more corn gets diverted to ethanol refineries, less is left for livestock feed, processed foods, or export markets. Basic supply and demand kicks in: reduced corn supply for food purposes means higher prices for corn-based products.
Look at the numbers. In 2022, about 40% of U.S. corn production—roughly 5.3 billion bushels—went to ethanol, according to the USDA. That’s a massive chunk of a crop that also feeds cattle, pigs, and chickens. When corn prices rise—say, from $3 a bushel to $7, like they did between 2020 and 2022—feed costs for livestock climb too. That ripples through to higher prices for beef, pork, eggs, and dairy at the grocery store. A 2011 National Academy of Sciences study pegged the RFS as bumping corn prices by 20-40% in tight supply years. More recent analyses, like from Iowa State’s CARD in 2023, suggest ethanol policies still add about 10-15% to corn prices annually, depending on harvest yields and global demand.
It’s not just corn, either. Land that could grow wheat, soy, or other crops gets planted with corn instead because ethanol keeps corn profitable—subsidies have historically pushed corn’s return per acre above other grains. The USDA says cropland devoted to corn hit 92 million acres in 2023, crowding out alternatives. Less wheat or soy means tighter supplies and higher prices for bread, cooking oil, and tofu too.
On the flip side, ethanol backers argue it’s not the mandates alone—global factors like weather, oil prices, and trade wars mess with food costs too. They’re not wrong; the 2022 Ukraine invasion spiked grain prices worldwide, ethanol or not. Plus, ethanol coproducts like distillers’ grains get fed back to livestock, offsetting some feed cost hikes. A 2021 Renewable Fuels Association report claimed this keeps the food price impact under 5%. But that’s a tough sell when corn prices drive so much of the ag economy—USDA data shows a $1 increase in corn per bushel adds about $0.40 to a pound of retail beef over time.
Globally, it’s messier. In poorer countries, where people spend 30-50% of income on food (vs. 10% in the U.S.), ethanol-driven grain price jumps hit harder. The 2007-2008 food crisis partly blamed U.S. ethanol policies for spiking corn and tortilla prices in Mexico—FAO estimated a 10-15% food price bump there tied to biofuels.
So, yeah, ethanol mandates and subsidies generally nudge food prices up—how much depends on harvests, markets, and policy tweaks. Without them, corn might stay cheaper, but gas prices could climb unless oil steps in. It’s a trade-off: fuel security vs. food affordability. What’s your take on balancing those?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Key Takeaways: The January 6 pipe bombs played a role in diverting resources and facilitating the breach of the Capitol.
🧵Our report details, “[d]espite the threat the pipe bombs posed to Congress and the public…federal law enforcement has refused to provide substantive updates to Congress about the status of the investigation.”
🧵 Last night Trump endorsed the idea of eliminating the Department of Education!
On February 7th, 2017, the US Senate confirmed Betsy DeVos as Trump’s Secretary of Education.
Purposefully, on that same day, I introduced HR 899, a bill to terminate the Department of Education.
🧵 I remember meeting Betsy DeVos for the first time at the White House Christmas party and that uncomfortable moment when I told her I was trying to eliminate her department.
To my surprise she quietly agreed.
She said publicly this week she would eliminate the department!
🧵 I have reintroduced this bill each Congress, and I have taken care that it is always designated as HR 899.
Many people like that my bill is only one sentence long. No beating around the bush.
Yesterday my high school sweetheart, the love of my life for over 35 years, the loving mother of our 4 children, the smartest kindest woman I ever knew, my beautiful and wise queen forever, Rhonda went to Heaven. Thank you for your prayers for our family in this difficult time.
She was valedictorian at our high school where we went to the Prom together, accepted at MIT and Harvard, earned a Mechanical Engineering degree from MIT, and devoted her life to our family.
We spent last week touring Mt Rainier with our grandson - she was the best mammaw ever! We love you Rhonda.
Americans are suffering under crippling inflation, and the Federal Reserve is largely to blame.
During COVID, the Federal Reserve created trillions of dollars out of thin air and loaned it to the Treasury Department to enable unprecedented deficit spending.
🧵 By monetizing the debt, the Fed devalued the dollar and enabled free money policies that caused the high inflation we see today.
Monetizing debt is a closely coordinated effort between the White House, the Fed, Treasury Department, Congress, Big Banks, and Wall Street.
🧵 Americans see their savings and wages evaporate due to the actions of our central bank pursuing inflationary policies that benefit the wealthy and connected.
If we really want to reduce inflation, the most effective policy is to end the Federal Reserve
🧵 At the time of that breakfast with Scalia, John Boehner was Speaker of the House and Barack Obama was President.
There was concern that Obama was doing things we hadn’t authorized and Boehner had convinced most of my GOP colleagues there wasn’t anything we could do about it.
🧵 Scalia finished his breakfast and began to speak. He started by saying that being a referee between us and the executive branch was not his job.
He explained that his job as a jurist was to determine if there was harm and what the remedy might be.
🧵 Occasionally, constitutionality of a law was a question, but only as a side effect of Scalia’s job, which was to determine if someone had been harmed and what the remedy was.
He was adamant that his job was not to referee disagreements between the executive & the legislature.
🧵I once had breakfast with Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and about 18 other members of Congress in a private room at the Capitol Hill Club in Washington DC.
He was invited to speak on the topic of “restoring the constitutional balance of government.”
🧵 At the time of that breakfast with Scalia, John Boehner was Speaker of the House and Barack Obama was President.
There was concern that Obama was doing things we hadn’t authorized and Boehner had convinced most of my GOP colleagues there wasn’t anything we could do about it.
🧵 Scalia finished his breakfast and began to speak. He started by saying that being a referee between us and the executive branch was not his job.
He explained that his job as a jurist was to determine if there was harm and what the remedy might be.