Can AI write a good abstract for a research paper?
Here's a comparison of ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Deep Seek, and Grok:
1. ChatGPT o1
I uploaded a draft of my paper and asked ChatGPT o1 to write a precisely worded abstract of 150 words foregrounding my argument.
This is a useful abstract but not very precise. It stays within the word limit though.
It understands the argument quite well but renders in a language that is a bit too far from my style.
During reasoning, it brought up something in Chinese too. I mention in the paper a couple times but there is no Chinese text in the paper.
2. Gemini 1.5 Pro
Disappointing. It summarizes the main points of the paper but a abstract is not a summary.
It doesn't foreground the argument and doesn't stay within the word limit.
3. Claude 3.7
Very impressive. Stays within word limit. Understands the argument very well and foregrounds it.
This made me think of my paper in a new light.
4. Deep Seek
This is more of a summary of the paper. It understands the argument but doesn't foreground it.
Also, it goes a little over the word limit.
5. Grok 3
Understands the argument and starts the abstract quite nicely.
Adds a couple of details that aren't useful, but overall it's helpful. Also, it stays within the word limit.
When it comes to academci texts, Claude seems to perform relatively better than every other model.
I'd suggest using any app you find helpful. Don't copy and paste what AI generates. Use it as your thinking/critique partner and write your own content.
Found this thread helpful?
1. Scroll to the top and repost the first post to share it with your friends.
2. Follow me for more threads on how to use AI apps for academic purposes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr Ally Louks's viral PhD thesis (130M views) on the politics of smell redefined the way people talk about smell.
Everyone wants to read her thesis, but it's unavailable until 2028
Here are 10 books on the politics of smell that you can read right now:
1. The Smell of Slavery
1. The Smell of Slavery by Andrew Kettler
Shows how white slave owners defined Black, African bodies as noxious and deserving of enslavement.
Smell was used to dehumanize Black folks who were equated with animals by white slave owners.
2. The Foul and the Fragrant by Alain Corbin
Considered a foundational text in smell studies.
Shows how the bourgeois nose associated bad smells with the poor and how deodorization became a tool for state control in 18th and 19th century France.