When the UK government rolled out the "Living with Covid" policy it simply scrapped protections and shifted to personal responsibility. For most, it meant "back to normal." For Clinically Vulnerable people, life became harder.
1/🧵
The plan was based on a single assumption: that vaccines alone would be enough... vaccines due to be withdrawn this Autumn.
But for millions who are Clinically Vulnerable, vaccines weren’t a magic bullet. Protection wasn’t universal and some were left with little to none.
2/
😀Mask mandates ended
📥Free tests were phased out
👩👩👧👦Self-isolation was no longer required
Covid was treated as a personal problem, not a public health issue. If you got sick, you were on your own.
3/
They decided not to buy Evusheld - a preventative antibody treatment that could have protected immunocompromised people. Yet, the other OECD countries did act provided this life-saving option.
Antiviral treatments were, for many, equally inaccessible.
For Clinically Vulnerable people, "Living with Covid" meant being shut out of society.
Without any effort to control infections some people found that they couldn’t safely return to work, school, use public transport, or even go to the doctor for basic health needs.
5/
Air quality was suddenly no longer a priority so businesses, schools, and hospitals still lack sufficient ventilation. Indoor public spaces remain high-risk for airborne disease transmission, but risks are ignored.
6/
Three years later, the numbers tell the story:
- Sickness absences have increased
- Many have suffered Long Covid
- Clinically Vulnerable people continue remain disproportionately impacted by severe disease, sequelae and death
7/
And yet, the public narrative continues to past tense the virus "During Covid..." even though we are not post-Covid, we are *with* Covid.
8/
"Living with Covid" was never about living with it.
It was about moving on and forgetting, leaving the vulnerable to fend for themselves.
9/
It didn’t have to be this way.
We could have invested in ventilation, supported mask wearers, and made public spaces safer.
Instead, those who needed protection the most were simply abandoned.
10/
Three years on, what have we learned?
More importantly, when will we finally recognise that protecting the most vulnerable by providing clean air not only creates a more inclusive society but it also benefits everyone?
11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Would you support the development of a more diverse portfolio of vaccine formats and antivirals, both as part of future pandemic preparedness plans and during [.] 'peace time' to ensure that Clinically Vulnerable groups are adequately protected?"
1/
"Absolutely, I think it is really important to make sure that we have good therapeutics and vaccines for the whole population."
2/
Q - Why is it important to have that breadth of formats?
...not many [immunosuppressed] were involved in the initial trials.
We now know [.] that booster doses help in terms of vaccine efficacy.
Find out more about what led to his reaction below ⬇️
1/🧵
Do you agree that mRNA COVID-19 vaccine protection has been shown to wane after 5-6m?
WSL: Yes
Covid-19 has not transitioned into a seasonal virus like influenza?
WSL: Yes
If so, why did the JCVI not recommend more frequent vaccinations for all clinically vulnerable groups?
2/
To explain:
"Clinically Vulnerable" is defined by the JCVI in the vaccine Green Book. They are all those who qualify for annual autumn vaccines based on risk.
A small subset are also offered vaccines in spring. Those 75+, care home residents and severely immunosuppressed. 3/
🚨Dame Kate Bingham🚨
Dubbed the "hero in a pink jacket 💕"
On Evusheld:
"I felt very strongly [.]. We were following a very clear 2 tier strategy where the CV immunocompromised were being deprioritised [.] I felt that was *manifestly* wrong both ethically and morally [.]"
1/🧵
The above video was taken out of sequence. The below should give more context...
KB "So actually, the first goal was around protecting the UK population."
CTI [Hugo Keith KC]
"Do you think you succeeded on securing or making available those monoclonal antibodies?"
KB "No!" 2/
Kate goes on to make the argument that by not protecting this population, we were also promoting viral mutation and the evolution of variants.