After my tweet about athletes in suits, a few people asked for my opinion on various players. The opinion is always the same: the clothes are too small; the combos are often bad taste. I will show you a basic transformation in the next few tweets. 🧵
First, let's look at Lebron. Here he is in two different white double-breasted suits, both outfits worn similarly (with white sneakers).
Which outfit do you like better? Please choose before moving on.
If you said the first, then we share the same taste. In this case, iIwill tell you how to avoid the second.
When people get into tailoring, they often have a very clinical view of how something should fit. "Trousers should be slim" or "shoulder seam should be on shoulder bone."
Since many are not used to tailoring, they often think that a proper suit jacket or sport coat is too long. This is natural because their reference point is casualwear, such as bomber jackets or trucker jackets. Those are indeed shorter
They also have in their mind that trousers should be slim bc you don't want to look like this meme.
The first step out of this is to rid yourself of the slim fit mind virus. Also totally disregard designers and trends. Think first of how a bespoke tailor would make a garment.
I can't list all the rules in this thread—and anyway, if you're interested, I've done many threads about this already—but a basic concept is that fit and silhouette are two different things. Fit is about whether the collar hugs your neck and whether things pull or pucker.
The irony is that everyone today thinks that slim is better, but most of the problems you see in tailoring—collar gap, shoulder divot, buckling lapel, pulling at the button, trousers clinging to the leg, etc—are a result of clothes fitting too slim.
Once you nail fit, there's silhouette. The term silhouette refers to the outline (or shape) of your clothes once you take away the details. Notice how this garment broadens the person's shoulder line and makes their chest look bigger. this is the result of careful tailoring.
The reason why Lebron looks better on the left is because the garment has *shape*. The chest is nice and round; the jacket is longer. The garment has swagger. By contrast, the outfit on the right has no verve.
Ask yourself: does left-pic Lebron look like "baggy 1990s manager?"
None of these outfits look good to me because the tailoring is not very impressive. It all looks like early 2000s trends, done 20 years too late, and produced using a made-to-measure factory system. The clothes have no shape; they just cling to the body.
Many people, including me, like Colman Domingo's style. Beyond the high level of taste—meaning, the way he combines clothes—there's the matter of shape and drape. These clothes fit well, hang well, and have a distinctive silhouette. They're not just replicating his body.
I will do a thread another time on how to wear tailoring with better taste. But on a very basic level, many athletes look bad in tailoring bc they are using MTM block systems reliant on 20 year old trends that are both out of date & unflattering on them.
I say this with no malice. I don't know any of these people and hold no ill will to them. I only lay this out bc everyday guys who are less famous and earn less money make the same mistakes, and I wish better for them. IMO, tailoring on the right is better bc of these concepts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.