From "Sexual racism: Intimacy as a matter of justice,"
"In the case of sexual racism, one is seen as less physically attractive based on racial stereotypes or norms.
Intimacy is a matter of justice. We ought to care about the distribution of this opportunity."
In her 2020 article "Colorblind and Colorbound," Jonahs describes how color-blind ideology is giving an explicit defense of race as an acceptable category of exclusion.
"Colorblind ideology upholds White supremacy, yet remains the dominant racial ideology."
From a 2019 paper, "Are Racial Preferences Morally Defensible,"
"Our deep-rooted racial preferences are reinforced by patriarchal ideology.
White people have a moral responsibility to question, reconsider and re-cultivate their desires for a racially integrated society."
From "Is Sexual Racism Really Racism?"
"Sexual racism is a form of racial prejudice enacted in the context of sex or romance.
Sexual racism challenges the idea of racial attraction as solely a matter of personal preference."
How does this term effect policy?
"Platform design can reveal opportunities to reshape troubling patterns of intimate contact."
"User profiles laced with phrases like "No blacks," "No Indians," or "Only white boys," have given rise to critical research on sexual racism."
"Platform design can reveal opportunities to reshape troubling patterns of intimate contact."
As I said, this belief isn't confined to academia.
The U.S. government actually funded a study looking into how to reshape racial preferences.
The effect of this new form of White sexual guilt can be seen in the following study:
White college liberals prefer their own race, but signal the opposite:
"White [college] liberals exhibit less ingroup favoritism relative to conservatives so they do not appear prejudiced."
In the speed dating study, they rated Black daters highly, despite refusing to date them:
"White liberals revealed an ingroup-favoring bias in Study 2 but an outgroup favoring bias in Study 1. Perhaps there is a unique element of liberalism within a college population (Study 1) not present in a broader adult population (Study 2) that would cause liberals to strongly resist the status quo and subsequently prefer racial minority individuals as dating partners."
It isn't just White women and men that are targeted with this guilt.
Even minorities express guilt for their attraction to Whites.
Hundred of articles have been written justifying their desires by blaming White supremacy.
The more they desire White men, the more they signal how much they hate White people.
They say they hate Whites, while fetishizing the idea of being colonized by White men. An expression of their guilt.
It's YOUR fault they fetishize you.
This is true for all minorities that fetishize Whites.
They'll say we're subhuman, as they fetishize being colonized by us.
They "deserve" access, not only to White nations, but White bodies.
Whether in the porn industry or in college, Whites are constantly subjected to emotional blackmail, all rooted in resentment and anti-White racism.
White men are "racist" for preferring their own women.
This is even true among homosexual men and women, as they exhibit the same racial preferences that straight people do.
An Asian female artist, Mitski, made a music video with a White man rejecting her for a White woman.
Pages of anti-White screeds from both minority men and women follow:
"Dear yt women with blonde hair and blue eyes, please shut up you're still the beauty standard no matter what."
"As an arab woc, a muslim girl living in germany, I relate to this so much."
"As a muslim arab syrian girl living in Germany, I'm always jealous of other girls, and how they're valued by boys."
The belief that minorities have a right to White bodies doesn't work the other way around.
"Exclusion of White people is to protect us from racism. It's not remotely comparable."
The same logic is applied to White nations. Exclusion for me, not for thee.
You're guilty either way.
They desire you because of White supremacy, which must be dismantled.
They're owed access to your body, because it's "justice," for White supremacy.
This belief that White women owe their bodies to minority men as recompense for racism is as old as the Civil Rights era.
This use of feminism as an excuse to promote interracial fetishization was the subject of a recent study, "Misogyny and Nationalism promoting Interracial Relationships between Korean men and White women."
It examined youtube videos with hundreds of thousands of views, and thousands of comments from Korean men that pit feminist Korean women against supposedly ideal White women.
She also notes the increasing number of popular Korean tv programms that positively depict Korean male celebs in relationships with White women (the opposite of what Hollywood does in the U.S.).
In Korean media, Korean women are depicted as materialistic, and White women "grateful."
One commenter saying, "I assumed Western European women were headstrong feminists. These women are calm, quiet, and adept at catering to men’s desires. Could it be that Korean feminism is fake? Swedish women are so kind and timid."
"The grass is greener" mentality exists for every race, and feminism is usually the excuse.
I think a big driver of Asian fetishization among White men is similar, but mainly lies in the way the porn industry humiliates White men by constantly defiling the image of their woman.
A 2024 study funded by the U.S. Census Bureau "for research purposes" wanted to test whether lack of "diversity" or "inherent racial preferences" is driving the lack of interracial marriage.
The justification for which is that race-mixing "reduces inequality between racial groups."
It found that increasing exposure to opposite-sex members of different class groups generates a substantial increase in interclass marriage, but increased exposure to other racial groups has "no detectable effect on interracial marriage.
"Residential segregation accounts for nearly half of marital homophily by class, but less than 10% of marital homophily by race."
The disappointment is clear by the final paragraph: "Understanding how these preferences are formed is an important next step for future research."
"Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau."
Why would they distance themselves from the study that they funded? 🤔
Why is the primary concern is with increasing White-Black intermarriage.
You wouldn't expect the U.S. Government to be funding research on how to increase Black-White intermarriage in the most effective way.
Have we not already achieved integration?
So the next step appears to be to directly push race mixing by focusing on preferences themselves.
Eldridge Cleaver exemplifies this. He admitted to stalking White women, and raping them out of a sense of revenge.
They've been doing this since the earliest days, but when White men lynched them for it, history was rewritten by Marxist intellectuals. (Thread bellow.)
As Jewish author, Kristen Fink, put it in "The Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World,":
White men in the South were just "protecting their human chatel." Not from rape, but from the sexual liberation the Black man provides.
Eldridge Cleaver went from raping White women, to being embraced as a success story of Black Conservatism in the 1980s:
"Every time I'm embracing a Black woman, I'm embracing slavery, and when I put my arms around a White woman, well I'm hugging freedom"
-Civil Rights Activist, Eldridge Cleaver
White women aren't just the ultimate prize of revenge, they're also a symbol of "freedom" for these Black men. I wonder who put this idea in their heads.
The rape of White women by Black men is actually liberating and wholesome. Stop being so racist.
89% of the 1.2% of Polish women in mixed marriages, married other Euros.
"Polish women preferred partners from United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and France while Polish men tended to be married to women from Ukraine, Russia and Belarus."