Upon review, Vance's stunt is even worse than imagined. It was a product of ineptitude:
Z went into a detailed recap of Russia reneging on agreements (to underscore the need for guarantees-b4-ceasefire). Vance (a DEI admit at Yale Law) is overwhelmed and /1
Z went into a detailed recap of Russia reneging on agreements (to underscore the need for guarantees-b4-ceasefire). Vance (a DEI admit at Yale Law) is overwhelmed and /1
knows he has no answer. (This is the problem with relying on talking points, versus actually understanding the topic. He's scanning his mind going, "I don't have a rehearsed talking point on this!!! What do I say when he he's done talking?!") 2/ So, instead...
He interjects like he had a spasm up his ass and, knowing he has to change the subject, has a bizarre outburst about the need to show gratitude. (Hm, what does that have to do with what the guy was sayign about Russia and ceasefires?) 3/
He was in over his head. He knew it. He had nothing but dumbed down talking points in his 'arsenal.' Z was giving him a quick history lesson and, having no way to rebut such, he went for a distraction.
A complete mess of a person who blew up a chance at peace.
A complete mess of a person who blew up a chance at peace.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
