Waltz tells what happened after the fight in the Oval Office - the Ukrainian team was in tears, but Zelensky stayed argumentative
Q: After the press left, you and Rubio told Zelensky he should leave the White House?
Waltz: We had a meeting, and advised the president that after that insult in the Oval Office he shouldn't engage further. We told Zelensky and his team.
To be clear, this was not an ambush - that claim is categorically false.
1/
Waltz: We had a beautiful setting in the East Room ready for both leaders to sign that would have bound the US and Ukraine together economically for a generation.
It involved critical minerals, investment, and commitments from the UK and France to put boots on the ground.
This could have been a step toward ending the war and stopping the destruction. 2/
Waltz: The President [Trump] was frustrated and angry because it’s unclear if Zelensky truly wants to stop the fighting. The President and VP said enough is enough.
This [lecturing] was the wrong approach, wrong time, and the wrong president to try to do this kind of a thing. This is not Joe Biden. The entire world saw that, crystal clear.
3/
Q: How did Zelensky react after press left? Was he surprised?
Waltz: No. His team was. His ambassador, and adviser were practically in tears, wanting this to move forward. But Zelensky was still argumentative.
I said “Mr. President, time is not on your side here, on the battlefield, and in terms of the world situation. And most importantly, USAID, and the taxpayers' tolerance, is not unlimited”.
4/
Waltz: I think Zelensky is used to hearing that “as long as it takes” and blank check from Biden.
He has not gotten the memo that this is a new sheriff in town.
This is a new president, and we are determined to take a new approach towards peace. 5/
Waltz: Zelensky did his country a true disservice. If you disagree with how we're gonna end the war - fine.
But you do that behind closed doors, not the way this was done. It was wholly unacceptable. 6X
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trump about Zelenskyy for Politico: “He doesn’t have anything until I approve it. So we’ll see what he’s got.”
Still, he believes he could have a productive meeting this weekend.
“I think it’s going to go good with him. I think it’s going to go good with Putin too.” 1/
Zelenskyy plans to bring a new 20-point peace framework to the meeting in Florida on Sunday.
The proposal includes a demilitarized zone and focuses on US security guarantees, territorial control in Donbas, and the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. 2/
Trump expects to speak with Putin “soon, as much as I want.”
The comments came a day after Zelenskyy spoke with Trump envoys Witkoff and Kushner. Zelenskyy called that a good conversation. 3/
Russia isn’t winning — but Putin wants you to believe it is.
After 4 years of war, Ukraine still stands. Russians failed to take Kyiv and achieve a breakthrough. Putin’s strategy now is to convince the U.S. that Ukraine cannot succeed — Shaheen & McConnell, Washington Post. 1/
In 2022, U.S. intelligence predicted Kyiv would fall within weeks. Instead, Ukraine stopped Russia, pushed it away from Kyiv, and confined Russian forces to the east. Those early predictions were wrong — then and now. 2/
After nearly four years of war, Russia has lost about one-third of its strategic bombers and more than 1 million killed or wounded. Equipment losses remain higher than Ukraine’s, despite Moscow’s full war economy. 3/
Rutte for ARTE: Russia is the next threat and EU is already in danger
Russia spends around 40% of state budget on defense and about 10% of national income on military. It has developed missiles capable of reaching the EU within 5–10 minutes
There is no “safe” Europe anymore 1/
Rutte: Peace is hard to predict because Russia is unpredictable
Security guarantees must ensure that after any peace deal or long-term ceasefire, Ukraine stays strong and Russia cannot attack again
If Russia gains control over Ukraine even 5% defense spending won’t be enough 2/
Rutte on Ukraine’s defense: First, strong Ukrainian armed forces. Second, an EU-led coalition of the willing.
NATO is already deeply involved. We coordinate weapons deliveries, training and lessons learned from the war through NATO–Ukraine structures and coordination hubs. 3/
Trump should call Putin’s bluff now. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Steven Henriques write in TIME arguing that Trump is overestimating Putin - his ability to wage war, his economic stability, and the “cards he holds.” 1/
Henry Kissinger once wrote: “A bluff taken seriously is more useful than a serious threat interpreted as a bluff.” This insight fits Russia today. Putin projects strength, but the fundamentals behind that image are eroding fast. 2/
Trump’s reaction to the Ukraine peace proposal revealed how deep the deadlock remains. Territorial concessions, control of Donbas, security guarantees, and limits on Ukraine’s army still block any realistic path to peace. 3/
“I helped. I set up the position, dug, handed ammunition. I wanted to live.
Russians wouldn’t sort out who’s theirs and who’s not. There’s an order not to take prisoners” — Danylo, Russian POW, who stayed in Ukrainian trench for almost two months. 1/
Danylo: I was captured while moving to a position. My partner was with me. He ran for cover. While he was running, two bursts of automatic fire went off. My partner was dead.
Then one of Ukrainian soldiers ran out. I raised my hands, threw away my rifle and surrendered. 2/
Danylo: I served as an anti-tank unit commander and received two awards for a deployment to Karabakh.
Then I struck an officer, and was sent to Novocherkassk — a criminal case was opened. The case was dropped, and I was sent to Donetsk. From there I was sent to the Rusyn Yar. 3/