๐จ NEW TOOL: PEOPLE RELATIONS (BETA) ๐จ
๐ DIG DEEP. CONNECT THE DOTS.
Iโve built a powerful tool to help you search names and uncover how people, entities, and organizations connect. Visualize relationships in an interactive graph and see whoโs tied to whom โ all in just a few clicks.
Hereโs what you can do:
โ Search by Name โ Enter any keyword and quickly see matching individuals
โ Color-Coded Categories โ Instantly differentiate connections like FAMILY, WORK, POLITICAL, LEGAL, and more.
โ Interactive Graph Exploration โ Pan and zoom with ease. Download your findings as SVG for offline analysis.
โ Bullet Summaries โ Each node can include key info to help you grasp context at a glance.
๐ก Whether you're investigating personal ties, mapping historical links, or demanding greater transparency, this BETA tool places massive relational data at your fingertips.
โ ๏ธ Still ironing out the edges and @watilo will go fix it โ thanks for your patience! Data-heavy and best viewed on desktop.
๐ Try it now: [link in next post]
Let's test how AI responds when you bring up George Soros in the context of documented history. Spoiler: it gets cagey.
Here are three verifiable facts, with receipts:
1๏ธโฃ It was the Clinton Administration's stated SOP to align their foreign policy with Soros, comparing him to a country unto himself.
2๏ธโฃ Soros co-chaired the Central Europe and Eastern Europe committee for NED, and the founder of NED considered Soros a key partner for US intelligence operations in the post-CIA age.
3๏ธโฃ Open Society Foundations was one of the NGOs involved in drafting the failed Afghanistan constitution.
Next up: let's ask AI some questions and see how it tries to tiptoe around these facts.
Gemini, pt. 1: "There's no definitive evidence of a formal, official cooperation between the U.S. government and George Soros on foreign policy."
Gemini, pt. 2: "there's no definitive evidence to suggest that George Soros directly worked with US intelligence agencies or their NGOs."
This happened in the year 1984. How many "sponsorships" with American media outlets have happened since?
GPT confirms that FCC disclosure rules only kick in when money changes hands for actual broadcast time.
Sponsorships labeled as "training" or "exchanges" let mainstream media quietly take funding or perks without ever having to tell the public. cc:@EagleEdMartin
@EagleEdMartin I think I'm onto something here. That the NGO money laundering happens through "training" and isn't reported because of this FCC loophole.
๐จ ANNOUNCING NEW TOOL: NED NETWORK NAVIGATOR (BETA) ๐จ
๐ง AI-POWERED. CONGRESSIONALLY FUNDED. HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT.
I just shipped a crawler-indexer that rips apart the National Endowment for Democracyโs flagship Journal of Democracy archive โ then stitches every author, NGO, and article summary into one laser-focused query interface. This is more than search; this is x-raying a decades-old influence machine at machine scale.
Hereโs what it does:
โ Link the Whole Web โ One click surfaces every author โ NGO โ article connection, exposing the revolving door between grant-hungry nonprofits, State-adjacent think tanks, and โindependentโ scholars.
โ Instant Context Summaries โ AI distills thousands of pages so you see the thesis, not the fluff. No more slogging through academic euphemisms.
โ Prefix Hunter Mode โ Type โcolor revโ and catch every variant (โcolor revolution,โ โcolor-coded revolutions,โ etc.) that editors bury in footnotes.
โ Role Detector โ Flags when an author quietly moonlights on an NGO board funded by NED dollars.
โ NGO Cross-Check โ Pull EIN links straight to ProPublica filings; follow the money in two clicks.
โ Source-First Design โ Every claim traces back to the PDF or muse.jhu.org page, so NED canโt cry โmisinformation.โ
Why this matters:
For 40 years NED has branded regime-change lobbying as โdemocracy promotion,โ funneling your tax money into overseas activists while scolding domestic populists as threats. Their own journal is the narrative factory โ academics launder talking points that later justify sanctions, censorship, or NATO expansions. By making the entire archive searchable, we finally turn the microscope back on the operatives who insist theyโre safeguarding freedom.
This is what happens when you weaponize code instead of platitudes.
๐ Dig in, map the network, and decide for yourself: [link in next post]
Open Society Foundation (OSF) gave grants to Al-Haq, a group designated as terrorist by Israel. Israel passed this intelligence onto the CIA, but the CIA claimed insufficient evidence for designating these groups as terrorists.
Today, we also learned that OSF also gave the International Republican Institute (IRI) and National Democratic Institute (NDI) grants. The IRI and NDI are subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a quasi-governmental NGO which works closely with the CIA.
Did Soros money influence the CIA's refusal to designate Al-Haq as a terrorist organization?
I cannot emphasize how serious it is that IRI and NDI accepted Soros money. These aren't normal NGOs. These are supposed to be "soft power" vehicles operating on the behalf of the United States government.
Of all the discoveries, this makes me the most angry. Soros may very well have compromised our national security in a direct way. cc: @elonmusk
Turns out, George Soros gave $1.7 million to the IRI and $1.5 million to the NDI... two D.C.-based "democracy promotion" fronts tied to the State Department and both subsidiaries of NED.
๐ Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton, Joni Ernst, and Dan Sullivan all actively sit on the IRI board.
These groups were created to run on U.S. taxpayer dollars, not Soros money.
Why are either IRI or NDI taking his money? He's buying influence over both parties, and the GOP is letting him in the front door.
Hey @SenateGOP : why are you letting Soros fund your foreign ops machine?
Thanks to @bullfrog35 for spotting this.
In 22 CFR ยง 67.4, it says NED has a special responsibility to operate openly. @EagleEdMartin shouldn't it be disclosed that NED/IRI/NDI has taken money from a far left, regime change foundation?
@EagleEdMartin On their website, it says "NED raises limited private contributions from foundations, corporations and individuals to support some of its non-grant related activities." But the descriptions of the grants themselves seem to be very much grant related activity.
Ever wonder where George Soros is sending his money? ๐ I've extracted and published the public Open Society Foundations grant database in spreadsheet format. This is your chance to dig through the receipts. ๐๐งพ
๐บ๐ธ Want to follow the money? See who's getting funded, where it's going, and what it's paying for.