1/ An interesting analysis by ChatGPT on the psychological aspects of the meeting between Zelensky and Trump-Vance is circulating online.
It reveals a masterclass in gaslighting, manipulation, and coercion from Trump and his entourage. Let’s break it down.
1/n
2/ Blaming the victim:
Trump tells Zelensky, “You allowed yourself to be in a very bad position.”
This is a classic abuser’s tactic—shifting blame onto the victim. As if it’s Ukraine’s fault that russia invaded and is killing its people.
3/ Forcing “gratitude”:
Vance pressures Zelensky to say “thank you.”
This is a toxic tactic—forcing a victim to express gratitude for essential aid, then later accusing them of ingratitude if they dare to defend their rights.
4/ Manipulating the idea of “peace”:
Trump says Zelensky is “not ready for peace.” But what he means is capitulation.
This is manipulation—replacing the concept of just peace with surrender.
5/ Denying the reality of war:
Trump repeatedly says Zelensky “has no cards.”
This is another abusive technique—devaluing the victim’s efforts and portraying them as powerless without the mercy of the “savior.”
6/ Devaluing war victims:
“If you have a ceasefire, you have to accept it so that the bullets stop flying and your people stop dying.”
But a ceasefire without guarantees is just a chance for russia to regroup and strike again. Trump ignores this reality.
7/ Dominance tactics:
Trump interrupts Zelensky, cuts him off:
“No, no, you’ve said enough.”
“You’re in no position to dictate to us.”
This is psychological pressure—establishing a hierarchy where Zelensky is treated as a subordinate.
8/ Forcing capitulation under “diplomacy”:
Vance claims “the path to peace is through diplomacy.”
This is classic manipulation—framing surrender as “diplomacy” while letting the aggressor continue unchecked.
9/ Projection & blame-shifting:
Trump tells Zelensky, “You are playing with the lives of millions.”
But this is exactly what Trump does—shifting responsibility to Zelensky while ignoring russia’s role as the aggressor.
10/ Creating the illusion of debt:
Yes, the U.S. supports Ukraine. But framing it as “you must obey, or you get nothing” is not partnership—it’s coercion.
Support should not come with ultimatums that undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty.
11/ Erasing Ukrainian resilience:
Trump claims, “Without our weapons, this war would be over in two weeks.”
This devalues Ukraine’s fight, portraying its survival as solely dependent on the U.S., rather than recognizing its own strength.
12/ Conclusion:
Trump and his team used a full arsenal of gaslighting, victim-blaming, forced gratitude, manipulation, and coercion.
This was not a negotiation. It was an attempt to pressure Zelensky into accepting conditions deadly for Ukraine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I was recently cleaning up my Twitter account and noticed that some U.S. professors who are originally from russia had stopped following me. I couldn’t care less. But it is very telling.
1/n
2/ People in the West still believe in the russian opposition and the “good russians” hypothesis. They think that, somehow, it is all Putin’s fault. In reality, Putin is just a symptom of a much bigger problem, called “russian imperialism” or “great russian culture.”
3/ “Good russians” jubilantly cheer in the streets, welcoming the genocide of their neighbors.
“Good russians” openly dance and celebrate with russian flags in European countries while systematically attacking Ukrainian immigrants.
Satellite images prove that a russian LNG ship transferred cargo to a Chinese tanker off Malaysia.
1/n
2/ On October 18, 2025, a russian LNG tanker named Perle transferred approximately 170,000 cubic meters of liquefied natural gas — originating from the US-sanctioned russian Portovaya LNG facility in the Baltic Sea — to the Chinese tanker CCH Gas.
3/ The ship-to-ship transfer took place about 90 kilometers east of the Malaysian Peninsula, in international waters off Malaysia’s coast.
Far-right and far-left are often portrayed as polar opposites. In reality, they are two sides of the same coin. The fact that both are sympathetic to russia is just another nail in this coffin.
In political science, this is known as horseshoe theory.
1/n
2/ Horseshoe theory - an idea that the far left and right, rather than being at opposite ends of a straight line, actually curve toward one another like a horseshoe. They mirror each other in their rejection of the center and willingness to excuse or enable authoritarian regime.
3/ The clearest historical example is the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, when Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed a non-aggression agreement that allowed them to divide Poland between them.
In some sinister way, I think that many Europeans quietly hope the war between russia and Ukraine doesn’t end soon.
1/n
2/ Because once the war ends, russian troops will not simply disappear — they’ll move. The garrisons now pinned down in Eastern Ukraine will redeploy to Finland, to the Baltic borders. And make no mistake — russia will keep producing weapons and expanding its military complex.
3/ Ukraine is ready to defend its borders. Peace will only make Ukraine stronger. But Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania cannot stop a russian onslaught on their own. Once russian units shift westward, they’ll be facing NATO directly — and Europe will have no more buffer.
That’s what the U.S. Secretary of Defense recently implied by suggesting that women are weaker, less able to handle the stress of war, not made for combat.
But the only problem: he is so completely wrong.
1/n
2/ There soon may come a time when the U.S. military will invite Ukrainian women to train their Marines — because these women have already proven what true courage looks like.
3/ More than 60,000 women now serve in Ukraine’s Armed Forces. Unlike men, they are not required to stay and fight. Under martial law, they could have left the country — but they chose to stay. They volunteered.
Russia will continue to escalate its aggressive actions against NATO countries.
Drones over Poland, military planes over Estonia, espionage and sabotage across other NATO members — all of it is part of a growing pattern.
1/n
2/ There are two reasons for this:
1.A strategic deadlock in Ukraine.
2.The perception that the West is not ready for a real fight — despite its overwhelming economic and demographic advantages.
3/ Yes, the russians have far fewer resources than NATO. And, yes, they’ve been undermined by Ukrainians.
But they see that, psychologically, the West is unprepared. And they will continue escalating their provocations — for now, hybrid and just short of open conflict.