AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture
Mar 5, 2025 1 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I've been contacted by several people about someone using a review of T cell responses to sars cov 2 to claim that immunopathology and harm to T cells themselves does not exist. Simply put, the review is not exhaustive and is not focused on T cell dysregulation, that topic is beyond the scope of the review, and indeed, there are papers in a separate field of sorts that do cover this.

My specialization was T cell death and aging itself, and I posited and discovered a shared mechanism of death and differentiation in 2011.

I will address the claim of no harm to t cells here:

The claim that "COVID does not harm T cells" can be directly challenged by evidence from several studies.

These papers collectively demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 infection, including its long-term manifestation as long COVID, induces specific and persistent damage to T cell populations and functionality in ways that distinguish it from typical viral effects.

First, a Nature Immunology study from January 2022 "Immunological dysfunction persists for 8 months following initial mild-to-moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection" shows that COVID-19 leads to a prolonged reduction in naive T cells (both CD4+ and CD8+) in individuals with long COVID, persisting up to eight months post-infection. Naive T cells are essential for initiating adaptive immune responses to new threats, and their depletion compromises the immune system’s ability to respond effectively over time. This sustained loss is accompanied by elevated interferon levels (IFN-β and IFN-λ1), suggesting a chronic inflammatory state that disrupts T cell homeostasis. Such a long-term impact on the naive T cell pool is not a standard feature of recovery from other acute viral infections like influenza, directly contradicting the assertion that COVID-19 does not harm T cells. The paper states it was unique to covid and compares it to other viral infections. This effect may not completely persist, however, what it represents is sloughing of the T cells.

Second, the Immunity study "Robust T cell responses to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine compared to infection and evidence of attenuated CD8+ T cell responses due to COVID-19" provides evidence of specific harm to CD8+ T cells, the cytotoxic T cells critical for killing virus-infected cells. The study found that unvaccinated individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited significantly reduced levels of spike-specific CD8+ T cells compared to vaccinated individuals without prior infection. Even after vaccination, those with a history of COVID-19 showed weaker and less functional CD8+ T cell responses, a phenomenon likened to the immune damage seen in chronic viral infections like hepatitis C or HIV. This attenuation indicates that SARS-CoV-2 inflicts a lasting impairment on CD8+ T cell effector function, undermining the claim that T cells remain unharmed by COVID-19.

Thirdly, there is a paper in JCI insight showing T cell exhaustion to other infections following a covid infection. It is often overlooked by naysayers. insight.jci.org/articles/view/…

Finally, a Nature Immunology study from January 2024 "Long COVID manifests with T cell dysregulation, inflammation and an uncoordinated adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2" reveals further harm through T cell dysregulation in long COVID patients. The research identified increased frequencies of exhausted SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells, alongside CD4+ T cells primed for inflammation, and a lack of coordination between T and B cell responses. T cell exhaustion—where T cells lose their ability to effectively respond to antigens—is a hallmark of immune dysfunction and was notably absent in individuals who fully recovered from COVID-19 without long-term symptoms. This chronic exhaustion and misalignment of the adaptive immune response highlight a specific deleterious effect of SARS-CoV-2 on T cells, refuting the idea that COVID-19 leaves them unscathed.

Together, these studies demonstrate that COVID-19 harms T cells in multiple ways: it depletes naive T cells, impairs CD8+ T cell functionality, and drives chronic exhaustion and dysregulation, particularly in long COVID. These effects persist beyond the acute phase of infection and differ from the transient T cell changes seen with many other virusescontrary to the claim that "COVID does not harm T cells."Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD

AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fitterhappierAJ

Jan 11
Since 2020 I have been arguing that Covid harms T cells, the cells responsible for controlling viruses

I am going to go over this article in the Daily Mail that poses it as a "new" hypothesis by @_lukechafer
1/ Image
Image
Great article @_lukechafer

One thing I see is that the article claims rising infections are "prompting" scientists to ask if something else is going on

That "something else" has been clearly described many times by me in 2020 on twitter and in publications Covid harms T cells Image
Image
There is a second point about the 2025 publication about reduced numbers of T cells

Something I have been saying and published also since 2020 Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 4
In August an immunologist declared the "Leonardi Effect" had received a "decent burial"

Fast forward to today: a new preprint shows what I warned about in 2020

Persistent SARS-CoV-2-induced impairment of CD8 T cell responses to community-acquired pathogens

I was right
1/5 Image
Key finding: Post-COVID patients show markedly reduced T cell reactivity to common pathogens (influenza, Staph, VCZ) which is evidence of lasting immune dysregulation favoring secondary infections and viral reactivation

Link:


2/5 biorxiv.org/content/10.648…Image
This is the scenario I described years ago: accelerated CD8 aging/paralysis/exhaustion/senescence, poorer control of pathogens.

We ignored it at our peril. Rising "mystery" infections, cancers, herpes flares? Not a coincidence
3/5 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 1
This BMJ highlight on movement from "immunity debt" to COVID's direct role in immune harm is a welcome shift

The evidence on T cell dysregulation driving secondary risks has been mounting and it's good to see mainstream outlets engaging it seriously
1/ Image
Image
In 2020 I argued against "debt", emphasizing Covid's lymphomanipulative pathways (T cell apoptosis, exhaustion, aging) causing immune harm

This drew massive ire
Labeled "crank"/"fraud," threats of op-eds pressuring labs, and a rescinded postdoc

I sacrificed hugely for candor
2/ Image
Detractors confidently pushed alternate explanations and villified me back then

now, as data aligns with booming opportunistics, they're silent. no acknowledgment, no "perhaps we were harsh."
3/ Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 5, 2025
In 2020 I wrote a paper claiming the lymphopenia in Covid included Apoptosis, or T cell death

I made this "extreme" claim after reading the 1st paper on Covid's clinical course

Now, a paper claims ongoing T cell death is shaping population immunity
1/ link.springer.com/article/10.118…
Here they start by suggesting the immune system is aging from covid and that aged immune systems are vulnerable

In 2020 I projected that if reinfections would occur, then we would be left with population-level prematurely aged immune systems
2/ Image
Image
Their meta-analysis concludes Covid is causing sustained T cell death

There is an alternative hypothesis that reverses causality, but it is ridiculous

However, I claimed in 2020 immune harm from covid would ↑ susceptibility to a sera-evading variant
3/ Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 22, 2024
@Bryce_Nickels This is absolutely false because he made a “noble lie” and said the N 95s would not work for the public to the public in order for there to be greater supply to healthcare workers only. This backfired.
@Bryce_Nickels The ethical approach was the truth. This is a similar noble lie by omission that the WHO made when they refused to declare Covid as airborne in order for impoverished health systems to provide “adequate” PPE per their regulations according to WHO standards
@Bryce_Nickels The end result was workers in impoverished systems were being given “adequate “PPE for droplet transmission, and many of them died, including sadly many in New York City.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 6, 2024
When will H5N1 will go Human to Human?
Which is deadlier?
"The Covid pandemic has prepared me for an H5N1 pandemic"
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(