HOW SOCIAL TRUST IS ERODED - A VISIT TO INDIA 🇮🇳

🧵 A few years ago now I spent some time in India. One of the more lasting impressions I have from that period was the degree to which the low trust environment there (of a kind) wore me down mentally and transformed my attitude towards public spaces from a by disposition fairly ‘high trust’ person to being much more cynical and constantly on guard - ie being ‘low trust’. Over the space of the first month or so, because of the environment, experiencing real psychogenic anguish at the mental transition from being basically well meaning and otherwise liberal to irritable, combative and developing (experience-informed) prejudices.

My assumptions about how easily you can sustain ‘high levels of social trust’ were shredded. Many people take for granted that high levels of social trust can be upheld without excessive coercion on a sort of naive libertarian basis of most people naturally being ‘fairly decent’ and so behaving ‘fairly decently’. Though I’d encountered this ‘low trust’ behaviour in a many other countries it was in india, because of how common and obtrusive it was, that it became impossible to avoid internalising that a lot of people are not in fact ‘fairly decent’ and that if enough not ‘fairly decent’ people get together they can easily despoil social environments.

Let me give you some examples of the kinds of behaviours you would encounter in India and then explain how prolonged exposure to those behaviours changes you. Granted you are a ‘Mleccha’, a ‘Gora’, (Foreigner, White Man) so qualifier you are treated differently but you still encounter these attitudes appreciably more than you would in many other countries. They do not of course represent the attitude of every Indian (I am an amateur Indologist I love India don’t @ me) but it evidences a certain ‘dog eat dog’ ‘tragedy of the commons’ mindset on the part of a part of the population that results in very appreciable low society wide social trust, at least over certain behaviours. (Others may be more policed eg social roles.) (Incidentally I think this mentality is one of the principal causes for many of India’s systemic problems but that is a separate topic.)

• Take a tuk-tuk or taxi. Driver pretends his meter is broken, quotes price ten times more than actual price. Doesn’t have any change, doesn’t have a card machine. Starts arguing with you when you say you are not giving them more money they should have the change. Sometimes will plead for large tip even if you pay them more than the actual price too. To combat this you have to be prepared to argue with the driver every time you take a taxi (start ‘fights’) and bring small change with you everywhere

• Taking the Mumbai Metro with a woman (naively), metro is incredibly crowded. Man uses crowd as an excuse to press himself up against the woman, starts masturbating. Woman screams, starts to have panic attack - but crowd doesn’t really react. She runs out crying at next metro stop

• Walking around on streets - lots of beggars approach you, often old women, young children, people with some kind of disfigurement, hijra etc. Sometimes they aggressively grab your wrist, your clothes, tug at your shirt and refuse to let go. Often will follow you for a while even if you tell them to go away

[1/2]Image
• Personal space is frequently invaded, no concept of queuing, people try to push past you even in formal settings like airport security or banks. Often will not even make eye contact when doing so, just push into you and try to push past you. Every time you queue you have to be prepared to physically push back against people to keep your space. Some people will get angry when you push back against you even though they pushed you first too

• Try to make purchase with a card, vendor says price is X. Tells you to put card into card machine and pay, tries to cover card machine but you can still see the screen. Has put in price six times as much as quoted. Say to him “this isn’t the price you told us, why have you made it more expensive?” “Oh sorry sorry accident sorry”

• Casual dropping of litter, waste. Spitting, honking constantly, noise, smell everywhere often. Cars swerving around the road, people lying in street etc. - very diminished conception of the public space. In many places going outside is a Live Action Player VS Player experience where you always need to be on guard. Can be exhausting, draining

Your first exposure to these kinds of behaviours, if you’re a basically well-meaning and polite person, you will tend to take them in good faith and respond politely, give people the benefit of the doubt. You take people at face value, maybe even try to help them in a modest way if you can. It can get a little tiresome but you afford people basic ‘human dignity’ and aren’t unduly rude to them. But then it happens again. And again. And again. And again and again and again. The people are rude to you, they don’t reciprocate, they don’t say thank you, they lie to your face, they push and shove and grab you, they try to scam you and then have the temerity to become angry with you when you tell them they are behaving badly.

As well-meaning as you might have originally been, you have so many of these low quality interactions that very quickly you start to frequently lose your patience - everybody you encounter annoys you. The relentlessness makes you start to just want to tell people to fuck off. Sometimes you do tell people to fuck off. You go into each encounter with your guard up, expecting a fight. Your mental priors start to adapt to the environment out of necessity - but as a learnt disposition, it starts to drag on you, tire you out. The environment is exhausting, you’ve come to expect everybody around you is trying to scam you in some way. Very occasionally, you might encounter someone who is actually sincere but your expectations are so low that you are pre-emptively rude to them. You yourself are now a part of the problem because you’re perpetuating the low trust environment. “Why so rude, what’s your problem?” “I’ve been made into this, the environment did this to me, I don’t have the energy to meet everyone in good faith. Statistically, I would be stupid if I did.”

I assume if you spend long enough in this kind of environment it ‘does a number’ on you mentally. You become permanently wired to expect people to exhibit low trust ‘third worldist’ behaviours towards you and often you in turn exhibit it towards others. Not even necessarily out of malice, just because you have to act similarly to not in turn be exploited yourself. Countries that have a reputation for being ‘scammers’ will often by disposition be like that because of the low trust environment in their country, those attitudes emerge out of it.

It has been said that high trust environments are quite rare historically. For a high trust environment to transition to a low trust environment all it often requires is for a relatively small group of people to begin behaving in a low trust manner and then for their low trust behaviour to not be policed. Eventually the rest of the society must mentally adapt to that low trust behaviour - ie become itself low trust - in order to not become victims of it.

[2/2]Image
ADDENDUM: Already received my first death wish from an Indian X User for this post on the grounds that ‘some of these behaviours are made up and don’t happen’ (reprehensibly delusional denialism and very conceited - this is all my own experience) but this post is not intended as an attack, just a respectfully descriptive personal anecdote. Probably there will be more such attacks on similar grounds. Lots of unpleasant and spiteful people and factions online, exhausting to be in shared social environments with them but their behaviour does go some way towards demonstrating how these ‘low trust’ environments are created. QED

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ɖʀʊӄքǟ ӄʊռʟɛʏ 🇧🇹🇹🇩

ɖʀʊӄքǟ ӄʊռʟɛʏ 🇧🇹🇹🇩 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kunley_drukpa

Feb 26
TOP TEN YOOKAY PERSONALITIES

Modern Britain AKA ‘The Yookay’ is home to many colourful characters. Social Media has allowed lots of these figures to bypass traditional media channels and rise to fame off the back of online followings. Here are ten of the most interesting 🧵 Image
AKHMED YAKOOB

Lawyer famous for his popular social media reels and attempts to enter British Politics in aid of Gaza. As a lawyer, he is known for dubious defences of questionable clients including terrorists. His motto is “There is a defence for every offence - remember that!” Image
SLIIME

A Bengali rapper repping Bengalis in the British rap scene - who were previously underrepresented and criticised for having ‘gay and lame’ lyrics. Sliime’s raps include lyrics about how his high BMI body type is a result of generational trauma caused by the Bengal Famine Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 11
THE YOOKAY AS ART

A short collection of photographs of Modern Britain AKA ‘The Yookay’ which have some artistic merit or which best capture the changing nature of Britain - of the process of ‘Yookayfication’ 🧵 Image
Scheduled Departures Image
The Swan Snatchers Image
Read 29 tweets
Feb 10
THIRD WORLDISMS - A GUIDE

A Masterthread of posts about ‘Third Worldisms’ - Behaviours or Customs typically seen in the Third World that in recent years are becoming increasingly common in the First World because of both migration trends and declining social trust 🧵 Image
CHANGING PUBLIC NOISE LEVELS - Different cultures may have different expectations about appropriate public noise levels, what level of eg speakerphone noise intrudes into the private space etc, which can produce a culture clash
LITTER EVERYWHERE - Maybe the most obvious material signifier of creeping thirdworldification, evidences a real decline in social trust (for whichever reasons) and increased public apathy towards the shared public space
Read 21 tweets
Feb 6
‘YOOKAYIFICATION’ - THE NATURE OF CHANGE IN MODERN BRITAIN

🧵 What is ‘Yookayification’? This is the process of change under which Britain transforms aesthetically, culturally and demographically into its (possible) successor state ‘The Yookay’ - that is, a Britain so heavily influenced by the effects of mass immigration that it makes a kind of sense to consider it a distinct political and cultural entity to the Historical Britain.

What does this transformation look like in practice? For example - a town whose demographics experience near total turn-over in the space of several decades, the interpolation of new cultural forms or vocabulary into the culture or language (ie influences from Urdu, Bengali, Arabic, Yoruba, Somali, the West Indies etc.), the normalisation of different kinds of and standards for behaviour that depart from historical customs etc. etc. This is not to make a value judgement about the nature of the transformation, more instead to describe how this kind of nation re-defining change happens at scale over longer stretches of time under the duress of a critical mass of ‘foreign influence’ so introduced into already existing communities. What you could expect to see as a part of a real life process is a patchwork of ‘Yookayification’ across Britain as immigration continues to unfold - some places that have already been transformed into something else entirely because that is where earlier waves of immigration moved into, other places which are more familiar holdouts of the historical Britain. Large cities the first to experience the changes, then a ‘spreading out’ of that change to the centralised organs of culture (the media, politics etc.) and physically to larger towns, then to villages and rural areas. In many places initially a Bosnia, Malaysia, South Africa, Lebanon etc. type parallel communities living arrangement between groups - but over time the changes becoming more thorough and entrenched nationally until they become so established they constitute a settled fact. There is a historical precedent for this in British History - the Roman and Saxon Invasions and the Celtic and Brittonic Holdouts. Wales, Scotland, Ireland, their languages and cultures representing the pre-Saxon Britain which for centuries ‘held out’ against England before being eventually absorbed into it. At some indeterminate point in the future after the mass movements of people, a final consolidation and the older polities and cultures can no longer be said to properly exist in the same way that they used to.

But this is how cultural change will often happen historically. It is true that there is both a certain artificiality and a lack of world historical precedent for the kind of movement of peoples that Britain and the Western World are now experiencing - in the diversity of those peoples, the scale of the migration, how alien the groups are to the historical norms of the countries they migrate to - but the model for how change is affected is historically very familiar. That is, large movements of people catalysing monumental cultural resets. The Ottomans into the Byzantine Empire and the Balkans, the Pax Hellenica and Pax Romana, the Great Migrations at the Fall of Rome, the Saxons into Sub-Roman Britain, the Kushans, the Ghazanvids, the Mughals into India, the Europeans into the Americas, Oceania and Africa, Brazilification, the Russification of Eurasia and Siberia, the Turkic Tribes into Iranian Central Asia (Turkification), the Sinicization of the Middle Kingdom Periphery, Arab traders into Indonesia and Malaysia, below the Sahel, the Sea People, the Hyksos in Egypt, Hurrians and Gutians into Mesopotamia, the Bantu Expansions, the Indo-European Expansions - and so on. These are all examples of world historical movements - or invasions - of people that brought sweeping changes to the places and cultures they arrived in. This is the kind of scale to understand ‘Yookayification’ at.

[1/3]Image
Old cultural forms and groups dissolved and disintegrated and then recombined and synthesised into those incoming forms and groups, new types and expressions of civilisation created. A jarring and disjointing sense of uncanny valley as non sequitur new cultural forms wear the skinsuits of historical forms. Sometimes there is a greater deal of continuity between those historical forms and groups, the changes are less pronounced and disorientating, other times less so. It is true again there are further unique features of the ongoing mass movement of peoples into Britain which make it distinct from other historical mass movements of people listed above - its being into a state with a strong centralised government, the existence of mass media and the internet, the global ubiquity and prominence of the English language, the far-reaching effects of American culture dominance etc. - but there are many more features which are still importantly comparable to these historical examples.

About Timescales - Past a certain historical juncture descriptive claims about this once emerging new country in which its once emerging new features are decried as for example ‘woke’ or ‘alien’ lose much of their punch. To wit, if you have a polity that in the space of a century has become 50% immigrant-descended then describing those immigrants as members of that polity or at least as existing in that polity isn’t ‘woke’ or even ‘assimilationist’ - it’s merely descriptive. You can have a state with world historical levels of eclecticism that is consolidated and established enough that its existence is a ‘mere fact’. That is, its cultural expressions and representations of itself represent a ‘mere fact about the world’. Describing Ottoman Constantinople as Ottoman in the 16th Century isn’t ‘woke’.

How long does it take for this kind of change to become historical fact? For it not to be a merely contingent and reversible state of affairs? A few decades? A century? Two centuries? A millennia? This is the Sorites Paradox of Identity, what Identity is by its nature. It can mean such and such, it might have always have meant such and such (at least for as long as people can remember) but then enough historical contingencies accumulate until it suddenly can’t really be said to mean such and such at all and now means something else entirely. English might have used to mean English but because of the series of events X, Y and Z it no longer means English in quite the same way. The old conception of identity becomes historical, no longer living. But then perhaps it gets revived, like Hebrew, Bulgarian, Polish, Serbian, Greek. But more likely, probably it does not. It depends how much the people left around who still care about it - who will be fewer and fewer in number the further away they are in history from the change - ‘want’ it.

A few hundred years from now, after centuries of hypothetical ‘Yookayification’, perhaps there is a hypothetical revivalist national movement - but it will look less and less like the thing it is trying to revive the more distant from the present it is. Sometimes in History, these Independence Movements have succeeded. Many other times they have not. To contextualise this - Does it make sense to push for a Brittonic Nationalism Revival? We could say we want to (nebulously) return to ‘before’ the Saxons arrived. “Saxons are an alien host on our people.” Maybe this makes a certain kind of very performative sense in Wales but even there it would be a type of ‘larping’ - it is even more farfetched to imagine returning to a ‘pre-Saxon’ England. ‘Saxon-ness’ is culturally and genetically interwoven with the English people. You can’t expunge the one third ‘Saxon-ness’ from your DNA. ‘Saxon-ness’ in the English people is a settled historical fact.

[2/3]Image
Image
Image
Image
Or in America, imagine a hypothetical revivalist movement - “we want to return to being a WASP country”. This might have made more sense before the arrival of the Ellis Island Cohort or even in the decades following their arrival but the arrival event has now receded far enough into the past that it seems unlikely that ‘a certain idea of America’ as an ‘Anglo-Saxon Nation’ will ever return. Not just because it is implausible that you could ever remove ‘non-Anglo’ ancestry Americans from America, but also because there is a critical mass of settled ‘non-Anglo’ groups and enough ‘Anglos’ intermarried with those groups that the idea is nonsensical to entertain. Quite aside from almost nobody wanting it. Many in the Hart-Cellar Cohort have in the main reached this point too. The mixing and acculturation process already happened, it is a settled fact.

Which is more ‘Roman’ - 15th Century Byzantium or 15th Century Italy? Byzantium with its influx of Avars, Bulgars and Turks or Italy with its influx of Ostrogoths, Lombards and Normans? Byzantium was a more direct political continuation but Italy was a more direct genetic and geographic continuation - and at the start of the Renaissance in some ways a more direct cultural continuation too. Does it even make sense to speak of ‘Roman-ness’ in this way? At some point in history Rome was ‘Roman’ and then at some indeterminate point afterwards Rome was no longer ‘Roman’, or at least no longer ‘Roman’ in the way we usually mean by ‘Roman’. No civilisation is static but there are degrees and magnitudes of change and continuity. We recognise 15th century England as an expression of the same polity and culture and people as 20th century England, but we do not recognise 20th Century Turkey as a continuation of 15th century Byzantium even if some of the ancestors of those Byzantines were nominally Turkish citizens.

This is all to say that over time, old contingencies become increasing ‘baked-in’. Counterfactuals recede into the past. New aesthetics which were once jarring and disjointing and disorienting, perhaps even pointedly emotionally-laden, become less and less so and more and more quotidian. None of these changes are in the strictest sense ever wholly irreversible, but over time reversals become much more of a motivated exertion.

[3/3]Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
PICTURE THREAD TOUR OF DAMASCUS, SYRIA 🇸🇾

Thread of pictures I took around parts of Damascus during the Syrian Civil War just before the fall of Assad. There were lots of obvious signs of dysfunction and tension - but lots of signs of normalcy too despite the ongoing war 🧵 Image
The central Damascus bazaar, the Al-Hamidiyah Souq, tastefully festooned with Assad bunting. The souq is one of the ‘Great Bazaars’ of the Middle East, like Istanbul or Cairo. Always very busy during the day. Got told it was a ‘tourist trap’ even though Syria then had no tourists Image
A street just off the main souq. Again, Assad imagery displayed prominently. Bazaar full of hustle and bustle - merchants yell at you “for you my friend good price.” Some litter on floor but the Damascus litter situation was not egregiously bad. Far worse in other parts of Syria Image
Read 26 tweets
Jan 16
PICTURE THREAD TOUR OF LUTON, UK 🇬🇧

I recently visited Luton - a working class town near London infamously home to both the Tate Brothers and Tommy Robinson and one of the towns in Britain most transformed by immigration - to see what it looks like today 🧵 Image
Luton was one of the towns earliest effected by large scale immigration. It’s against this background that Robinson’s EDL first emerged, the working class living on the frontlines of a changing Britain. My TLDR impression of Luton is that this change has now largely happened Image
In some ways Luton might as well be another country. It’s easy to look at pictures of foreign-coded visuals in your own country and say, “oh it’s from a ghetto, China Town, Little India etc it’s always been like that.” Luton is like if these areas expanded over an entire city Image
Read 34 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(