What are the rules when women who identify as men access male changing rooms?
TRUE STORY! 🧵
Summer 2023: a woman in a bikini walks through the men’s changing rooms at a local authority swimming pool run by Kirklees Active Leisure (KAL) @activeleisure
After her swim, the bikini-clad female went back to the male changing area to get dressed.
A man in the changing room tells us he was shocked, uncomfortable and worried.
But, when he reported it to the staff on reception, they told him they knew about her, had received complaints, but as she ‘identifies as a man’ she was entitled to use the men’s facilities.
Of course, we know that’s not the case … 1/ 6
On further investigation, by the man’s wife, it emerged that Kirklees Active Leisure’s swimming pool policy allows males and females to use the changing room that is 'relevant to the gender with which they identify'.
In other words, the changing rooms are mixed-sex.
She asked KAL if she would be safe on their premises if men could identify as women and access the female changing room.
She asked why there were no single-sex changing rooms?
2/6
Even after a lengthy series of emails and following @activeleisure’s complaints procedure the woman is still no closer to knowing whether she is safe in the swimming pool changing rooms.
KAL have plenty of answers, but none of them make any sense, and none of them comply with safeguarding procedure as we know it.
KAL says its policies are ‘fully in line with current guidance’ and they have ‘a robust approach to safeguarding’ through ‘associated processes… to protect children and vulnerable adults’.
In fact, KAL had NO policies in place, NO risk assessments and were effectively making up policy on the hoof. 3/ 6
Over the past 18 months, it has emerged that KAL:
· had no evidence of a policy document stating who can access the male or female changing rooms.
· had no evidence of a policy on safeguarding.
· missed the part where EHRC guidance on single sex facilities states that: “The Equality Act allows for the provision of separate or single sex services in certain circumstances under ‘exceptions’ relating to sex”.
· showed zero regard for customers who do not consent to mixed-sex changing areas.
· are apparently keeping their fingers crossed that a sexual offence doesn’t occur in their changing rooms.
4/6
In a Stage 3 complaint response, KAL finally addressed the concerns raised.
· KAL said it has received ‘expert legal advice’ and Inclusive Employers have given their ‘consideration’ to the mixed-sex changing room policy.
· Women’s concerns about safety, dignity and discomfort are ‘taken into account’, [but it’s clearly more important to prioritise identity].
· KAL dismissed the references to guidance supplied by Akua Reindorf KC, which examines a local council’s acting unlawfully by refusing to protect women’s single-sex services.
· KAL now say that the relevant facilities are accessed on ‘a case-by-case’ basis.
5/6
Internal complaints procedures are often time-consuming and Kafkaesque, but thanks to the hard work of one persistent woman, there are now receipts and some insight into the process that led to the woman in a bikini waltzing through the male changing area.
WRN recommends that @activeleisure look again at the very good points raised in this complaints process.
And a word of advice: dismissing the opinion of @akuareindorf is a big mistake.
Big.
Huge.
Our WRN Leisure Centre report revealed the lack of single-sex provision in UK swimming pools all over the nation.
On Tuesday, we had the privilege of attending an event organised by the wonderful women of @WRNScotland at Holyrood, sponsored by the indomitable @TessWhite4NE.
This focused on the importance of safeguarding women’s rights in Scotland’s public services.
1/6 🧵
WRN Scotland launched their hard-hitting report into rapes and sexual assaults in Scottish hospitals.
It was pleasing to see that so many MSPs and other concerned women and men attended.
What happened when women from WRN attended the ASP Police and Crime panel? Spoiler alert - nothing good. 1/4
It's not just strip searching. We were told @ASPolice maintain single sex facilities for female officers as well as gender neutral options and that no woman would be forced to share with a man. Trouble is the ASP Transgender policy says any man can declare himself female or non-binary and access the single sex spaces and we were also told that the policy had not changed. The two things cannot both be true unless of course you believe men can be female. 2/4 womensrights.network/post/avon-and-…
Despite the previous PCC @ShelfordMark meeting with WRN representatives and promising to include us in any future consultations, the current PCC and Chief Constable did not bother to consult with any groups outside of the force. Putting extra dressing on your word salad at the Police and Crime panel is not a substitute for democratic engagement. WRN will continue to hold @AandSPCC and @aspsarah_crew to account until we get assurance that @ASPolice will prioritise the dignity, privacy and safety of women and girls. 3/4
Our National Policing Lead for WRN, Cathy Larkman, explains just how invasive a strip search can be on GB News (link in next post) and why it should always be carried out by an officer of the same sex. Regardless of 'legal sex' a man with a £5 Gender Recognition Certificate is still a man and access to women in a state of undress is not a human right nor a mental health treatment for gender dysphoric men.
1/4
Incredibly, @PeterTatchell suggested the solution to this problem is to have more than one officer present and to record it on CCTV - you would only suggest this if you wanted to make the experience even more traumatic. We saw what happened with shared footage amongst officers after the terrible murder of sisters Nicole Smallman and Bibaa Henry. How could any woman ever feel confident that footage of her strip search was not being shared. 2/4
Maintaining a rule of same sex searches is the only legal and sane option as we made clear in our reports on this issue. Advice which now appears to have been dismissed by the @PoliceChiefs who prioritise the legal fiction of a GRC over biological reality. It seems NPCC no longer care about retaining the trust and confidence of women. You can find the full reports here. womensrights.network/wrn-police-rep…
3/4
Two stories stood out in yesterday's headlines. Luis Rubiales found guilty of sexual assault after kissing Jenni Hermoso at the World Cup final and the tragic death of Jaysley Beck, a 19 year old soldier following a sexual assault and a sustained campaign of harassment. 1/4
We are pleased that the actions of Rubiales have been recognised as sexual assault. Hermoso said of Rubiales ‘he tainted one of the happiest days of my life.’ Rubiales response in the aftermath of this was an example of how powerful men try to denigrate the women who call out their behaviour. Even though the world witnessed the assault he still tried to claim it was consensual. 2/4 news.sky.com/story/luis-rub…
Jaysley Beck, a young soldier, also reported sexual assault by her Sergeant Major after he tried to pin her down and kiss her at a work event. In her case she was pressured to drop the allegations, told it would ruin his career and then key details were omitted from the report meaning her attacker faced only a minor sanction. In addition Jaysley was being subjected to relentless harassment from her own line manager with thousands of text messages over the space of a few weeks. 3/4 bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
Draping this flag on the altar or flying it above our churches and other places of worship is not a symbol of inclusivity. Where we seek to bring people and communities together this flag sows division. It tells the congregation that only those who believe in the new creed of genderism are welcome here.
1/8
This is far from the first time the church has been embroiled in such controversy. We agree with Rev Dr Ian Paul that 'this is not inclusive, but exclusive - it excludes people who do not accept the false claim of gender ideology.' 2/8 telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/1…
We have been concerned about the impact of this ideology within the church for some time now. As Claire Loneragan says in this article
'For more than 2,000 years the church knew exactly which sex could not be ordained. But now that women are being treated equally (in principle, at least), the church is fully accepting of “male women” to the point of sanctifying them.' 3/8 womensrights.network/post/the-queer…
EXCLUSIVE! Women's Rights Network has learnt of a shocking increase in mobile phone use to capture indecent images of girls using mixed-sex changing rooms at Swim England competitions.
A report from Swim England on safeguarding failures in swimming pools involving the capture of photos or videos on mobile phones from under or over a cubicle partition has been leaked to WRN 🧵/1
In January alone, SEVEN cases of this criminal behaviour were reported to Swim England, a massive monthly increase on 2024 when 43 cases, less than four per month, were reported. The explosive revelations emerged at an Extra-Ordinary meeting of Swim England welfare officers, convened at short notice.
The report makes clear that this is not a ‘gender neutral’ crime – girls are the victims in the vast majority of these cases. 🧵/2
All cases reported in 2025 so far have occurred in swimming competitions. One victim said: "I am really scared, what if there are pictures of my naked body on the internet now for everyone to see?"
Based on comments from clubs, it is likely that this is an under-reported crime. Most shockingly, one responsible person was quoted as saying this is a ‘low level concern’. 🧵/3