Mohammedans often falsely take credit for the invention of Algebra & Algorithm crediting them to Al-Khwarizmi.
However both Algorithm & algebra has been used and developed in Indian(Hindu) mathematics over the ages much before Islam was born which was later translated by Al khwarizmi.
Islamic golden age of science & maths started when Al Mamun of Baghdad invited Indian astronomers & mathematicians to its court and got many Hindu mathematic treatises translated. Al Khwarizmi also served in Mamun’s court as a translator of Indian mathematics.
His own books were directly named Kitab al-Hisab al Hindi (which translates to book of Indian mathematics) & Zij-al Sind hind (translation:Astronomy table from India.
ALGORITHM:
The word “Algorithm” got its name from the latinised version of Al Khwarizmi work named “Algoritmi de numero Indorum”
Guess what the name means.
“Al-Khwarizmi on the Indian Numbers”
Earlier it was known to academics and translators that Al Khwarizmi’s works are nothing but translations from Indian mathematics until Mohamedans started plagiarising it as their own invention.
Sulbasütras are part of kalpasutras, which are one of the six Vedängas. These are essentially manuals for geometrical constructions of Vedic altars. Baudhayana, Äpastamba, Katyayana etc. are some of the Sulbasütras.
Algorithm has been part of these ancient Sulvasutras from Vedic time, then advanced in medieval mathematics of Kerala school.
Algorithms were invented by Indians to make, fire altars in astronomy & many other reasons.
Some evidence of geometrical algorithms in the Apastamba Sulbasütra much before Al khwarizmi was born.
Not just Al khwarizmi, Mohamedan religion itself wasnt born when katyayana Sulbasutra formulated its algorithm.
The first clear enunciation of the cube root algorithm is found in Aryabhatiya by Renowned mathematician Aryabhata:
Kuṭṭaka is an algorithm for finding integer solutions of linear Diophantine equations. The algorithm was originally invented by the Indian astronomer-mathematician Āryabhaṭa.
They are important in astronomy also, for instance, in the calculation of Ahargana (the number of days elapsed from a given epoch) from the mean longitudes of planets.
The above shows India's advancement in Astronomy & algorithm being an important factor to achieve it.
Coming to Astronomy, In the book Al Beruni's India, Sachau writes how Indians went to Baghdad with books like Brahmasiddhanta & the first time Arabs became acquainted with astronomy because of Indians.
So how did India advance so much in Astronomy without knowing the algorithm?
Maths is not mathing here. Lol
My previous thread on how Al khwarizmi plagiased Algebra from Indians.
🧵Romila Thapar says Omitting Mughals from textbooks is “nonsense.”
Did you know?
There was a scandal in ICHR where a historian's manuscript vanished & later found plagiarised by someone in ICHR itself.
The historian died without recieving recognition & royalty for his work.
This is the same ICHR which chose Romila Thapar as its council 4 times.
Apparently omitting "Mughals" from textbook is Nonsense but omitting credit & Royalty of another Historian who wasn't part of the Marxist ecosystem isn't.
In the 1970s, historian Dr. Parmatma Saran submitted an English translation of Tarikh-i-Akbari to the ICHR under an approved project.
ICHR’s own Annual Reports (1976–77, 1977–78) explicitly list the manuscript as received and completed.
Years later, when questions were raised about publication, ICHR suddenly claimed the manuscript was “not traceable.”
Dr. Saran died without seeing his work published, credited, or paid for.
Hilarious empty rhetoric! U didn't even research primary sources by British themselves
Myth 1: The British provided better education by dismantling Gurukuls.
Fact: 1. Surveys done by the British themselves shows the Indian method of studies in its indigenous schools was superior to the British during the colonial regime.
2. In Contemporary England during the colonial regime there were hardly any thorough studies except in religious spheres.
3. The average period of schooling was hardly 1-2 years.
4. In fact it was the Indian method of studies that actually helped the introduction of popular education in England that existed in India for centuries.
5. In some country schools of England, writing was excluded for fear of evil consequences.
6. The British only wanted to replace Indian schools with their own so that they could uproot indian civilization to bring people to an institutionalised, formal, law-abiding Christianity.
Myth 2: The British built Indians the first true universities
Fact: Vedic universities like Nalanda, Vikramshila, Takshashila, Odantpuri were not only highly formalised, they were famous all over the world & many foreigners used to come to study there.
Myth 3: Indians were able to discover Indus valley due to John Marshall
Fact: It was actually a Hindu Brahmin Rakhaldas Banerjee who first discovered IVC. Marshall got him shifted to snatch the entire credit.
Myth 4: British standardised Indian dialects and Grammar.
Fact: Heard about Panini? He had formalised Sanskrit Grammar in such a superior way that British themselves used to think not learning Sanskrit scriptures will be a dis-service to themselves.
William Jones:
"Sanskrit is of wonderful structure more perfect & refined than Greek or latin"
Modiji: Macaulay ne Bharat ko apne jad se ukhadne ke beej boye the (through English education system)
Ruchika: That never happened.
Macaulay: Clown Ruchika, i exactly said that.
No Hindoo who has ever received an English education ever remains sincerely attached to his religion. Some profess themselves as pure deist, some embrace Christianity. It is my firm belief that if our plan of education are followed up, there will not be a single idolater among the respectable classes.
And this will be effected without any efforts to proselytize.
Modiji has more knowledge in History than this self proclaimed Historian. What Macaulay wanted to achieve is evident in illiterate like Ruchika who has no knowledge of history & no sense of her roots.
Her entire video is not based on any primary sources but from writings of British stooges like Phule & Ramabai.
Let's debunk her lies.
Ruchika's claim :
Education was only limited to upper castes
Fact check:
Surveys done by the British themselves debunk this lie as Shudra scholars were the highest in number amongst Hindus.
He erased half the planet because he can’t read a history book😂
Here's you history lesson about Existence of India before British came to loot us.
GREEK SOURCES:
1. Greek ambassador Megasthenes wrote about India in the 3rd century BCE before your Christ was born.
Here's a Map as per the description of Megasthenes.
2. Greco-Roman astronomer Ptolemy mentioned the country as India clearly in the 2nd century CE.