🧵 ICE targeting Palestinians is nothing new — it adopted its tactics tested through israel’s oppression of Palestinians. From training with israeli occupation forces to deploying israeli surveillance tech, U.S. border violence is deeply tied to zionist colonialism. Here’s how ⬇️
After 9/11, the U.S. launched its so-called “War on Terror,” expanding surveillance, policing, and militarization. Agencies like ICE and DHS emerged with a clear target: immigrant communities. But their strategies & technologies were imported from israel.
Students are directly impacted. israeli companies like Elbit Systems profit from contracts with U.S. universities, providing surveillance technologies used to spy on U.S. student protests and activism — targeting those who speak out for Palestine.
➡️ truthout.org/articles/campu…
Students mobilizing for Palestine have faced surveillance, intimidation, academic repression, and now even detention & deportation. These tactics mirror how Palestinian youth are criminalized under occupation
➡️ theintercept.com/2025/02/06/bet…
The U.S. has long viewed israel as a model for militarized security. DHS agents routinely visit the zionist state for counterterrorism training, learning tactics the IDF has perfected through its brutal occupation of Palestinians.
➡️ aljazeera.com/news/2020/6/12…
One example: The GILEE program (Georgia International Law Enforcement Exchange) sends U.S. law enforcement—including ICE agents—to train with occupation forces. They learn surveillance techniques, interrogation methods, and crowd control strategies.
➡️ therealnews.com/deadly-exchang…
Israeli defense companies, many profiting from surveillance technology used against Palestinians, sell their tools to ICE and DHS. For example, Elbit Systems, which built Israel’s apartheid wall, secured contracts to militarize the U.S.-Mexico border.
➡️ prismreports.org/2024/07/22/elb…
Elbit’s towers—first tested on Palestinians—now loom over Indigenous lands in Arizona, equipped with sensors and cameras to detect human movement. The U.S. border has become an extension of Israel’s occupation tactics.
➡️ popularmechanics.com/technology/sec…
The partnership also extends to information-sharing. The U.S. and israel coordinate intelligence gathering, and zionist companies are embedded in U.S. surveillance infrastructure. Palestinians and immigrants alike are treated as security threats.
➡️ aljazeera.com/news/2020/6/12…
These collaborations reinforce systems of displacement and control. Palestinian refugees forced from their lands, and migrant families torn apart by ICE raids, are victims of the same militarized logic. Palestinians refugees doubly face this as they are targeted by ICE.
The violence Palestinians face in Hebron & Jenin echo the surveillance, checkpoints, and brutality that immigrant communities endure across the U.S. The struggles are linked—and the fight against colonialism must confront these global networks of repression.
U.S. tax dollars fund the displacement of Palestinians abroad and the criminalization of immigrants at home—all while israeli companies profit. It’s not security; it’s colonial control. No to ICE. No to the IDF. No to militarized borders—sanctuary cities & campuses for ALL!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) officially published a statement in Arabic, confirming that No Other Land violates anti-normalization standards. This vindicates what many of us have been saying. bdsmovement.net/ar/PACBI-NoOth…x.com/nerdeenkiswani…
Palestinians are calling for a boycott of the film, recognizing that despite its portrayal of israeli crimes, it ultimately operates within a normalization framework that undermines our struggle.
The statement clarifies that the film was partially funded by Close-Up, a normalization initiative that brings together Palestinian and israeli filmmakers without requiring Israelis to recognize Palestinian rights under international law.
Some people claim that supporting a “pragmatic” two-state solution isn’t Zionism. But let’s be clear: a two-state solution is, by definition, a Zionist position. Even if you justify it for “practicality,” you’re still upholding Zionism. Here’s why: 🧵
First, let’s reject the notion that rejecting a 2SS is delusional because israel already exists. The issue is treating its continued existence as a settler-colonial, apartheid state as inevitable. Just because something exists today doesn’t mean it has a right to exist as it is.
Apartheid South Africa existed. Jim Crow laws existed. That didn’t mean they had to continue. So when people say israel is “very likely” to continue in some form, that’s not a neutral observation, it’s a defeatist argument that justifies maintaining Zionist rule.
The idea that Palestinian and Jewish-israeli “safety and security is intertwined” is a dangerous narrative that continuously justifies Zionism. It is not about justice—it is about maintaining settler colonialism. 🧵
Zionism has always framed itself as a project for Jewish security. But this “security” was built on Palestinian dispossession, ethnic cleansing, and apartheid. Palestinians are not responsible for sustaining a system that oppresses them.
When people say, “both sides deserve safety,” they ignore the reality that Zionist “safety” depends on military rule, siege, and ethnic supremacy. The issue is not “safety for both”—it’s dismantling the structures that create oppression in the first place.
Sorry, but Ukraine is nothing like Palestine. Palestine is a people fighting against settler colonialism. If anything, Ukraine is more like israel—a Western-backed project propped up for geopolitical interests & sustained by empire.
People need to stop forcing comparisons between Ukraine and Palestine. They are not the same struggle, not the same history, and not the same reality. These false parallels only distort the truth and erase the unique brutality of zionist settler colonialism.
This isn’t about the Ukrainian people, I actually feel bad for them. But their leadership, especially Zelensky, sold them out, propped up Azov Nazis, and let the West use Ukraine as a pawn. All to be abandoned in a public humiliation ritual after sacrificing his own people.
“Liberal” Zionists call Kahanists extremists to distract from their own crimes. But the Nakba wasn’t carried out by Kahanists, it was Ben-Gurion’s army. The occupation wasn’t expanded by Betar, it was Labor Zionists. The whole project is built on the same violence.
The ADL talks about Kanist groups like Betar as if it’s an extremist faction, but what’s particularly extreme about being honest? Jabotinsky just admitted what Ben Gurion did in practice. Zionism shares the same foundation, some just prefer euphemisms over blunt force.
Betar isn’t an “extremist” or “right-wing” outlier in Zionism, it’s just consistent. All forms of Zionism, whether Labor, Revisionist, or “leftist,” operate on the same settler-colonial logic: removal, replacement, and domination. The differences are just branding.
Tel Aviv’s club scene is often framed as a ‘beacon of light’—progressive, diverse, and full of life. But in reality, it plays a central role in whitewashing Zionism, making apartheid look like a party. This is precisely why cultural boycott are even more important.
Israeli nightlife markets itself as an escape—carefree raves, queer parties, and techno festivals. But escape from what? The occupation? The fact that Palestinians can’t even enter Tel Aviv without a permit? That these clubs are built on stolen land?
The same scene that hosts ‘inclusive’ drag shows and queer events is built on a system of exclusion. Meanwhile zionist love peddling the lie that ‘gays for Gaza’ would be thrown off of roofs, using queer people to pinkwash ‘Israel as the only democracy in the Middle East.’