Research shows free, affluent societies maximize guilt, shame, and altruism in women. In the West, evermore power is given to an increasingly self-loathing, selfless demographic. 🧵
This insight comes from a recent systematic review on the Gender Equality Paradox. It summarizes 27 meta-analyses and large-scale studies as well as 54 other studies.
“Results indicate that those sex differences in negative emotions that are more prevalent or stronger in females [such as guilt and shame] are larger in countries with higher living conditions (p.20)."
The same is true for altruism (p.14).
The main explanation for this phenomenon is likely gene-environment correlation. rGE in 4 steps:
1. Genetic predispositions can be more fully expressed when environmental constraints are removed.
2. Different innate tendencies lead to creating and selecting different environments.
3. These environmental creations and choices then reinforce initial differences.
4. This creates feedback loops that amplify smaller initial differences.
Wokeness largely arises from unmarried, childless young women creating and self-selecting into psychosocial environments that validate their heightened tendencies toward guilt, shame, and altruism, while offering a channel to fulfill their otherwise unmet nurturing needs.
The only thing worse than pain is meaningless pain. Wokism gave meaning to women’s psychological pain. “I feel guilt, sadness, shame, and anxiety because of the racist and patriarchal society I live in.”
In the US (and likely the anglosphere), young liberal women are the most mentally ill demographic, by a large margin. This is both a cause and a symptom of Wokism.
Guilt, shame, and altruism are the psychological foundations of Wokism.
Tomorrow I will share a new, unifying, biopsychosocial model of Wokism.
Based on new insights gained from interactions on this thread, I will have to modify my new biopsychosocial model of Wokism, which was due to come out today. It should now be released next week. Thank you for your input—it helps me get better.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The First Law of Immigration is that immigrants tend to recreate the conditions they fled, because in some fundamental sense, culture is that which feels good to a group of people and feelings are inherently biological
Research shows free, affluent societies maximize guilt, shame, trust, and altruism in women. Across the West, evermore power is given to an increasingly self-loathing, selfless demographic 🧵
My insight is based on a 2024 systematic review of the Gender-Equality Paradox. It summarizes 27 meta-analyses and large-scale studies, as well as 54 other studies journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17…
“Results indicate that those sex differences in negative emotions that are more prevalent or stronger in females [such as guilt and shame] are larger in countries with higher living conditions (p.20)."
Wokism arises from a population unusually selfless, increasingly led by low-testosterone people, made to believe all groups are psychologically identical, and whose women feel evermore guilt, shame, trust, and unmet nurturing needs 🧵
“Wokism arises from a population unusually selfless”
Suicidal Empathy isn’t merely ideological, it’s more fundamentally biopsychosocial.
Research shows free, affluent societies maximize guilt, shame, trust, and altruism in women🧵
My insight is based on a recent systematic review of the Gender-Equality Paradox. It summarizes 27 meta-analyses and large-scale studies as well as 54 other studies
“Results indicate that those sex differences in negative emotions that are more prevalent or stronger in females [such as guilt and shame] are larger in countries with higher living conditions (p.20)."
Zero-sum thinking is the belief that gains for one individual or group tend to come at the cost of others. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research (2025), U.S. Black and Hispanic people are more likely to hold that belief. Race durably influences political beliefs
Full figure with x-axis
Despite the authors’ best efforts at minimizing the explanatory value of race by controlling for variables that race also predicts, like being born abroad, household income, and educational attainment—a statistical sleight of hand ritualized among social scientists—the authors are stuck with a sizable Black-White gap they resort to explaining with…racism, essentially without further evidence. Can they also tell us how racism makes Asians have lower levels of zero-sum thinking?
It is worth mentioning that “Black respondents are more zero-sum even after controlling for whether their ancestors were enslaved.” p. 6
For social scientists to start publishing honest, consequential research again, a good first step would be not to use the blank slate—a lie—as their foundational premise.
I should add, however, that the authors are probably not to blame here. These are the rules of the social science game. You either sugarcoat racial realities or you don’t get published.
Mamdani comes from a culture where lying is normal.
26,000 people from 60 countries were asked how much they believed they had to be selfish [disregard others, cheat, lie, etc.] to get ahead. Indians scored highest
“The rich are richer than the
poor because they have been more selfish in life than the poor.”
5-point scale from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5)
Source:
This belief is conceptually similar to vulnerable narcissism. In a high-trust, meritocratic society, we could expect a moderately strong positive correlation (~0.45, corrected for unreliability) between the two constructs