1/25: The RAF faces a pilot shortage crisis in 2025—10-15% below needs. Recruitment struggles, retention falters, and demand may rise post-SDR. Issues like Puma’s retirement, E-7 relocation, and diversity scandals deepen the problem. Here’s why the RAF’s pilot gap could widen.
2/25: Pilot recruitment is tough: ages 17.5-23, strong academics (64 UCAS points), and rigorous tests. Training takes 3 yrs—e.g., fast jet pilots go from Cranwell to Valley to Typhoon OCUs. Bottlenecks delay output, with only 30 F-35 pilots qualified by 2022.
3/25: Civilian airlines lure RAF pilots with better pay, schedules, and urban bases. The RAF’s deployments and modest salaries can’t compete. Younger generations also prioritise work-life balance over military service, shrinking the recruit pool.
4/25: Press reports since 2022 reveal illegal positive discrimination in RAF recruitment. To hit 40% female, 20% ethnic minority targets by 2030, white male applicants were sidelined—breaching the Equality Act 2010. A major self-inflicted wound.
5/25: Leaked emails showed recruiters calling white men “useless white male pilots.” In 2020-21, 161 women and ethnic minorities were fast-tracked, delaying 31 white males. Each got £5,000 compensation after a 2023 MoD inquiry confirmed bias.
6/25: Gp Capt. Elizabeth Nicholl quit in 2022, refusing to enact “unlawful” diversity orders. The scandal sparked outrage—rejected applicants felt cheated. Trust in RAF recruitment tanked, likely deterring white men, the traditional recruit base.
7/25: With the UK 87% white, alienating white males—historically most RAF pilots—cut a key demographic. Sources report a “culture of unease” among staff and a hit to morale. Fewer applicants mean fewer pilots at a critical time.
8/25: The 2024 SDR could worsen this. If the lobbyists win and the RAF adds 24 Typhoons (2 squadrons, 24-30 pilots), demand spikes. Training can’t keep up, and diversity fallout may shrink the candidate pool further. A shortfall of 20-25% looms.
9/25: Puma HC2 retires March 31, 2025, with no replacement ready. The New Medium Helicopter (NMH) aims for 36-44 units by late 2020s, but only Leonardo bid by Aug 2024. Contract delays mean a 2-3 yr gap.
10/25: Puma’s exit leaves Chinooks (less versatile) or allies to fill in. This strains rotary-wing pilots and risks UK autonomy. NMH integration will need retraining—tough with a stretched pilot pool post-diversity scandal.
11/25: E-7 Wedgetail moves from Waddington to Lossiemouth, replacing E-3s retired in 2021. Due late 2025, it joins P-8s in Scotland. But aging E-3 crews—many 40s/50s—resist relocating from Lincolnshire’s amenities to remote Moray.
12/25: Older E-3 crews, with families settled near Waddington, may retire or go civilian rather than move. Years of training could be lost, leaving E-7s to greener pilots. Retention takes another hit.
13/25: Fast jet training at RAF Valley, Anglesey, faces similar woes. Hawk T2 prepares Typhoon/F-35 pilots, but its isolation—far from cities, poor links—deters trainees and instructors. Families hate it too.
14/25: Valley’s runway got a 25-yr lifeline in 2017, but personnel reluctance stalls output. Experienced instructors are key, yet many leave due to lifestyle issues. Fewer fast jet pilots result.
15/25: The RAF’s pilot crisis ties back to numbers: 10-15% short now (OF-2 and OF-3).
Recruitment can’t fill gaps, training lags, and retention suffers from basing and diversity missteps. Operational readiness is at risk.
16/25: Post-SDR, a 24-Typhoon buy would need 24-30 pilots—2 squadrons. With current struggles, that’s a tall order. Diversity damage and training delays could push the gap to 20-25%.
17/25: Puma’s gap tests rotary-wing crews. No NMH til late 2020s means overwork or reliance on allies. Retraining for a new platform will stretch a pilot pool already hit by recruitment woes.
18/25: E-7’s Lossiemouth shift could lose veteran E-3 crews. Their expertise is vital for a complex platform, but family concerns trump duty. Younger pilots may not fill the skill void fast enough.
19/25: Valley’s isolation mirrors Lossiemouth: pilots and families balk at remote posts. Fast jet training suffers, slowing Typhoon/F-35 pipelines. The RAF can’t afford this bottleneck.
20/25: Illegal discrimination backfired—fewer applicants, not more diversity. White males, still a majority pool, felt targeted. The RAF shot itself in the foot when it needed bodies most.
21/25: Solutions? Streamline training—cut OCU waits. Boost pay, offer lifestyle perks, and rethink basing. Valley and Lossiemouth need incentives to retain talent
22/25: Diversity must shift to merit-based outreach, not quotas. Legal positive action (tie-breaks) is fine; illegal bias isn’t. Rebuild trust to widen the recruit net.
23/25: Without fixes, the RAF risks capability erosion. SDR demands—like more Typhoons—could expose a hollow force. Pilot shortages threaten UK defence in a tense world.
24/25: The RAF’s crisis isn’t just numbers—it’s structural. Recruitment, retention, and ops transitions collide. Puma, E-7, Valley, and diversity scandals all feed the shortfall.
25/25: Conclusion: The RAF’s pilot gap is dire and growing. Post-SDR, it could cripple readiness. Bold reform is urgent—without it, the skies may lack defenders when needed most.
Views and opinions my own, facts can be challenged. Essay available soon.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
F-35
It seems the lobbyists, bots et al are busy at the moment
1/Let’s debunk the myth that the US has a “kill switch” for the F-35. You’ve probably heard it: the US can remotely disable these jets if an ally steps out of line. Cool story, but it’s not true. Here’s how it actually works—and where the real control lies.
2/ First, the myth: people think the US can flip a switch and shut down an F-35 mid-flight or on the tarmac. It’s a sexy conspiracy—total sci-fi. But there’s no evidence or tech basis for it. So where’d this idea come from? Two words: ALIS and ODIN.
3/ ALIS—Autonomic Logistics Information System is the F-35’s original logistics brain. It tracks the jet’s health: engine stats, stress data, you name it. That info goes to a central server (US-managed) so crews can fix stuff and order parts. It’s a maintenance tool, not a joystick.
1/15: Imagine a defense budget at 3% GDP. Tanks, jets, ships? Old-school. Today’s threats need resilience, cyber defences, sovereign GPS, logistics, and CNI protection. Here’s why we should rethink security for the 21st century.
2/15: Resilience first. Wars aren’t just kinetic—disasters, hacks, and supply shocks can cripple us. 3% GDP could fund emergency systems, decentralised grids, and stockpiles. Adaptability beats firepower when chaos hits.
3/15: Cybersecurity is the new frontline. Colonial Pipeline, Russian hacks—digital attacks paralyse faster than bombs. We need experts, defences, and secure networks, not just more jets. Prevention’s cheaper than recovery.