At Detransition Awareness Day, Forrest Smith describes running away to Portland after dropping out of college and availing himself of a network of homeless youth services that allowed him to reinvent himself as a transgender woman and participate in street political militancy.
During covid he was rushed through for an emergency orchiectomy despite closure of the hospital for elective procedures with the aid of a referral specialist whose job was to manipulate billing codes for gender procedures. Received a letter from a psychiatrist testifying that testicle removal was urgent and lifesaving; eight days later the surgery was done.
When he began to question his transition, no therapist would speak to him, and insurance that paid to remove his testicles while he was homeless and drug addicted would not cover removal of his breast implants.
Smith described fetish porn first encountered as a child at Deviant Art consuming him in a world of squalid obsessions and that gender transition offered the promised of transforming those desires into something clean.
Mirrors the motives of many older AGP’s seeking to launder their paraphilias into a valid identity by propagating a new cohort of child transitioner who can model for the public the cleanliness and innocence they yearn for after allowing their transvestic fetishism to swallow them whole
In an earlier panel, Smith described serving in the role of a confessor to some gender surgeons.
"He went on to tell me 'many of my patients, many of my trans female patients who come in on public insurance are making a mistake.'
And he described being able to count their ribs because he was telling me how emaciated they were, because he was literally operating on homeless people.
And in Portland, some of the situation with the homelessness is the homeless aren't like native Oregonians, right? They're not from Oregon. They are getting shipped there from all over the country.
So these people are totally, totally homeless and destitute -- and then they're being operated on.
And they're having these vaginoplasties, which -- it's hard to call them vaginoplasty, because it's just this gross mutilation.
And so I was talking to a surgeon, and she's showing me picture after picture of patients and -- they're horrible pictures to look at. They're just horrible mutilation.
And that's when her eyes are watering as she's presenting this to me, and she's kind of trying to tell me it might not turn out right.
And at that point, I was also so thoroughly into the identity and the comorbidities. I was struggling with addiction. So I it was during COVID. I was wearing a little mask. I had no eyebrows, wearing a soggy hat. I also was a waif.
And I told her what I had heard from some of my transgender friends.
I said that I realize I am a guinea pig. Because she was telling me, we don't have enough data.
I said, I realize I'm a guinea pig.
And then she told me, 'that's very insightful of you.'"
Stories like this never surprise or phase other detransitioners. They know this world intimately and are totally inured to its normal practices. Neither does it surprise anyone who has perused the writings and statements of gender clinicians. It’s all out in the open, not at all hidden, overtly proselytized as good.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
All the hard won lessons of decades were thrown in the trash when the failed nostrums of the 1970's were rebranded by a new generation of activists, yielding the same results they did the first time around because deranged and dysfunctional ideas inexorably generate failure.
A new layer of dysfunction and delusion was, however, added to the old manias -- transgenderism.
On SNL, it's a joke. In reality, the sorority sisters failed in their federal lawsuit and the Washington Post wrote a weepy feature story about the man who joined the sorority and prevailed in federal court despite claims that he had a visible erection while staring at his sorority sisters portraying him as the world's most vulnerable victim
This is the core of the problem that to my knowledge remains totally unaddressed. Essentially nothing that is done to Harvard or the Ivies will be in the least bit availing in a decade unless even more is done to the Ed schools.
When men say they are women, they are still men and should be treated by the law as what they are rather than what they claim to be. The basic postulate of trans ideology -- that men can become women by saying they are women and that women can become men by saying they are men -- is an untrue claim and cannot serve as the basis of any legal recognition or public policy.
Your legal documents must all list your sex, not your claim to be a different one. Your access to sex segregated facilities is determined by your sex, not by your claim to be a different one. Whatever inconveniences flow from a person's attempt to falsify their sex is not a matter for any public institution to solve. No one has a duty to help anyone else to falsify their sex. No institution has a duty to help anyone else to falsify their sex.
There is no way to force anyone to affirm anyone else's gender identity without destroying another person's right of free speech and free conscience. The claims of transgenderism are implacably imposed to the basic postulates of a liberal, pluralistic society in which everyone has a right to belief and a corollary right to unbelief that no one may legitimately infringe.
I can't prevent you from making the untrue claim that you are the opposite sex from the sex you are in a liberal, pluralistic society. And you cannot prevent me from making the true claim that you are the sex that you are in a liberal, pluralistic society. The same rights that allow you to try to falsify your sex allow me to reject your falsification of your sex.
The entire notion of recognizing trans identity in law is intrinsically a denial of a right that no one can take away from me. It is an inherently illegitimate act for a state to undertake.
He's trying to say "we can do whatever we want, we can ban trans from sports and locker room, but keep requiring everyone to affirm other people's trans identities because there is no real underlying essence, just whatever you decide is socially pragmatic."
In this bizarre exchange, a California Superior Court Judge presiding over a custody hearing asks the father of a trans-identified child if he would be willing to affirm his son in the delusion that he was Queen of England if doing so would help his son avoid psychological harm.
That is to say that the judge was using a reductio ad absurdum of gender affirmation in support of gender affirmation. This moment illustrates a culture that has passed through the eye of a needle.
The judge stripped the father, Edward Hudacko, of custody of his eldest son.
As a condition of the custody agreement, which vested virtually all parental rights solely with the child's mother who was affirming his son as a girl, Hudacko retained a prohibition on any gender identity related surgery on his son while he remained a minor without his prior consent or a court order.
Gender clinicians at UCSF installed a puberty blocking implant in his son's arm in defiance of that condition.
Today, Hudacko's attorneys appear before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals appealing a prior dismissal of his lawsuit seeking to vindicate his constitutional right to direct the medical care of his son that was preserved in his custody agreement and violated by gender doctors who acted in defiance of the terms of that agreement.
Establishing the harms of this specific narrow harm to one father's constitutional rights would create a judicial venue -- the first ever -- to put the entire field of pediatric gender medicalization on trial for the self-conscious acts of serial medical and scientific fraud that were central to its widespread propagation, all of which were exhaustively documented by the bad actors themselves in correspondence that has made its way into the public record in prior court proceedings.
The below link connects to the livestream of the session that starts at 9:30 PDT. The case is sixth on the docket, but the first 4 cases have already been submitted on briefs. I'll update this thread when the case begins. ca9.uscourts.gov/media/live-ora…
I don't like right-wing influencers who constantly repeat the refrain "they want you dead."
But if neither Democratic party leadership nor its electorate sees this sociopathy from the Democratic party's favored candidate to win the state Attorney General race in VA as disqualifying, the refrain is literally true.