Did the USA Collude with russia to Hand Over Kursk?
Last week, I suggested Ukraine’s loss in Kursk might have been part of a secret U.S.-russia deal—akin to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Now, new evidence raises even more questions. 🧵
Last week, I suggested Ukraine’s loss in Kursk might have been part of a secret U.S.-russia deal—akin to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.
Now, new evidence raises even more questions. 🧵
2/ Putin didn’t want to freeze the war without regaining lost russian territory. For “negotiations” to begin, Trump had to help russia retake Kursk.
3/ Right as russia launched a major counteroffensive, Trump cut off U.S. arms and intelligence. The result? Mass casualties.
TIME magazine called it “the worst losses in Kursk.”
TIME magazine called it “the worst losses in Kursk.”
4/ Ukrainian soldiers also reported something alarming:
russian forces in Kursk suddenly had extremely precise coordinates of Ukrainian positions—troops, logistics hubs, ammo depots.
Coincidence? Or did Trump help russia before negotiations?
russian forces in Kursk suddenly had extremely precise coordinates of Ukrainian positions—troops, logistics hubs, ammo depots.
Coincidence? Or did Trump help russia before negotiations?
5/ My take: Trump deliberately crippled Ukraine, letting russia recapture Kursk.
And now, others are seeing the same pattern.
Here’s Robin Horsfall, a veteran & key military voice:
And now, others are seeing the same pattern.
Here’s Robin Horsfall, a veteran & key military voice:
6/ “On Aug 24, 2024, Ukraine became the first nation since WWII to occupy russian territory. The Kursk raid caught russia off guard, forcing it to tie down 30,000 troops for six months.
Militarily? Not critical. Politically? A disaster for Putin.”
Militarily? Not critical. Politically? A disaster for Putin.”
7/ “Ukraine held Kursk thanks to real-time U.S. intelligence, tracking every russian move.
To take it back, russia needed Ukraine blinded.”
To take it back, russia needed Ukraine blinded.”
8/ In Feb 2025, russia built up 50,000 troops for a counteroffensive.
On Feb 28, Trump picked a fight with Zelensky.
Between March 3-5, he used this “dispute” to cut off supplies & intel.
On March 6, russia attacked—and Kursk fell.
On Feb 28, Trump picked a fight with Zelensky.
Between March 3-5, he used this “dispute” to cut off supplies & intel.
On March 6, russia attacked—and Kursk fell.
9/ Here’s the smoking gun:
On Feb 27—before Trump’s cut-off— a russian general in Kursk told a colonel:
“The offensive is waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down.”
The colonel told his wife. His wife told a friend. That friend told my source.
On Feb 27—before Trump’s cut-off— a russian general in Kursk told a colonel:
“The offensive is waiting for Ukrainian surveillance to go down.”
The colonel told his wife. His wife told a friend. That friend told my source.
10/ If the timeline is correct, russia knew Trump would cut U.S. intelligence before his official March 3 announcement.
Did Trump secretly greenlight russia’s attack?
Did Trump secretly greenlight russia’s attack?
11/ Was this a calculated move to pressure Zelensky into a U.S.-brokered ceasefire?
The source is real. The people involved risk their lives by talking.
This isn’t proof of a deal—but it demands scrutiny.
Who can Ukraine & Europe really trust?
(END)
The source is real. The people involved risk their lives by talking.
This isn’t proof of a deal—but it demands scrutiny.
Who can Ukraine & Europe really trust?
(END)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
