🧵As I watch the Trump administration's efforts to end the war in Ukraine and save lives, it appears that the negotiation is part of a larger US policy redesign to improve US-Russia relations, which stipulates that Moscow can be brought into a larger great power agreement. 1/10
If that's indeed the case. i.e., if beyond the ongoing deal-making there is a larger strategy, we may be witnessing another attempt at a "reset" with Russia, only this time when there is a full-scale war raging in Europe, a war in MENA, and clouds gathering over the Pacific. 2/10
Throughout my career I've asked why our policy community would continue to misread and misunderstand Russia--mirror-imaging and projecting priorities that live Western societies onto Russia's sui-generis non-Western culture. This was behind the early post-Cold War euphoria. 3/10
One could understand early optimism, but since Putin's arrival in power it should've been clear that Russia was reverting to its historically determined imperial DNA, and to pretend otherwise was wishful thinking. Still, both Presidents W. Bush and Obama ignored that fact.4/10
Recently a colleague whose expertise I value argued that "after the Cold War we offered Russia a seat at the table." But it should have been clear from the start that Russia always wanted its own table, and that absent a deep cultural change in that society it'll remain so. 5/10
I'm back in Washington for 1.5yrs, and I'm struck by the overall paucity of genuine Russia expertise across our policy community. We debate Russia policy, the future of transatlantic relations, Europe, etc. and yet we do this largely disconnected from the cultural context. 6/10
FAOs I taught in Garmisch knew more about Russia than some of the policy analysts I talk to in DC. What passes for strategic debates here is akin to a grad school seminar on IR theory, for since the end of the Cold War our universities educate precious few Area Specialists. 7/10
This isn't limited to our lack of Russia expertise. People who gave us GWOT promising to change MENA couldn't put a coherent sentence in Arabic together, but built PPT slides to show how they would remake entire Muslim societies. Have we learned nothing from that experience? 8/10
If Washington can't make up for those gaps fast enough, let's bring in the expertise from the Eastern flank of @NATO-analysts from Finland, Poland, the Baltics, etc. Learn from people who've lived next door to Russia, and who have the existential imperative to understand it. 9/10
I'm not holding my breath for our analytical culture to change overnight. Too many equities/too many egos are invested in the status quo. So, we keep repeating the same mistakes, with predictable results. Only with each turn, our resources are fewer, and the price goes up. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵I wonder why we seem to have lost our way. I spent some 20 years of my professional career in academia. As a college professor, I watched up close how our educational system was being gutted. This is not about being on the left or on the right of the political spectrum. 1/10
There is no mirror big enough for the woke left to look into to understand why we are so broken. I watched this up close. I had students in my intro to IR who never read The Federalist Papers, but who could talk of "Western guilt" and the US as being the embodiment of evil. 2/10
I repeat: This isn't about the left or the right of the political spectrum. It is about the irreducible function of the educational system to pass our national and cultural DNA to the next generation. I taught in civilian academia but then switched to JPME for I had enough. 3/10
🧵I've noticed that in discussions in DC about the war in #Ukraine, there is virtually no recognition that ending that war now is not the same as ending the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Most of the debate is conducted by US analysts who lack in-depth knowledge of the region. 1/4
I'd like to remind those experts of what happened when Russia seized Crimea in 2014, then again invaded Ukraine in 2022: That trauma consolidated Ukrainian national identity in direct opposition to Russia. I worked with Ukrainian military and government officials and saw it. 2/4
I'm puzzled why anyone in the West would still listen to Russia's vacuous propaganda about a "Slavic family" and Putin's assertion that "there is no such thing as a Ukrainian nation." After the murders he has committed in Ukraine, most emphatically there is a Ukrainian nation.3/4
🧵Commentary on the war in #Ukraine I've seen of late by so-called "realists" is borderline preening, while #Ukraine is being cut off from US assistance. With each passing day, a peace deal to end the war- short of Ukraine's de facto capitulation-seems less and less likely. 1/10
Such "realist" comments on the war have been couched in an air of inevitability, as though wars were simply about a calculus of population numbers, landmass and mobilized resources. But history is replete with cases when smaller powers managed to defeat a bigger adversary. 2/10
The Biden administration never gave #Ukraine a chance to win, absent sufficient resources and authorities to break the invading Russian military and render it combat-ineffective. That window did exist during the first Ukrainian offensive in 2022, but Washington was too timid.3/10
🧵Much has been written of late about the end of America's primacy (some by commentators in Europe who seem to exude Schadenfreude rooted in deeply seated anti-Americanism), citing the rise of #China and the inability of the Joint Force to fight two major theater campaigns. 1/10
I'll set aside for now why our military was reformatted for GWOT, or the rationale for contracting the force pursued by several US presidents since 1991. But I will submit that most of the responsibility for the West's relative weakness today doesn't rest with the US. 2/10
America's population is 4.2% of the world's total, but the US has consistently accounted for over 25% of the global GDP (in 1945 the US was at 50%). According to most military strength indices, the US has the strongest military in the world, leveraging our budget and tech. 3/10
🧵I’ve been following various analyses in US and European sources trying to gauge the goals of the new US policy towards Russia. Since the word “reset” now dominates the conversation I will use it in this post, though I would argue it doesn’t capture the state of affairs. 1/12
The most obvious explanation is the “Kissinger-in-reverse,” i.e., the Trump administration trying to disaggregate the Sino-Russian alliance, or at least put some daylight between Moscow and Beijing. If that’s the case, it won’t work-different times, different circumstances. 2/12
What’s missing in this “reset” plan is a realistic assessment of the nature of the Russian state and Putin’s objectives for the past 25 years. BLUF: Putin wants the US out of Europe. It’s been the key Russian goal since 1945-to fracture @NATO and decouple Europe from the US.3/12
🧵A couple of brief observations at the end of a long day here in DC. When I taught at @NavalWarCollege I would tell my students that it's nations, not armies or navies, that go to war. It's about national cohesion that forms the basis of national strength and resilience. 1/6
I'd tell them that mobilized democracies are unbeatable, that no dictatorship can muster the level of commitment that free people can bring to bear when rallied around a common cause. There is no enemy soldier or sailor out there that can outmatch a free citizen volunteer. 2/6
I bring this up because today I witnessed several exchanges on key foreign policy issues that were so bitterly adversarial and unyielding that it made me question for the first time whether the American nation can recover from this rancor, or if we will continue to fracture. 3/6