Three additional MAGA X influencers got swatted today: @Beard_Vet , @matt_vanswol , @GrageDustin .
I used Grok to compile the following list of swatting victims and then ran it through both Grok and OpenAIās deep research tools to find common patterns.
I also used AI to analyze who wasnāt swatted, to identify differentiating factors. Finally, I attempt to identify the next high priority targets. Thread follows. š
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin The top AI identifying factor among swatted victims: association with @elonmusk , and/or prominence in alt-media such as InfoWars or War Room.
Documenting receipts (sorry, this will be slow):
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk . @JoeTalkShow is a big fan of Elon:
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow .@elonmusk has a history of interacting with @GuntherEagleman , @Shawn_Farash , @catturd2 , @matt_vanswol :
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 . @GrageDustin is in the list as well. @Beard_Vet 's association is less obvious, but he is a frequent reply guy, as is Gunther's brother @RealHickory :
Another common factor AI identified was that most of the victims either expressed support for Israel or anti-Hamas sentiment, distinguishing them from other alt-media influencers. Receipts from @RealHickory , @JoeTalkShow , @GuntherEagleman , @realchasegeiser . Important to note that both Mr. Eagleman and Mr. Geiser are against foreign aid for Israel, so this is not a blanket pro-Israel sentiment.
The reason I mention this is, again, this soft pro-Israel siding is a significant differentiating factor from other right-wing members.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser Another common factor is that AI noted all of those accounts amplify each other frequently, and many have been guests on either InfoWars, or War Room, or both. They form a clique of sorts, with the possible exception of @JoeTalkShow who is more mainstream.
Frequent amplification by @BasedMikeLee on all those accounts was also noted.
High profile media accounts more closely associated with the mainstream, such as @charliekirk11 , @JackPosobiec , and their associates were not considered targets.
There are clear patterns emerging.
High risk factors for swatting:
š¹ Engagement with Elon Musk and amplification by Elon Musk
š¹ Amplification by @BasedMikeLee
š¹ Guests on InfoWars, War Room, or adjacent alt-media shows
š¹ Expressed pro-Israel, or at least anti-Hamas sentiments
š¹ Frequently amplified other swatting victims
I was not able to confirm if @atensnut (1.7M followers) got swatted, but she did get nuisance pizza deliveries this week and she fulfills most or all of the above criteria.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec Given these, who are at highest risk of swattings?
@ScottPresler is the number one top target. He's amplified by Elon, he's had his share of negative attention.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler Other influencers AI suggested are @MarkDice , @Cernovich , @bennyjohnson .
And @RealAlexJones , @nataliegwinters , and anyone else associated with their shows should be considered high risk as well.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters Finally, forgot @nicksortor . He did not show up on the list because it was his father swatted, not him, so he occupies kind of a gray zone here. But he does fulfill all criteria.
Also, one more comment: people have speculated if the cyberattack has to do with the swatting.
My opinion is: no. Why? Because larger anonymous accounts were not affected. For the most part, all swatting victims had their real name identities known. You can purchase addresses easily offline or peruse voter rolls.
So add another risk factor:
š¹ Real life identity is known
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor And, forgot to add @WCdispatch_ to the swatted list, who also meets most of the above criteria:
Let's recap. Here are the risk factors to being a target of swatting:
š¹ Engagement with Elon Musk and amplification by Elon Musk
š¹ Real life identity is known
š¹ 50K+ follower count, usually 150K+
š¹ Guests or employees of InfoWars, War Room, or adjacent alt-media shows
š¹ Expressed pro-Israel, or at least anti-Hamas sentiments
š¹ Frequently amplified other swatting victims in the past
š¹ Amplification by @BasedMikeLee
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ Some have noted that all the targets are male, which might explain why @atensnut , @nataliegwinters , and I fulfill these criteria but are not swatted. Perhaps it has to do with the logistics of not being a "protector" of household.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ @atensnut It may also be a hint that @EagleEdMartin 's office reached out to me specifically this week. It could indicate that his agency quickly identified me as a high risk target.
One last thought for tonight: My current leading theory is that this is a terrorist campaign targeting X and influencers connected to Elon.
The criteria I mentioned may be secondary to the fact that X is the primary platform being used by all victims.
It also explains why Elon commented on the Salt Lake Tribune inciting harassment of my distillery and crowdsourced information on Tesla firebombings, but has not commented on this. He does not want to incite panic on the platform.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ @atensnut @EagleEdMartin . @matt_vanswol suggested that foreign actors might be involved. I also find it possible that it isnāt a coincidence that this began alongside the cyberattacks on X from Ukraine and may even be the work of the same group.
At least two were more swatted on the early morning of March 17th. the Elon connection is not as strong, but both are primary X platform, alt-media journalists with known real-life identities.
@ImFiredUp2 - from South Carolina, lowest follower count yet at 40.5K. Is a podcaster and responds to Elon frequently.
@LarryTaunton - location unknown, Grok seems to think Alabama, another podcaster with a strong X presence and 154.5K follower count.
I'd like to aggregate timestamps and timezones from the victims, so if you can reply with the times you got swatted, we can see if there's any overlap there. The pattern seems to be 2-4 a night, suggesting the perpetuators are either limited in resources or intentionally stretching out the campaign.
So far I have @matt_vanswol who got swatted at 1:40 AM ET on 16 March.
Added @realstewpeters to the list, attempted swat on 16 March. Although Elon replied to him last year, he is an extreme outlier in that he is not MAGA and is quite critical of Israel. Nonetheless he has a big alt-media platform on X. If you could provide time + time zone, that would be great!
I got timestamps from all three swatting victims from yesterday.
Interestingly, they are almost exactly two hours apart each.
Converted to EET (Eastern European Time), they are:
@GrageDustin - 5:35 AM EET, 16 March 2025
@matt_vanswol - 7:40 AM EET, 16 March 2025
@Beard_Vet - 9:43 AM EET, 16 March 2025
⢠⢠ā¢
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last night, Darializa Avila Chevalier ā endorsed by NYC-DSA (Democratic Socialists of America) ā beat a five-term incumbent to win New York's 13th congressional district.
@AsraNomani has been reporting on their ties to Cuba and the China/Singham network. But whatās not known is DSAās deep ties to the German government.
The Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung (RLS) is the political foundation of Die Linke ā the German parliamentary party formed from the merger of the Party of Democratic Socialism, itself the legal successor to East Germany's ruling Marxist party, the SED.
Under German law, every party in the Bundestag gets a taxpayer-funded foundation. Die Linke's share is approximately EUR70MM annually.
Most German party foundations sponsor conferences, publish research, and fund exchange programs. What RLS-NYC did was put its own staff inside DSA's organizational leadership ā concurrently ā for over a decade.
In 2012, RLS opened a New York office. EIN 45-3658022. Their own annual report states: "With the help of funds from the BMZ and the Foreign Office, the Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung maintains a network of international relationships. This includes financing its foreign offices."
Over the last 13 years, Berlin has sent millions to this office.
Despite these ties, no FARA registration for the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung was identified in the Department of Justice database.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread.š
Neal Meyer is listed on the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation's payroll as "Project Manager."
Meyer previously served as NYC-DSA's chapter treasurer from 2016 to 2018.
On January 15, Meyer published "Big Stakes in the Big Apple" on , a strategic analysis of DSA's electoral prospects after Mamdani's mayoral victory.
One week later, NYC-DSA voted endorse Darializa Avila Chevalier for NY-13. rosalux.nyc
šØš§µ BREAKING - The "conservative" protest against AI data centers has an anti-ICE NGO organizer, a DSA member, Facebook money.
Other than that, totally grassroots.
Axios ran an "exclusive" Wednesday about a "conservative group" called Humans First planning a nationwide day of protest against AI data centers on July 18. Amy Kremer is chairing it and invoking the Tea Party.
Axios didn't mention that Humans First was incubated by the Center for AI Safety, an organization funded with millions from Facebook co-founder Dustin Moskovitz. Or that its original staff included a Sunrise Movement organizer who sat in at Pelosi's office with AOC and a DSA member who organized for Kamala Harris.
NBC News described CAIS as having founded Humans First "to be a sort of Trojan horse to make AI safety issues more palatable to a conservative political audience."
@ParkerThayer exposed the Action Network backend.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. š
Credit to @ParkerThayer for finding this Action Network backend and inspiring me to dig a bit deeper.
šØ THREAD: What do Mike Pence, Mike Pompeo, John Bolton, and Elaine Chao have in common? They were all paid by a Marxist-Islamist Iran group that was designated as terrorist until 2012.
No, this is not a joke.
Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) was founded by leftist Islamists to oppose the western-backed Pahlavi, and participated in his 1979 overthrow. Khomeini barred MEK afterwards. MEK was implicated in multiple bombings, including that of Americans, and remained an openly armed group until 2003.
Since they got de-listed as a terrorist organization in 2012 on procedural grounds, MEK and their fronts have been actively recruiting US politicians selling themselves as a moderate alternative to Khomeini. But RAND Corporation says MEK meets the qualifications for a cult, citing criteria such as forcing their members to work 16+ hour days and forced divorces.
Polls of the Iranian-American community shows that they do NOT accept Rajavi, MeK's leader, as legitimate, with a 46-point net disapproval - numbers nearly as bad as the existing regime.
As Pence's former Chief of Staff, Marc Short, has already weighed against Trump deal, it's helpful to recall this.
Receipts below. As always, patience as I pull the thread together.š
In an interview with @ItsYourGov , National Council of Resistance of Iran director and MeK representative Alireza Jafarzadeh was asked directly: "Is your group involved in any sort of lobbying or payments for speeches to prominent individuals such as Mike Pompeo?"
NCRI-US said "absolutely not."
@ItsYourGov Jafarzadeh is the registrant contact on FARA Registration #6171 for NCRI-US for Iran, on behalf of MeK.
š§µ THREAD: Shashank Joshi, a foreign think tank careerist, has a 16-year record of attacking US foreign policy... and now he's lecturing our military leadership on how to take the oath. Why does he still have a work visa?
He's an Indian national who arrived in April and is already the loudest critic of the Pentagon on social media.
The Economist's new Washington Bureau Chief ā an Indian national on a visa who just arrived in April ā went on a Canadian national security podcast literally titled "The Problem of America" and said this about US military operations:
"They have attacked scores of small boats in the Pacific and the Caribbean. They've killed dozens of people in a campaign that is, by most accounts, quite illegal and contrary to international law."
That's Shashank Joshi, @shashj . Defence editor turned bureau chief. Two months in the country and he's already built a 16-year paper trail calling American power "malevolent," "predatory," and "quite illegal" ā while sitting on the advisory board of a UK think tank funded by the European Commission, BAE Systems, and the US State Department.
And he's now lecturing our military leadership on what it means to take the oath.
I have the receipts.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. š
Shashank Joshi has been in DC for two months, and is already lecturing our military officials on what their oaths mean⦠even though his entire record is criticizing the US military.
He's an Indian national. Cambridge. Enrolled in a Harvard PhD program... but his public profiles list no doctorate, suggesting he dropped out. Senior Research Fellow at RUSI, the world's oldest defence think tank. Then a stint at the Tony Blair Institute. The Economist hired him as Defence Editor in 2018. Promoted to Washington Bureau Chief, April 2026.
Everyone has their opinion on the Iran war or Israel. Maybe that opinion is enough to deter them from supporting Trump. I may not agree with it, but I understand where it comes from and it's a free country.
But when that turns into allying with Communists - that's when I have to speak up.
Institutional left-wing populism IS Communism. I'm not using it as a slur as in everyone to the left is a Communist. I mean it literally.
I'm talking about PSL, CODEPINK, Singham groups. The movements on the left that are anti-globalist are overwhelmingly Marxist.
šØš§µ BREAKING: Former DHS Chief Miles Taylor's prank site collected death threats against the President and 4,000+ people's personal data. Then exposed them through all an open API. šØ
Two days ago, I showed you how Miles Taylor's GTFO ICE site exposed 17,000+ people's data on an open API. That site halted sign-ups and is still "under construction."
But Taylor's organization DEFIANCE[.]org didn't just build one leaky site. They built two. On the same server.
UndoTrump[.]org ā launched April 1, 2026 as an "April Fools' joke" ā collects names, emails, and political messages from people signing up for fictional "Removal Parties" at government buildings. The White House Ballroom. The Kennedy Center. The DOJ. Battleships.
4,000+ signup records. 3,300+ unique people. Same vulnerability. Same API. Same zero authentication.
And this one has death threats against a sitting President in the database.
The man who was deputy chief of staff for the department that houses the Secret Service couldn't secure a sign-up form. Again.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. š
Here's a video of Miles himself soliciting PII in sign-ups. He implies he's not saving the user data... but he did.
Same server. Same IP address. 34.111.179.208. Google Cloud Platform. Same React 19 frontend. Same Express.js backend. Same registrar. Domains registered 13 days apart.
This wasn't two mistakes. This was one codebase deployed twice. Name.com