Three additional MAGA X influencers got swatted today: @Beard_Vet , @matt_vanswol , @GrageDustin .
I used Grok to compile the following list of swatting victims and then ran it through both Grok and OpenAI’s deep research tools to find common patterns.
I also used AI to analyze who wasn’t swatted, to identify differentiating factors. Finally, I attempt to identify the next high priority targets. Thread follows. 👇
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin The top AI identifying factor among swatted victims: association with @elonmusk , and/or prominence in alt-media such as InfoWars or War Room.
Documenting receipts (sorry, this will be slow):
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk . @JoeTalkShow is a big fan of Elon:
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow .@elonmusk has a history of interacting with @GuntherEagleman , @Shawn_Farash , @catturd2 , @matt_vanswol :
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 . @GrageDustin is in the list as well. @Beard_Vet 's association is less obvious, but he is a frequent reply guy, as is Gunther's brother @RealHickory :
Another common factor AI identified was that most of the victims either expressed support for Israel or anti-Hamas sentiment, distinguishing them from other alt-media influencers. Receipts from @RealHickory , @JoeTalkShow , @GuntherEagleman , @realchasegeiser . Important to note that both Mr. Eagleman and Mr. Geiser are against foreign aid for Israel, so this is not a blanket pro-Israel sentiment.
The reason I mention this is, again, this soft pro-Israel siding is a significant differentiating factor from other right-wing members.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser Another common factor is that AI noted all of those accounts amplify each other frequently, and many have been guests on either InfoWars, or War Room, or both. They form a clique of sorts, with the possible exception of @JoeTalkShow who is more mainstream.
Frequent amplification by @BasedMikeLee on all those accounts was also noted.
High profile media accounts more closely associated with the mainstream, such as @charliekirk11 , @JackPosobiec , and their associates were not considered targets.
There are clear patterns emerging.
High risk factors for swatting:
🔹 Engagement with Elon Musk and amplification by Elon Musk
🔹 Amplification by @BasedMikeLee
🔹 Guests on InfoWars, War Room, or adjacent alt-media shows
🔹 Expressed pro-Israel, or at least anti-Hamas sentiments
🔹 Frequently amplified other swatting victims
I was not able to confirm if @atensnut (1.7M followers) got swatted, but she did get nuisance pizza deliveries this week and she fulfills most or all of the above criteria.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec Given these, who are at highest risk of swattings?
@ScottPresler is the number one top target. He's amplified by Elon, he's had his share of negative attention.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler Other influencers AI suggested are @MarkDice , @Cernovich , @bennyjohnson .
And @RealAlexJones , @nataliegwinters , and anyone else associated with their shows should be considered high risk as well.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters Finally, forgot @nicksortor . He did not show up on the list because it was his father swatted, not him, so he occupies kind of a gray zone here. But he does fulfill all criteria.
Also, one more comment: people have speculated if the cyberattack has to do with the swatting.
My opinion is: no. Why? Because larger anonymous accounts were not affected. For the most part, all swatting victims had their real name identities known. You can purchase addresses easily offline or peruse voter rolls.
So add another risk factor:
🔹 Real life identity is known
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor And, forgot to add @WCdispatch_ to the swatted list, who also meets most of the above criteria:
Let's recap. Here are the risk factors to being a target of swatting:
🔹 Engagement with Elon Musk and amplification by Elon Musk
🔹 Real life identity is known
🔹 50K+ follower count, usually 150K+
🔹 Guests or employees of InfoWars, War Room, or adjacent alt-media shows
🔹 Expressed pro-Israel, or at least anti-Hamas sentiments
🔹 Frequently amplified other swatting victims in the past
🔹 Amplification by @BasedMikeLee
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ Some have noted that all the targets are male, which might explain why @atensnut , @nataliegwinters , and I fulfill these criteria but are not swatted. Perhaps it has to do with the logistics of not being a "protector" of household.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ @atensnut It may also be a hint that @EagleEdMartin 's office reached out to me specifically this week. It could indicate that his agency quickly identified me as a high risk target.
One last thought for tonight: My current leading theory is that this is a terrorist campaign targeting X and influencers connected to Elon.
The criteria I mentioned may be secondary to the fact that X is the primary platform being used by all victims.
It also explains why Elon commented on the Salt Lake Tribune inciting harassment of my distillery and crowdsourced information on Tesla firebombings, but has not commented on this. He does not want to incite panic on the platform.
@Beard_Vet @matt_vanswol @GrageDustin @elonmusk @JoeTalkShow @GuntherEagleman @Shawn_Farash @catturd2 @RealHickory @realchasegeiser @BasedMikeLee @charliekirk11 @JackPosobiec @ScottPresler @MarkDice @Cernovich @bennyjohnson @RealAlexJones @nataliegwinters @nicksortor @WCdispatch_ @atensnut @EagleEdMartin . @matt_vanswol suggested that foreign actors might be involved. I also find it possible that it isn’t a coincidence that this began alongside the cyberattacks on X from Ukraine and may even be the work of the same group.
At least two were more swatted on the early morning of March 17th. the Elon connection is not as strong, but both are primary X platform, alt-media journalists with known real-life identities.
@ImFiredUp2 - from South Carolina, lowest follower count yet at 40.5K. Is a podcaster and responds to Elon frequently.
@LarryTaunton - location unknown, Grok seems to think Alabama, another podcaster with a strong X presence and 154.5K follower count.
I'd like to aggregate timestamps and timezones from the victims, so if you can reply with the times you got swatted, we can see if there's any overlap there. The pattern seems to be 2-4 a night, suggesting the perpetuators are either limited in resources or intentionally stretching out the campaign.
So far I have @matt_vanswol who got swatted at 1:40 AM ET on 16 March.
Added @realstewpeters to the list, attempted swat on 16 March. Although Elon replied to him last year, he is an extreme outlier in that he is not MAGA and is quite critical of Israel. Nonetheless he has a big alt-media platform on X. If you could provide time + time zone, that would be great!
I got timestamps from all three swatting victims from yesterday.
Interestingly, they are almost exactly two hours apart each.
Converted to EET (Eastern European Time), they are:
@GrageDustin - 5:35 AM EET, 16 March 2025
@matt_vanswol - 7:40 AM EET, 16 March 2025
@Beard_Vet - 9:43 AM EET, 16 March 2025
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The question is not whether such awards exist—I have already acknowledged that they do. The issue at hand is not a matter of finding a counter-example and declaring the metric validated. The real question is which heuristic is more accurate: relying on "current award value" or assuming that contractors typically spend up to their maximum authority.
The scale of relevant awards is vast—tens of thousands exceed $1 million and collectively amount to trillions. In contrast, you have cited only a few dozen exceptions. You are not providing not a refutation; you prove to have a fundamental misunderstanding of how heuristic correctness is determined.
Historically and consistently, contractors spend to their maximum authority. Given this reality, the most accurate heuristic for estimating savings is to use potential award value.
I trust this clarifies the point.
In my initial run, which processed the first 60,000 rows, I did not find these awards—my hard drive overheated long before I could complete a full pass through the database. In a later run, which I referenced in another post, I did identify two such awards. That discrepancy is a matter of sampling size, not an issue with the query itself.
I’ll now attempt a full run, which should capture the awards you found.
Running on the full dataset now and I think it'll complete this time! Found a bug which underestimated the number of awards that ended under their potential value, but also underestimated the number of awards that ended OVER their potential value. And
🧵 (Re-posting after it was accidentally made exclusive)
Doing a thought-of-consciousness thread here. First up, Troublemakers. They are small and grassroots, with no EIN that I could link to them yet. They were featured in a news article wherein they asked Amazon to stop buying fracked gas from GTN XPress - which seems to be a highly specific request.
🧵 I was curious about this coordination, so I dived into this with AI and came up with a lot of names. Thread follows:
First off, the Senate Democratic Caucus operates a Senate Democratic Media Center (SDMC), which “serves as a one-stop-shop for Democratic offices looking for high-level digital assets,” providing video editors, studios, and digital strategists for coordinated content.
AI speculates that content was centrally developed – most likely under the direction of Senate Democratic leadership’s communications arm – and then executed by the senators’ communications staff in coordination.
But the rabbit hole doesn't end here. Hang on...
AI speculates one specific person is leading this: Justin Goodman, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's former communications director.
And indeed, if you go to his website, his biography brags about him as “the chief spokesman for every Senate battle in recent memory.”
In addition to Goodman, Schumer’s communications director and the staff at the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee (DPCC) or the Strategic Communications Committee (SCC) in the Senate likely spearheaded this effort.
The DPCC/SCC is essentially the messaging and media strategy hub for Senate Democrats.
AI speculates that SDMC’s Video Production Director Nora Younkin would have handled the technical creation of the videos.
🚨 NEW TOOL: PEOPLE RELATIONS (BETA) 🚨
🔎 DIG DEEP. CONNECT THE DOTS.
I’ve built a powerful tool to help you search names and uncover how people, entities, and organizations connect. Visualize relationships in an interactive graph and see who’s tied to whom – all in just a few clicks.
Here’s what you can do:
✅ Search by Name – Enter any keyword and quickly see matching individuals
✅ Color-Coded Categories – Instantly differentiate connections like FAMILY, WORK, POLITICAL, LEGAL, and more.
✅ Interactive Graph Exploration – Pan and zoom with ease. Download your findings as SVG for offline analysis.
✅ Bullet Summaries – Each node can include key info to help you grasp context at a glance.
💡 Whether you're investigating personal ties, mapping historical links, or demanding greater transparency, this BETA tool places massive relational data at your fingertips.
⚠️ Still ironing out the edges and @watilo will go fix it – thanks for your patience! Data-heavy and best viewed on desktop.
👇 Try it now: [link in next post]