BREAKING: Canadian Prime Minister @MarkJCarney’s daughter went to the UK’s infamous gender clinic, the Tavistock, when she was a child.

In this essay discovered by True North News, Sasha Carney (formerly Sophia) writes of her visits to the Tavistock.

She also rails against ‘transphobes,’ and tells of her childhood inspiration for identifying as transmasculine — a ‘boygirl’ identity encouraged by Enid Blyton books that her mother starting buying her.

“My teenage years existed in close proximity to this TERF-driven scrutiny, which was fixated on identifying how ‘authentically trans’ people like me really were.

“In 2013, shortly after I chopped off all my hair into a deeply regrettable floppy Justin Bieber cut, I moved to London, the land of Enid Blyton murder mysteries. A block from my new house was the Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust, an imposing grey building which contained the country's only child and adolescent ‘gender identity clinic.’

“I watched as my friend, after a year of weekly appointments trying desperately to get an official diagnosis of gender dysphoria, was denied the diagnosis, and with it any hope of top surgery because they sometimes wore skirts.

“I watched organisations with names like
@Transgendertrd refer to trans Tavistock patients as ‘experimental subjects’who didn't know what was best for them.

“I watched as my school's former principal told a national news outlet that trans students like me and many of my close friends were c*s women who were only coming out to ‘cause turbulence’ and ‘adhere to anything a bit radical.’

“I watched all this happen, and I quietly stopped wearing underwire bras, and wore baggier clothes, and I felt a fierce surge of jealousy every time I walked into the Tavistock for therapy and saw patients turn left, towards the medical spaces I didn't feel ‘trans enough’ to enter.”

Did Liberal leader Mark Carney approve of these visits to the Tavistock, the home of the UK’s childhood sex changes?

Full essay text in thread, below. 👇🏼Image
Image
“When I was in elementary school, my mother started buying me Enid Blyton books. The British series weren't so much novels as they were morality tales, with the same stock characters recycled over and over to deter impressionable little British lasses from the seven deadly sins (gluttony, sloth, envy, wrath, believing in yourself, stealing sweets from the penny shop, and lying to your mum about when you'd be home for tea). One stock character in particular always fascinated me - the rambunctious, uncontainable boygirl.

“The boygirl is as complex as she is simple. She is White and wealthy, with a tangle of dark hair cut short or tied back - her pet peeve is having any of it fall into her eyes. She has several brothers who taught her how to ride horses or climb trees.

“She has little-to-no interest in boys, except when she expresses her desire to be one. And crucially, she has an extravagantly feminine name (Georgina, Josephine, or Wilhelmina), which she adamantly shortens to George, Jo, or Bill.

“In hindsight, her queerness is undeniable, almost textual. I'm tempted to believe that it's the very thing that drew me to her as I sat, not quite a tomboy, yet certainly not a "real girl," long hair pulled back in a snarled ponytail but still giving into my family's insistence that I wear dresses to church. The boygirl was both everything I was a little bit in love with and everything I didn't have the guts to be.

“Of course, at the time I had no way of knowing that Bills, Jos, and Georges existed outside Enid Blyton's imagination, that the world was full near to the brim with boygirls and girlboys, every possible gender I could imagine, and some I couldn't.

“I also didn't know that transgender children were becoming an increasingly visible demographic at the very moment I was becoming one, or that visibility can come at a hefty price.”
“In Histories of the Transgender Child, trans of color critic Julian Gill-Peterson writes at length about our tendency to see trans children as "a means to some abstract end," rather than simply young people leading young trans lives. Children who display visible gender nonconformity are all too often made to carry hefty, and profoundly contradictory arguments, serving both as evidence that transness has "always been there," and that it's only a youthful phase.

"They're just kids!" one side shrieks, shuddering at the thought of their children being "exploited" by some worldwide political trans agenda. "We all have phases.
They're too young to possibly know!" "On the contrary!" protests the other side.
"It is precisely because they're so young that they must know! This is proof that trans adults are born this way, and know they're trans from the start!"

“You'll notice that both of these voices are speaking in the third person. There is no time, here, to consult trans children themselves, who only become a tool, a ruler by which to measure "authentic" transness.

“For the former perspective, trans childhood is treated as nothing more than a plea for attention. As increasing numbers of minors medically and socially transition, transphobes, particularly trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) have reacted violently. Endless threads on British-based mommy blogger site Mumsnet or "gender-critical feminist" forum @4th_WaveNow tell supposed "horror stories" of transitioning children, almost entirely assigned female at birth (AFAB).

“A familiar story emerges -- the transmasculine child becomes nothing more than a confused girl, led astray by a combination of "misogynistic" trans activism and a desperate need for attention. Their friends pressure them into "identifying as" a boy or a nonbinary person, and they supposedly move further and further away from their "true" self, sinking further into depression as they go.”
“My teenage years existed in close proximity to this TERF-driven scrutiny, which was fixated on identifying how ‘authentically trans’ people like me really were.

“In 2013, shortly after I chopped off all my hair into a deeply regrettable floppy Justin Bieber cut, I moved to London, the land of Enid Blyton murder mysteries. A block from my new house was the Tavistock & Portman NHS Foundation Trust, an imposing grey building which contained the country's only child and adolescent ‘gender identity clinic.’

“I watched as my friend, after a year of weekly appointments trying desperately to get an official diagnosis of gender dysphoria, was denied the diagnosis, and with it any hope of top surgery because they sometimes wore skirts.

“I watched organisations with names like
@Transgendertrd refer to trans Tavistock patients as ‘experimental subjects’who didn't know what was best for them.

“I watched as my school's former principal told a national news outlet that trans students like me and many of my close friends were c*s women who were only coming out to ‘cause turbulence’ and ‘adhere to anything a bit radical.’

“I watched all this happen, and I quietly stopped wearing underwire bras, and wore baggier clothes, and I felt a fierce surge of jealousy every time I walked into the Tavistock for therapy and saw patients turn left, towards the medical spaces I didn't feel ‘trans enough’ to enter.”
“As someone who felt barred from it for years, I believe firmly trans children deserve access to compre-hensive, free, and accessible gender-related medical care. But I have my own hesitations about trans activism that focuses too heavily on dysphoria diagnosis and surgery dates.

“It's tempting to counter TERF logic by pointing to examples of trans children who have "always known," exhibit textbook symptoms of gender dysphoria, and can be easily placed within a transition timeline. But in its most extreme form, this argument morphs into transmedicalism. Transmedi-calists, or "transmeds," are those who fixate on acute gender dysphoria as a litmus test for "true" transness.

“Transmed Youtubers mock nonbinary people and gender nonconforming trans people as "transtrenders." The message becomes clear: the only "authentic" form of transness is one that can be diagnosed by rules set out by cisgender medical professionals. The "legitimacy" of my gender again disappears.”
“Whether TERF or transmed, the same implications about trans children arise over and over again. If we can only get to the bottom of the true meaning of trans childhood, the "debate" asserts, we will understand the meaning of transness itself.

“If we can only objectively prove, with clinical diagnoses and data science, that childhood gender dysphoria does or does not persist into adulthood, is or is not alleviated by medical intervention, then we can prove the "truth" of trans identity. They neglect to realise that identity has never been that easily digestible. I didn't have, in many ways, an “authentically" trans or not-trans childhood. I related uneasily to femininity, but not with revulsion. I wore eyeliner and lipstick throughout much of high school. I had few girl friends in elementary school, but never expressed a desire to "run around with the boys."

“So where does that leave me? Am I a c*s woman pretending? A trans man running from my own identity? A nonbinary person finally expressing my "true" authentic self?”
“The truth is, honestly, that most trans children and young adults have experiences not dissimilar to my own. Most lie somewhere in between what trans and cis childhood is "supposed" to look like.Who's to say, for instance, who the boygirl of my childhood stories “really was"?

“A 2019 production of an Enid Blyton series interpreted her tomboy character Bill as a trans-masculine nonbinary person. Following the release of Greta Gerwig's Little Women, a flurry of fan interpretations wrote Jo March alternately as a c*s lesbian and a trans man. I'm thrilled by all of these perspectives. These narratives coexist in real life, and though they differ greatly, they also sometimes overlap. That doesn't mean, by any means, that transness doesn't have a place in them.”
“Trans children deserve support, love, affirmation of their identity, and access to resources like puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and gender-affirming clothing.

“They also deserve to have all of this on their own terms, without the legitimacy of their transness being interrogated, over and over, by transmeds and TERFs.

“So let's make space for the trans kids who exist in ways not legible to gender identity clinics, or whose narratives are too frequently co-opted by supposed ‘concerned parents.’ Let's hear it for the ‘inauthentic’ trans kids, believing in themselves just hard enough, running home late for afternoon tea.” - Sasha Carney, daughter of Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
The original publication of Sasha Carney’s essay can be found here: static1.squarespace.com/static/598d52a…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇦🇺

Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇦🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BillboardChris

Jan 23
The World Economic Forum just spent 2 minutes talking about my presence on the promenade, and even featured my Dad sign on their big screen!

Dad: A human male who protects his kids from gender ideology.

They’re talking about the backlash to LGBTQ. What they need to understand is it’s really backlash to TQ, and it has only just begun.
I always say “good things happen when you go outside,” and that proved true again today.

I’m on a mission to end child transition worldwide, one conversation at a time.

If you wish to support my campaign, I’m so thankful for your help.
billboardchris.com/donate
Here’s the link to the full session on “Protecting LGBTQI+ Lives.”

weforum.org/meetings/world…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 21
President Trump just nuked gender ideology.

Here is the full Executive Order.

Very important! The President rightly uses the word ‘sex.’ Not ‘gender.’

There are two sexes, zero genders, and infinite personalities. 🧵 Image
Image
It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.

These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.

Under my direction, the Executive Branch will enforce all sex-protective laws to promote this reality, and the following definitions shall govern all Executive interpretation of and application of Federal law and administration policy:

“Sex” shall refer to an individual’s immutable biological classification as either male or female.  “Sex” is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of “gender identity.”

“Women” or “woman” and “girls” or “girl” shall mean adult and juvenile human females, respectively.

“Men” or “man” and “boys” or “boy” shall mean adult and juvenile human males, respectively.

“Female” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the large reproductive cell.

“Male” means a person belonging, at conception, to the sex that produces the small reproductive cell.Image
“Gender identity” reflects a fully internal and subjective sense of self, disconnected from biological reality and sex and existing on an infinite continuum, that does not provide a meaningful basis for identification and cannot be recognized as a replacement for sex. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 17
The Daily Mail has picked up the story of Micah LeRoy, a young woman with cerebral palsy who was put on testosterone as a child and received a double mastectomy last month.

They also spoke with her, via her mother who ‘translated.’

I’ve edited the article below to correct the Daily Mail’s misgendering.Image
“A transgender teen with cerebral palsy who went viral after posting about her breast-removal surgery has told DailyMail.com that she knew what she was doing and is happy with her choices.

“Micah LeRoy, 19, a University of Minnesota student, had a double mastectomy last month and shared footage about the procedure, and her painful but swift recovery, on Instagram.

“Those videos exploded on conservative social media on Thursday, with critics calling Micah a victim who should not have been greenlighted for a sex change because of her disability.

“But, speaking with DailyMail.com, Micah said she had a long history of gender identity issues and that she is glad she provoked a reaction because she 'wanted to blow up the internet.'   

“Micah's case raises tough questions about whether disabled people and minors should be allowed to take puberty blockers or cross-sex hormones and undergo sex change operations.

“Micah's disability, cerebral palsy, affects movement and muscle control. She is able to speak and write for herself, gets straight As at college, and is involved in state politics.”
‘I am making these decisions,' said Micah.

'I am my own legal guardian. And people don't understand that.' 

“Micah can speak on her own, but was aided in this interview by her mom Kathie LeRoy, who was effectively translating her words.

“She says she came out aged 14 during the pandemic, when her home city Minneapolis was convulsed by protests over the police killing of George Floyd.

“She says she always knew 'something was up' with her gender identity, but that her decision was accelerated by joining a group of mostly LGBTQ teenagers.

“This may raise concerns about Micah's choices, as critics have warned of a 'social contagion' of peer pressure driving a sharp uptick in the number of trans adolescents.

“She charted her girl-to-boy transition on Instagram as @disabled_trans_boy, from taking cross-sex hormones aged 17 to wearing chest binders.”
Read 6 tweets
Dec 13, 2024
Gender-affirming care. Image
A radial forearm free flap (RFFF) involves taking the skin, fat, nerves, arteries and veins from the wrist to about halfway up the forearm to create the fake penis.
Truly from a horror movie. This procedure is advertised by children’s hospitals.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 6, 2024
Massive news!

Clementine — a young woman given puberty blockers at 12, testosterone at 13, and a double mastectomy at 14 — is suing!

This lawsuit is devastating, and involves the biggest names in the fraudulent field of ‘gender medicine.’

She’s suing Dr. Johanna Olson-Kennedy, who runs the busiest gender clinic in America; the surgeon, Dr. Scott Mosser; the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles; St. Francis Memorial Hospital; and therapist Susan Landon.

THE LAWSUIT

This case is about a team of purported health care providers who collectively decided that a vulnerable girl struggling with complex mental health struggles and suffering from multiple instances of sexual abuse should be prescribed a series of life-altering puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, ultimately, receive a double mastectomy at the age of 14.

Clementine is a female who suffered from a complex, multi-faceted array of mental health symptoms as a child and adolescent.

She is also a survivor of multiple instances of sexual abuse as a child and adolescent, something that was never explored, addressed, or discussed by Defendants in the course of their purported treatment.

Her presentation of symptoms and concerns included, among other things, anxiety, depression, autism, undiagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), potential bipolarism, as has been suggested by one of her psychiatrists, ongoing confusion regarding her gender, and eventually psychosis (including audio and visual hallucinations), panic attacks, and paranoia.

Her family also has a lengthy history of mental health issues. She needed psychotherapy to evaluate, assess, and treat her complex co-morbid mental health symptoms.

Instead, she was fast-tracked onto the conveyor belt of irreversibly damaging puberty blockers (age 12), cross-sex hormones (age 13), and “gender-affirming” surgery (age 14).

Around the age of 11 or 12, likely due at least in part to the sexual abuse she experienced as a young child, Clementine began struggling with the thought of developing into a woman and began to believe that life would be easier if she were a boy.

She expressed as much to her then school counselor in some of her sessions discussing her then-declining mental health, who told Clementine that she was transgender and called her parents to tell them the same.

Clementine’s parents, completely surprised by and unaware of how to handle this supposed diagnosis but wanting to care for their daughter, decided to take Clementine to “the experts,” which led them to the Center for Transyouth Health and Development at Children’s Hospital in Los Angeles and under the care of Dr. Johanna Olson-Kenedy (“Dr. Olson-Kennedy”), the director of the Center and one of the most prominent advocates for so-called pediatric “gender-affirming care” in the country.

Clementine had just turned 12 years old.

Dr. Olson-Kennedy and the team at LA Children’s immediately and unquestioningly “affirmed” Clementine as transgender, and at her very first visit, after mere minutes, Dr. Olson Kennedy diagnosed Clementine with gender dysphoria and recommended surgical implantation of puberty blockers.

Dr. Olson-Kennedy performed no mental health assessment. She did not ask about things like past trauma, abuse, or mental health struggles or diagnoses.

She involved no other providers or health care professionals in this purported gender dysphoria diagnosis and recommendation for puberty blockers.

Instead, she simply took a handful of platitudinal statements from a scared, confused, and traumatized barely-12-year-old girl to give a life-altering diagnosis and handed her the prescription pad.

In short, it took Dr. Olson-Kennedy and the team at LA Children’s a single visit to send Clementine down a life-altering, traumatic, body-disfiguring, and irreversibly damaging path of transgender medicalization.

continued … 🧵
Under Defendants’ “care,” from the ages of 12 to 19, Clementine had a puberty blocker surgically inserted into her left arm at age 12, was prescribed “gender-affirming” cross-sex hormones from ages 13 to 19, had a “gender-affirming” double mastectomy at only 14 years old, and was urged to get a “gender-affirming” hysterectomy as a 17-year-old.

She did not experience any long-term relief from these gender dysphoria “treatments.” Rather, her mental health progressively declined, as she proceeded into depression, anxiety, psychosis, hallucinations, self-harm, and suicidal ideation and even attempted suicide, none of which she had experienced prior to her gender medicalization.

Defendants also failed to obtain informed consent, which, for this type of “treatment,” is a process requiring an extended period of time and complete assessment of the patient’s mental health. It involves extensive discussion of the known and unknown risks of the proposed treatments and ensuring that the patient and parents understand and fully appreciate the long-term consequences and effects, such as the loss of the ability to ever conceive a child or breastfeed one.

It requires discussion of alternative methods of treatment. It should additionally entail discussion of the evidence base, or lack thereof, to support the off-label use of the proposed “treatments.”

None of the above was discussed or explained in Clementine’s case. In fact, the opposite occurred. Defendants obscured and concealed important information and failed to disclose the significant health risks associated with a female taking high doses of harmful male hormone drugs and puberty blockers.

Even worse, Defendants made numerous material misrepresentations in order to convince Clementine’s parents to agree to puberty blockers, such as assuring them that puberty blockers are “completely reversible,” and cross-sex hormones, including asserting that Clementine would commit suicide if she did not begin taking testosterone.

Defendants’ coercion, concealment, misrepresentations, and manipulation are appalling and represent an egregious breach of the standard of care. This misconduct also constitutes fraud, malice, and oppression.
Eventually, through mental health care she began receiving at the end of high school and the natural desistance of gender dysphoria as one progresses into adulthood, Clementine realized
that she was not “trans.”

She was a vulnerable child suffering from untreated PTSD from traumatic
events in her childhood. Consequently, she detransitioned and no longer identifies as a male. But the damage has been done, and it is profound.

As a result of Defendants’ so-called “gender-affirming care,” Clementine now has deep physical and emotional wounds, severe regrets, and distrust of the medical system.

She has suffered physically, socially, neurologically, and psychologically. Her voice has permanently deepened. Her female body did not develop, and she has a very masculine body structure. Her fertility is almost certainly destroyed from the combination of years on puberty blockers and testosterone. And even if she could conceive and deliver a child, she would not be able to breastfeed because her healthy breasts were removed when she was only 14.

And she has to see the scars from that unnecessary surgery every day. She has experienced vaginal atrophy, and her sex life has been materially impacted. She is also at risk for bone-related problems later in life. In short, her body has been profoundly damaged in ways that can never be repaired.

Furthermore, her mental health condition is now also damaged by medical abuse trauma, for which she will likely need long-term mental health care as a result.
Read 39 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
New research provides strong evidence that DEI training is producing extraordinary psychological harm.

The New York Times and Bloomberg were offered this story and jumped on it enthusiastically, only to have editors shut it down at the 11th hour.

We are the media now.

In experiments in which participants were exposed to ‘anti-racist’ DEI rhetoric quoted directly from Ibram X Kendi and Robin DiAngelo, it induced baseless attributions of hostility and a willingness to punish percieved perpetrators — despite no evidence of wrongdoing or any racism whatsoever. 🧵Image
Image
Similarly, in research on anti-Islamophobia, and anti-casteism pedagogy — taken directly from training materials — NCRI and Rutgers found similar results.

These anti-oppressive pedagogies reliably produce increases of 20-30% in hostile attributions and desires for punishment with no evidence of wrongdoing. 

Some of the results, especially in the anti-casteism work, produced extraordinary harms: ~30% increases in agreement with Hitler quotes where the word ‘Jew’ was exchanged for upper caste members.Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(