Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 17, 2025 15 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🔥Trump Administration files response to Venezuela terrorists filing earlier today asking for details on flight. 1/
3/ WHOA! Image
3/ DOJ's position is oral ruling was NOT a governing injunction. Cites case law. Also, DOJ acknowledges oral order was broader than minute order and says minute order controls. Image
Image
Image
4/ Sounds like Trump may have given a separate order beyond the Proclamation. Image
5/ Once outside territory they were already "removed" DOJ argues so they didn't violate TRO that said you can't "remove" them. Image
6/ I'm confused here if the DOJ is saying removed based on Aliens Act but not Proclamation or NOT Aliens Act. Image
7/ DOJ won't tell Court what happened after outside airspace because concerns foreign relations. Image
8/ DOJ now brings Article II point which I saw as being strongest for the "turning around the planes" aspect of the dispute. Image
Image
Image
9/ In short: "With all due respect, your Honor, Step Off!" Image
10/ Link. Concluding/Overall thoughts to follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
1/ And Judge counters: Hell no! Image
12/ Judge likely noted that the filing did NOT say the two flights were outside of US Territory AFTER the minute order was entered. Note the word choice: "As to any flights..."Image
13/ He will also likely asked if the 3rd flight involved Aliens Enemy Act removal or other removal because Trump could have ordered them removed/made same findings just not in the proclamation.
14/ Judge is going to be pissed over several things...more later.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Jun 25
Alito throws some subtle shade to the lawfare in the Temporary Protective Status case. Image
2/ That "Nevertheless, lower courts," sentence has herculean restraint! Image
3/ Reminder: The lower courts didn't give a dang! Image
Read 4 tweets
May 26
THREADETTE: SCOTUS issued opinion today in case where group representing immigration judges sought to challenge in federal court rule that they had to get a supervisor's approval before speaking re immigration issues. 1/
2/ The full opinion (which is short) and Justice Thomas's concurrence are must-reads because IMNSHO they are SCOTUS first group slap to rouge judges. supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf…
3/ Full court signed on to this line: Image
Read 7 tweets
May 5
🔥Pending before SCOTUS right now is petition for cert in what is one of most consequential constitutional cases related to liberty in the form of a free-market. And yet, few have taken notice of the case. In short, EPA decided who to give market share to based on "equity." 1/ Image
2/ Article here by colleague at @NCLAlegal washingtontimes.com/news/2026/may/…
@NCLAlegal 3/3 Here is the docket for those interested. It is truly appalling unelected bureaucrats are deciding whose business to kill--including taking their market share to give to so-called disadvantaged folks who never built business w/ sweat equity.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 30
THREADETTE: SCOTUS's decision yesterday in Callais case striking down Louisiana's unconstitutional race-based districts prompted voters who brought challenge to immediately file an application asking Court to rush case back to district court so the districts could be redrawn. 1/Image
Image
Image
Image
2/ The losers who want to continue to discriminate based on race in district mapping oppose sending case back to district court on expedited basis. And Alito ordered them to respond by 4 p.m. Fact that pro-discrimination side wants to delay case with midterms around corner makes Image
3/ me wonder, given @MZHemingway reporting in Alito, that Leftist justices dragged feet in Dobbs, holding up opinion by delaying dissent and THEN unnecessarily citing another SCOTUS decision that had not yet been released, whether the Leftist justices did the same here BUT
Read 6 tweets
Apr 14
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Judge Boasberg gets spanked! Image
2/ Image
3/antagonistic jurisdiction! Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(