🧵🧵Indivisible is definitely the ring leader of the Tesla Takedown domestic terrorism movement. They are the main organizers, they host the weekly calls to lay out their plans.
Today was one of them. The call was one hour and ten mins and had some very interesting moments.
I see that today all over their messaging it says nonviolent because of the charges that were brought by Pam Bondi so they seem a little spooked.
Anyway, I listened to their entire organizing call for the 500 protests they are trying to organize for 3/29.
Truly dystopian stuff.
1. One of the speakers is a federal employee who belongs to the American Federation of Government Employees Union.
For that that don’t remember, they are one of the six groups that teamed up on December 19, 2024, to take down Trump. Marc Elias launched Civil Service Strong. The press release calls the firm a coalition of civil society institutions and organizations, including 2.2 million federal government civil servants.
She spoke on the call to rally protesters all across the country to make their voices heard.
So I just connected Indivisible with Civil Service Strong because it’s all tied together.
One of the most interesting parts of this one hour call was that Jasmine Crockett came on to speak because clearly she is part of this entire takedown Elon Musk apparatus.
A sitting member of Congress is working with Indivisible to take down an American car company and destroy its owner.
This was my favorite speaker, the independent journalist and hacker who tells us the entire point of these organized protests are to tank Tesla stock.
Not a lawyer but this seems illegal to me.
Other prominent organizations involved and mentioned in the call:
Planet Over Profit
New Republic
50501
John Cusak
Civil Liberties Defense Center
Association of Flight Attendants
Troublemakers
Joan Donovan - original organizer of this entire project
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵🧵The 65 Project is a polarizing force in American politics, targeting conservative lawyers with ethics complaints and public shaming to deter representation of Trump and similar causes.
They operate just like the rest of the NGO mafia, they attack their opponents and try to debank, deplatform, disbar and destroy anyone who stands in their way.
Now that President Trump is in office, The 65 Project needs to be the subject of a DOJ investigation.
1/ What is the 65 Project?
The 65 Project is a campaign launched in 2022 under the umbrella of Law Works, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focused on promoting the rule of law. Its stated mission is to hold accountable lawyers who "undermine democracy" by filing frivolous lawsuits or engaging in efforts to challenge election results, particularly those tied to Trump’s 2020 election challenges.
The group is named after the 65 lawsuits filed by Trump’s legal team post-2020 election, most of which were dismissed.
Key Goal: The 65 Project seeks to file ethics complaints against attorneys, pursue their disbarment, and publicly shame them to deter future legal representation of similar causes.
Leadership: Michael Teter, an Utah-based attorney, serves as the director and has personally signed nearly 100 ethics complaints against Trump-aligned lawyers. He is also a well connected Democrat.
The project operates as a fiscally sponsored initiative of Law Works, meaning it doesn’t have independent nonprofit status but relies on Law Works for tax-exempt fundraising.
While the group claims to protect democracy, what they actually do is engage in "lawfare" to intimidate conservative lawyers, potentially chilling free speech and the right to legal representation.
2/ Who Are the Organizers Behind the 65 Project?
The 65 Project has ties to prominent Democratic operatives, with one key figure standing out:
- David Brock: A well-known Democratic strategist and founder of Media Matters for America, Brock is reported to have helped launch the 65 Project. His involvement links the group to a broader network of left-wing advocacy organizations. Brock has a history of creating "dark money" groups to influence political outcomes, raising questions about the 65 Project’s impartiality.
- Michael Teter: As director, Teter is the public face of the 65 Project. He has been accused of unprofessional conduct in filing boilerplate ethics complaints, though no disciplinary actions against him have been confirmed.
- Law Works: The parent organization provides legal and financial infrastructure. Its broader mission is less controversial, but its sponsorship of the 65 Project has drawn scrutiny for enabling partisan activities under a nonprofit guise.
The involvement of Brock, one of the most polarizing figures in politics, suggests the 65 Project aligns with Democratic Party, and its nonpartisan framing is gascon gaslighting. The lack of transparency about other organizers limits a full picture.
🧵🧵The Islamist Infiltration of American Campuses — How SJP and MSA Channel the Muslim Brotherhood’s Ideology
1/ For decades, American universities have unwittingly hosted the Muslim Brotherhood’s soft-power machine, primarily through two student groups:
•Muslim Students Association (MSA)
•Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP)
This isn’t just activism. It’s infiltration.
2/ Let’s start with the Muslim Students Association (MSA).
Founded in 1963 at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, the MSA was the first formal Muslim Brotherhood front in the U.S. It was seeded by Brotherhood members who migrated from Egypt and South Asia.
3/ The Brotherhood’s long-term strategy, outlined in the infamous “Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America” (seized by the FBI), calls for “civilizational jihad” — undermining the West from within by infiltrating institutions.
Quote from the memo:
“The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”
The MSA was the first tool built for that purpose — and its legacy remains intact.
MSA quickly expanded, spawning chapters at over 600 colleges. Its mission statements often focus on “spirituality,” but early internal documents showed a Brotherhood-style emphasis on political Islam and advancing global Islamic unity (ummah) through activism.
🧵🧵The Muslim Brotherhood’s Shadow Empire in America — Soft Power, Mosque Networks, and Terror Links
(1/) This isn’t just a thread about terrorism. It’s about how the Muslim Brotherhood built a parallel power structure inside the U.S. using soft power — education, real estate, nonprofits, and lawfare — to infiltrate and radicalize from within.
(2/) What is “soft power”?
For the Muslim Brotherhood, it means:
•Controlling religious spaces
•Influencing youth identity
•Shaping political narratives
•Silencing moderates
•Operating under the protection of religious freedom laws
Not bombs. Not bullets. But control.
The 1991 Brotherhood Strategy Memo, uncovered by the FBI, spells it out:
“The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.”
It outlines a stealth war — by using the system against itself.
How do they do it? Easy, they use our infrastructure against us.
They built 3 key institutions:
•NAIT: Holds title to over 300 mosques in America
•ISNA: Provides national legitimacy, PR cover
•MSA: Recruits and indoctrinates youth on campuses
All were founded or led by Muslim Brotherhood-linked figures.
(3/) NAIT (North American Islamic Trust): Created in 1973 to buy and control mosque properties. It gives Brotherhood ideologues veto power over:
•Who speaks
•Who leads
•What doctrine is taught
Property = power.
Leadership ties:
•Dr. Gaddoor Saidi, NAIT chairman: Named unindicted co-conspirator in 2008 terror finance case
•Dr. Bassam Osman, board member: Previously linked to Quranic Literacy Institute, whose assets were frozen for Hamas connections
🧵🧵 Why EPIC in Texas is evidence of a more nefarious and calculated plan to infiltrate and subvert Western culture.
Le t’s start with the Holy Land Foundation (HLF) trial, wrapping up in 2008. Five leaders were convicted for funneling $12.4 million to Hamas, a Muslim Brotherhood (MB) offshoot, under the guise of charity. The big lesson? Radical Islamists can cloak agendas in legitimate fronts—here, a U.S.-based NGO. Evidence included the 1991 MB memo, “An Explanatory Memorandum,” outlining a “civilizational jihad” to erode Western culture from within via institutions, education, and settlement. It’s our anchor: a plan to shift perceptions and power, subtly, over decades.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s Playbook - 1991 Memo Details
That memo, penned by MB operative Mohamed Akram, called for a “grand Jihad” to “destroy Western civilization” by infiltrating its systems—education, media, law. Tactics? Build organizations, educate Muslims, leverage democracy to “settle” Islam. Another document, “The Project” (1982), echoed this globally: use propaganda, alliances, and immigration. Over 25 years (2000–2025), these ideas morphed from theory to action, with NGOs and money as tools. It’s less about bombs, more about influence—Israel and the Middle East as key perception targets.
Goal Posts Move - From Violence to Narrative (2000–2025)
In 2000, radical Islamism meant Al-Qaeda—9/11 (2001) defined it. Israel was a U.S. ally; the Middle East, a Cold War proxy zone. Post-9/11, the MB pivoted. The Arab Spring (2011) saw them grab power (Egypt’s Morsi), then adapt after his 2013 fall. Violence waned; influence waxed. By 2025, goal posts shifted: destabilize via culture, not just regimes. Perceptions flipped—Israel’s now an “oppressor” (Pew 2023: 41% unfavorable U.S. view, up from 26% in 2001), the Middle East a victim of “Zionism.” MB media (Al Jazeera) and NGOs (CAIR) drove this slow burn.
🧵🧵Highlights from the Cabinet Meeting today.
1. Brooke Rollins discusses the disastrous position the Biden administration has left farmers and those in agriculture. She explained that there has been a 30% increase in input costs and that the previous administration left them with a $50 billion trade deficit even though it was zero when Biden took office and so they are working on overcoming those issues so that we can be comfortable in the quantity and status of our food production
2. Pam Bondi highlighted some of the wins the Trump administration from the Supreme Court this week, which included allowing DEI to stop in our school systems, firing over 16,000 probationary government employees and continuing the deportations under the Alien Enemies Act.
She also explained that they are pursuing the act of domestic terrorism, curled a Tesla and they should have another arrest coming down the pike this week.
The update given by the DOL was quite shocking because they have found that 25,000 people who are over the age of 115 years old were collecting $59 million dollars. 28,000 people between the ages of one years old and five years old have collected $250 million in fraudulent payments and 10,000 people who have not even been born yet have collected $69 million dollars in fraudulent payments.
🧵🧵 Kash Patel released the Manifesto for the Nashville sh**ter.
On April 7, 2025, Kash Patel made a significant move toward transparency by releasing over 1,000 pages of writings from Audrey Hale, the individual responsible for the tragic shooting at The Covenant School in Nashville, Tennessee, on March 27, 2023. The documents, shared exclusively with Megyn Kelly and provided to the House Intelligence Committee, shed a disturbing light about the motives behind the attack that claimed the lives of three 9-year-old students and three adult staff members.
Audrey Hale, a 28-year-old former student of the Christian elementary school, left behind a collection of notebooks, journals, and digital files that authorities initially described as a “manifesto.”
However, the Metro Nashville Police Department (MNPD) and the FBI resisted releasing these materials, citing an ongoing investigation and concerns from victims’ families about publicizing the shooter’s thoughts.
Lawsuits from media outlets, including The Tennessee Star, and public pressure from figures like Kash Patel—then a Trump administration nominee—failed to dislodge the documents during the Biden administration.
The MNPD’s final investigative report, released on April 3, 2025, claimed that no single “manifesto” existed, instead characterizing Hale’s writings as a series of notebooks and media files documenting her planning and personal struggles.
Kelly, argued that this summary downplayed key aspects of Hale’s motivations, particularly her focus on gender identity, prompting accusations of a cover-up driven by political sensitivities.