HHS Secretary Kennedy just upended the bird flu vaccine narrative, revealing a disturbing reality authorities are trying to hide. Why isn’t anyone talking about this?
🧵 THREAD
The USDA wants to vaccinate millions of chickens to stop the bird flu. They claim it’s the ultimate solution, but not everyone’s convinced. RFK Jr., for one, is sounding the alarm.
He’s worried about a big problem: “leaky vaccines.”
Leaky vaccines don’t actually stop a virus from spreading.
Instead, they risk transforming entire flocks into virus mutation factories, churning out new variants like some kind of twisted science experiment gone wrong. All under the guise of health and safety.
"All of my agencies [CDC, NIH, FDA] advise against vaccination of birds because if you vaccinate with a leaky vaccine … you turn those flocks into mutation factories,” Kennedy explained.
“It’s dangerous for human beings to vaccinate the birds…”
Not only does the virus not go away, it actually evolves, adapts, and potentially becomes more deadly.
This isn’t just some wild guess.
History has already shown what happens when viruses mutate thanks to leaky vaccines. It can drive viral evolution, not only allowing pathogens to persist but also making them more infectious and harder to control.
And while Big Pharma and the USDA continue to push leaky vaccines as the “solution,” look at what’s happening in the egg industry:
• Egg prices have skyrocketed to $4.95 per dozen on average with customers in some states seeing prices topping a staggering $10 per dozen.
• A sickening 166 million chickens have been culled in the United States alone.
• The USDA is reporting that egg prices may jump another 41% in 2025, making what used to be a staple in the American diet sadly out of reach for many.
But here’s the kicker: this virus isn’t even transmitted through eggs or food. So why are we murdering so many chickens and growing fearful of eggs?
Instead of using a leaky vaccine and slaughtering millions of chickens, Kennedy suggests a more level-headed approach:
• Isolate infected flocks
• Let them develop natural immunity
• Use therapeutics to treat and protect healthy birds
“Most of our scientists are against the culling operation. They think that we should be testing therapeutics on those flocks. They should isolate. You should let the disease go with them and identify the birds that survive, which are the birds that probably have a genetic inclination for immunity,” Kennedy explained.
Meanwhile, the government is dumping $1 billion into bird flu measures:
• $500M for “biosecurity”
• $400M for farmers with culled flocks
• $100M for research into vaccines and therapeutics
Despite all of this funding, there’s no relief for Americans in sight. Egg prices remain sky-high and are expected to rise even further.
Why isn’t anyone talking about this disaster?
The real concern is where this all leads. If leaky vaccines fuel viral evolution, what happens when bird flu jumps to humans?
Do they push another rushed vaccine? Will we see more mandates?
This isn’t just about chickens (even though what’s being done to them is downright horrible). It’s about a repeated failed approach to disease control that always leads to the same disastrous outcomes: Big Pharma profits, higher food prices, more unnecessary vaccinations, and a heck of a lot of fear.
The red flags are all around us, and thankfully, RFK Jr. is ringing the warning bell loud and clear. But the question is, will anyone actually pay attention?
These “leaky vaccines” are dangerous. Hardworking farmers are being forced to kill healthy birds, and now the country is facing a major egg crisis. What’s the government doing about it?
Throwing more cash at the problem, doubling down on vaccines, and dodging any real accountability.
How long before history repeats itself?
Thanks for reading!
The information in this article is based on a report originally published by @EpochHealth1. Key details have been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. For the full story and more, visit their website.
In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s murder, another major development has surfaced: two NATO nations now claim Russian drones crossed their airspace.
Martin Armstrong fears it’s a false flag to spark war and force global CBDCs onto the population.
And when it comes to Charlie Kirk’s murder, there is “no going back,” he warns.
Here’s what he believes is coming next.
🧵 THREAD
Over the weekend, a major escalation towards World War 3 occurred—yet again. And understandably, a lot of people just weren’t paying attention to Europe and NATO this weekend… but we need to be.
Why? Because both Poland and Romania have accused Russia of entering their airspace with drones. And the United States has responded to these claims, vowing on Friday to defend “every inch of NATO territory.”
But there are many unanswered questions about this alleged attack. According to economist Martin Armstrong, the consensus is that it was a false flag designed to drum up support for a full fledged war with Russia.
@ArmstrongEcon joins us to discuss.
Economist Martin Armstrong opened by blasting Western strategists for toppling regimes with no plan for what comes next. He drew a straight line from Iraq to today’s Russia policy, warning that the rhetoric has already crossed into dangerous territory.
When Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas says, “Russia’s too big and should be broken up,” Armstrong argued this isn’t about borders, it’s about destruction. Leaders act as if their adversary won’t respond, but anyone under existential threat will use every weapon available—just as a homeowner would reach for a gun if their house were stormed.
Maria piled on, mocking the weekend’s flimsy drone claims and pointing out what looked like duct tape holding it together, while highlighting the “new world order” language out of Brussels. Armstrong said the real driver isn’t security—it’s Europe’s economic collapse pushing escalation, dressed up in a packaged storyline obvious to anyone who is paying attention.
It set the tone for the episode: elites manufacturing consent for a wider conflict, and ignoring the consequences while the public grows more alert as the stakes rise.
Propaganda works. In fact, it’s one of the most powerful invisible forces in modern society.
Professional PR firms create narratives that most people believe, even when they very obviously go against our self-interest. And most people never notice it’s happening.
The COVID vaccine roll out was the largest PR campaign of our lifetime.
*Data based on how often children visited the doctor for each condition*
Instead of investigating the findings, the Oregon Medical Board suspended Dr. Thomas’s license—just days after the study was published. Months later, the study was retracted.
Dr. Paul Thomas isn’t the only one who faced swift punishment for publishing inconvenient science.
Other doctors have faced similar consequences for exposing the same pattern.
The question is: Why are doctors being punished simply for comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated kids?
🧵 THREAD
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
The pharmaceutical playbook has always relied on one thing: Public Relations.
From fake incubator stories during the Gulf War to anti-sunlight fearmongering by dermatologists, the strategy has been the same: create panic, then sell the cure.
Charlie Kirk Shooting Suspect Revealed: Here’s What His Ammunition Said
Tyler Robinson, 22, not a student at Utah Valley University, is the man authorities now believe took the fatal shot that ended Charlie Kirk’s life at just 31 years old.
Investigators say Robinson had recently grown more political, mentioned Kirk by name, and openly opposed his beliefs.
After the killing, Robinson reached out to a family friend with a confession.
He had also been communicating extensively on Discord, a group-chat platform popular among gamers, where investigators now confirm he was active, Fox News reports.
Authorities also revealed the disturbing words engraved on the ammunition.
At the close of the press conference, Utah Governor Spencer Cox grew visibly emotional as he ended with words from Charlie Kirk himself. It was an eye-watering moment.
America would do well to remember the truths Charlie Kirk never stopped preaching.
“When people stop talking, that’s when you get violence.”
“The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong. The only way out of the labyrinth of suffering is to forgive. Welcome without judgment, love without condition, forgive without limit. Always forgive your enemies. Nothing annoys them so much.”
“When things are moving very fast and people are losing their minds, it’s important to stay grounded. Turn off your phone, read scripture, spend time with friends, and remember, Internet fury is not real life.”
“When you stop having a human connection with someone you disagree with, it becomes a lot easier to commit violence. What we as a culture have to get back to is being able to have reasonable agreement where violence is not an option.”
Joe Rogan Reacts to Charlie Kirk’s Death, Delivers Chilling Prediction
“One of two things is going to happen.”
🧵 THREAD
The news of @CharlieKirk11’s tragic death has shaken many in this country to the core — myself included.
Seeing the close-up footage of his gunshot wound to the neck was so graphic and gruesome that many people initially thought it was AI-generated — only to learn later it was very real.
Kirk was arguably the most influential political figure in the world under the age of 35. He had a bright future ahead of him, a loving wife, two young children, and a legitimate shot at becoming president one day.
All of that was robbed from him on September 10, 2025.
Twenty-four hours later, we are all still grieving Kirk’s death, but the latest episode of The Joe Rogan Experience just aired, capturing Rogan’s raw first reaction.
The two-minute clip below takes you back to the moment we all first heard the devastating news.
Rogan buried his face in his hands, stared off to the side, and sat visibly shaken as he tried to process the news.
His guest, Charlie Sheen, was disturbed too, saying, “He [Charlie] doesn’t deserve that,” adding that he was “murdered for having a different ideology from somebody else.”