Post

More from @VigilantFox

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 6

Grok AI says COVID vaccines are “absolutely safe and effective.”

Meanwhile, other bots are literally telling people how to end their lives.

This isn’t a glitch—it’s part of the plan. A look inside the mindset of the people designing the systems that will soon decide what you’re allowed to say, believe, and do.

Now, those same people want to guide you through mass unemployment with “universal high income.”

So ask yourself: is this really who you want in charge of your money, your voice, and your children’s future?

🧵 THREAD

To give you a brief overview, the UN, WEF, international bankers, and technocrats are planning to collapse the world as we know it through a planned demolition.

Their goal is to rebuild into the digital age. You may have heard it called the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Golden Age—all the names that are far more palatable than the coming reality, which will see everyone locked in a digital prison of 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, and slavery. And it will indeed be slavery, because after the AI takeover, humans will be left with no work, no money, and no purpose.

The proposed solution to this is “free” money. A universal basic income—or universal high income, as Elon Musk calls it. It will be a nominal amount of digital currency paid to you by the powers that be, as long as you comply with what they tell you. If their plan succeeds, you won’t be able to survive without their digital currency. That is their plan and they’ve clearly outlined it in multiple texts.

@zeeemedia reported on this in depth two years ago. You can watch that report here. It’s vitally important.

So, how when can we expect this plan to come to fruition? What would you say if we told you it’s already here?

Today, we’re digging into the worldwide rollout of universal basic income, what that means for humanity, and what you can do to prepare and fight back.

Tonight’s report opened with a look back at Andrew Yang’s push for universal basic income (UBI).

In 2019 and 2020, the public wasn’t ready to embrace something so sweeping. But once technocrats gained serious influence over global policy and the digital future, the landscape changed. What was once dismissed as a fringe idea has quietly moved into the mainstream, reshaped as part of a broader global transformation.

That shift became easier to grasp after hearing how many tech elites envision humanity’s future. Yuval Noah Harari, for example, once said people will be drugged and distracted because their lives will be “meaningless.” Remarks like that revealed how the architects of the coming system view the average person—not as empowered individuals, but as managed subjects.

The pandemic years only intensified that picture. What had long been called a conspiracy—including the Great Reset—became visible in plain sight, embedded in the proposals and language of global institutions. A “mass awakening” followed.

One idea connected it all: digital ID. Once identity is tied to behavior and access to money, control isn’t imposed—it’s embedded. The result is a shift toward a social-credit-style model, where participation depends on compliance.

Watch the full report: 👇
rumble.com/v72nhmy-lockst…

Read 12 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 6

In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.

Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.

“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.

In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come to [him], and they’d bring [him] video tapes of their [formerly healthy] children. And they’re all about the age of [Scarborough’s] son or younger. Something happened in 1989!”

Twenty years later, it’s hard to ignore that the mainstream media never airs segments like this anymore.

Did the evidence change... or something else? 🧵

Most people have absolutely no idea how much public-relations machinery shapes what they believe about health.

PR campaigns don’t just change opinions, they change language in the process.

And when language changes, memories and ideas seem to disappear—including things we used to openly acknowledge, like vaccine-induced brain inflammation and neurological injury.

Today, those concepts barely exist in public vocabulary, but just decades ago they were recognized everywhere.

The shift happens slowly. That’s how the tactic is so successful. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.

For example, take a look at this 1983 debate that took place on the largest talk show in America. A conversation like this would never, ever happen on TV today.

This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-vaccine-…

Read 31 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 5

A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.

ACIP just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation.

For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.

Here are the three voting members who still insist every child needs a hepatitis B shot at birth. Remember their names. 🧵

Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.

Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak.

Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”

Video: @Holden_Culotta

The decision to end the universal hepatitis B vaccination recommendation is a huge deal because the three-shot series is required for public school attendance in nearly every state, and most states base their mandates directly on ACIP recommendations.

Today’s decision instantly places the decades-old school requirement on unstable ground.

Read 7 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 4

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public school in virtually every state.

Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed on babies their first day of life?

Doctors don’t have a valid answer. If you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.

Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby, as long as the mother is negative. However, the US still recommends that every child be injected on the first day of life.

Make it make sense.

Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.

But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level?

Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you. 🧵

The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time.

At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.

Moreover, if you look at the 20–24 (light blue) and 15–19 (orange) age groups, you’ll notice that the rates of acute hepatitis B were falling long before the vaccination could ever be given credit, because the vaccine would not have an impact on 20–24-year-olds until around 2011–2012, or until 2006–2007 for 15–19-year-olds, Dr. Nevison noted.

Read 7 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 3

Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China?

It sounds far too dark, but it’s true.

Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time.

But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner.

China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story.

And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America?

This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵

Most people think organ donation is a simple act of generosity. Check the box. Save a life. End of story.

But behind the scenes, a series of federal investigations has exposed something far more disturbing. And there’s no generosity in sight.

The system meant to protect those barely clinging to life is failing—and in some cases, it’s a catastrophic failure.

Take Jenny’s story for example. Jenny was declared brain dead when she wasn’t at all. Terrifyingly, she was stuck inside her body, fully aware of everything that was happening—and being said—around her.

Including a doctor telling med students that her husband was “unreasonable” for not signing her organs—and her life—away.

Thankfully he didn’t or Jenny wouldn’t be here today to share her story.

What is brain death? There is no standard.

The ethical line between life and death is not where you think it is.

Modern medicine has slowly reshaped how we think—and feel—about death.

Tools like CPR, ventilators, and organ transplantation have created the belief that death is negotiable—something to be delayed, managed, or “conquered.”

That belief built enormous trust. And with that trust came enormous profit.

Organ transplants can cost a staggering $446,000–$1.9 million each. In the US, healthcare now consumes 17.6% of the economy.

Where scarcity meets profit, exploitation always follows.

Always.

Read 27 tweets

Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

Dec 2

The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public schools in 46 states.

Hepatitis B is transmitted via needles or sexual contact, yet this vaccine is pushed on babies on their first day of life.

Why?

We finally have some answers.

Here’s the real reason every newborn is forced to get it—and why that could finally be changing. 🧵

For decades, @MidwesternDoc has tried to answer the question:

Why do we inject a vaccine meant for adult risk groups into every newborn?

The truth reveals a story of shaky science, ignored safety signals, and hidden agendas.
midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-is-every…

@MidwesternDoc The debate isn’t new. The hepatitis B vaccine has been hotly debated for years.

But the debate is getting a little more, shall we say, weird.

Check out this clip from @HighWireTalk featuring none other than Dr. Demetre Daskalakis.

Read 28 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @VigilantFox

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!