Ruth Deyermond Profile picture
Mar 22 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Absolutely agree with Amb. Fried that this is very damaging - to the US's credibility and national interest. But the idea that this will damage the US position in talks with Russia suggests that these are genuine negotiations. I really don't think they are. 🧵
Everything we can hear and see and everything we know about the dominant figures in the Trump administration indicates that the talks are being seen as a mechanism for building an informal US-Russia alliance. Attempting to carve up Ukraine is part of how this is being done.
As I've said before, it looks very much as if the peace deal that the Trump administration is trying to negotiate with the Kremlin is between the US and Russia, not Russia and Ukraine. For them, Ukraine seems to be entirely expendable. So does the rest of Europe.
The Trump admin's engagement with the world seems based on a half-baked version of Realism 101, in which the world is divided up into 19th century spheres of influence but also in which an economically and ideologically allied US and Russia are balanced against China.
Of course, the Russian government's view of international relations doesn't allow for alliances of equals. Competing great powers: yes; alliances based on (rough) equality and mutual respect: no. You're either lord or vassal; puppet master or puppet.
The Trump admin is pro-Russia; speaks deferentially - never critically - about Putin; is hostile to Zelensky; hostile to allies; willing to see 100s of Ukrainians killed to coerce Kyiv; wants to lift sanctions, readmit Russia to the G7/8. It has subordinated US policy to Moscow.
The Kremlin appears to think, understandably, that it is now master and the US is now the vassal. That's why Witkoff was kept waiting for 8 hours by Putin; it's why Russia bombed Ukrainian infrastructure immediately after Trump said they'd agreed an infrastructure ceasefire. Image
Image
Image
By publicly humiliating the White House, Putin is demonstrating to the rest of the world that he has power over Trump and thus over the whole of the US. By trying to recreate a world of great powers, the Trump administration has made the US the subordinate of China's subordinate.
Those in and around the White House who are likely to both see and care that thanks to the Trump admin the US is looking more and more like Russia's subordinate - Rubio, formerly hawkish GOP senators - are seemingly in too weak a position to do anything to change course.
Trump may not know or understand how badly he is being humiliated by Putin; if he does understand, he has a surprisingly high tolerance for it, which seems inconsistent with other aspects of his personality. Others in the White House may simply not care.
It's unclear whether Trump and those making White House policy know that their approach to negotiations with Russia is humiliating Trump personally and the US as a whole. But its clear to others, presumably including adversaries, as well as former allies. China must be delighted.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ruth Deyermond

Ruth Deyermond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ruth_deyermond

Mar 7
“Do you still believe [Putin] when he tells you he wants peace?” Trump: “You know, I believe him, I believe him, I think we’re doing very well with Russia […] I’m finding it more difficult, frankly to deal with Ukraine.” 🧵
Trump’s claim he’s “strongly considering” sanctions against Russia needs to be viewed in the context of this comment and the many other similar things he's said in the past. Penalising Russia is not something he's ever wanted to do, whatever Russia has done.
Maybe the Trump team decided they need to give the impression Trump isn't as pro-Russian as he's now widely seen to be (though they're obviously happy for the whole admin to sound anti-Ukrainian). But as soon as you get Trump in front of a camera, he'll say this sort of thing.
Read 5 tweets
Feb 28
This is a generally excellent thread, but this is not correct as far as Russia is concerned - Trump has been highly consistent in his approach to Russia since before his 1st term (though the approach isn't internally coherent). 🧵
Trump has *always* spoken and acted as if, in his words, "getting along with Russia" is one of his foreign policy priorities. This is not something on which he has ever changed position, and there is no reason to think he will do so now or in the future.
In term 1, his ability to improve relations with Russia - by giving the Kremlin what it wanted - was limited by his own foreign policy/defence appointees often having a very different view from him, and by Congress (e.g. Congress passing CAATSA to stop him lifting sanctions).
Read 20 tweets
Feb 14
Lots of talk about "spheres of influence" in the context of the Trump admin's novel approach to foreign policy and their apparent plan to hand some/all of Ukraine to Russia, which is very keen on the "spheres of influence" idea. It's a non-starter for both Russia and the US 🧵
The idea that an International Liberal Order - much hated by Russia and others, though always more of an aspiration than a reality - can be replaced by a return to 19th century great power politics, where the US, Russia, and China carve up the world between them, is delusional.
One reason there isn't going to be a new international order grounded in spheres of influence is because the US government is currently doing absolutely everything in its power to kill off its own sphere of influence.
Read 20 tweets
Feb 13
"Over 4 years [of Trump's presidency], there was no Russian aggression." Er, not quite. 🧵
Throughout Trump's 1st term, Russian aggression continued in Eastern Ukraine, killing hundreds of civilians and hundreds, maybe thousands, of Ukrainian soldiers defending their country. @OKhromeychuk's brother was killed during Trump's time in office. Image
What did Trump say about the ongoing Russian aggression in Eastern Ukraine in his 1st term? Nothing. He never, in his entire 1st term in office acknowledged the fact that Russia was committing crimes in Ukraine.
Read 17 tweets
Feb 12
As was always highly likely, the Trump administration has given Russia what it wanted on Ukraine's NATO membership and Ukraine's borders. It's also making it clear that it has no interest in Ukraine's security.
This is, first and most importantly, a disaster for Ukraine, but it's also catastrophically bad for European and US security. The US and some in Europe will tell themselves that this is about the US sensibly reprioritising on security. But Putin will see it as capitulation to him
The US now runs the serious risk of looking to Russia and China as if it's weaker than Russia. That may or may not bother everyone making decisions in the Trump administration, but it should certainly bother any American who cares about the security and future of their country.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 20
A few quick thoughts on the reporting and the reality of the Trump administration’s foreign policy.🧵
Both US and European news media are likely to talk a lot about the “unpredictability” of Trump’s foreign policy as if it’s some kind of strategy. This is misleading – Trump foreign policy wasn’t and isn’t unpredictable, it’s incoherent.
Trump 1 policy was incoherent because what Trump said and did often didn’t align with his own administration (not just career State Dept people but his own appointees). And, of course, we could see very little of what Trump and his inner circle were doing behind closed doors.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(