I see a lot of articles saying how President Trump is attacking law firms in Washington DC because he is vindictive. When in fact, it has nothing to do with being vindictive, and everything to do with the fact that they are acting like an extension of the Democratic Party.
This web shows how elite law firms in DC have become de facto political actors, coordinating with bureaucrats, Democratic campaigns, and activist groups to advance one side’s agenda while insulating allies from legal consequences.
1. Perkins Coie
Partisan Alignment: Strongly Democratic
Key Players: Marc Elias, Michael Sussmann
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the Clinton campaign and DNC to create the Steele Dossier.
•Michael Sussmann was indicted for allegedly lying to the FBI about the source of Alfa Bank/Trump server claims (acquitted, but case exposed coordination between Clinton-linked lawyers and the intelligence community).
•Through Marc Elias, aggressively litigated to change election laws in battleground states pre-2020 (e.g., mail-in ballot rules, signature matching, ballot curing).
•Litigated against voter ID laws and redistricting efforts favoring GOP, using courts to alter rules under the guise of civil rights.
2. Elias Law Group
Partisan Alignment: 100% Democratic
Key Player: Marc Elias (founder, formerly at Perkins Coie)
Involved In:
•Election Lawfare:
•Filed hundreds of lawsuits between 2020–2024 aimed at changing ballot deadlines, preventing voter roll purges, and invalidating state-level election reforms.
•Sued states that passed voter integrity laws (Georgia, Texas, Arizona).
•Legal and strategic support for efforts to disqualify Trump from ballots under the 14th Amendment (Section 3).
3. WilmerHale
Partisan Alignment: Center-left establishment
Key Players: Robert Mueller, Jamie Gorelick
Involved In:
•Russiagate:
•Mueller was a WilmerHale partner before becoming special counsel.
•Several senior lawyers on Mueller’s team (Aaron Zebley, James Quarles) came from WilmerHale.
•Created a direct pipeline from a private DC firm to a politically charged investigation.
•WilmerHale defended companies and figures potentially affected by the Mueller investigation—raising questions about impartiality.
4. Latham & Watkins
Partisan Alignment: Progressive-leaning, deep resistance ties
•Litigated against Trump’s immigration, environmental, and regulatory rollbacks.
•Supported amicus briefs in support of January 6 prosecutions.
•Close ties to Biden DOJ officials (Ruemmler has known connections to current White House legal networks).
5. Covington & Burling
Partisan Alignment: Deep Obama/Biden ties
Key Players: Eric Holder, Lanny Breuer
Involved In:
•Russiagate/Deep State Entrenchment:
•Holder and Breuer returned to Covington after serving in the Obama DOJ.
•Firm has represented major tech and surveillance companies with ties to federal investigations.
•Defended figures in the intelligence community during investigations into FISA abuse and surveillance.
6. Debevoise & Plimpton
Partisan Alignment: Institutional left
Key Player: Mary Jo White (Obama SEC Chair), Andrew Ceresney
Involved In:
•Representing Hunter Biden in federal tax and firearms-related investigations.
•Helped negotiate controversial plea agreement that collapsed in 2023.
•Close ties to DOJ officials overseeing investigations of Hunter Biden. Scrutiny over sweetheart deals and unusual coordination.
7. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
Partisan Alignment: Progressive legal elite
Key Players: Jeh Johnson (Obama DHS), Loretta Lynch (Obama AG)
Involved In:
•Represented progressive groups in redistricting and voting rights lawsuits.
•No comparable representation for free speech or conservative plaintiffs, reinforcing political asymmetry.
•Consulted by Democratic-aligned NGOs on how to frame post-2020 election audit challenges as “threats to democracy.”
8. Jenner & Block
Partisan Alignment: J6-focused, anti-Trump
Key Players: Donald Verrilli (Obama SG), Ian Gershengorn
Involved In:
•January 6 Committee Staffing:
•Provided legal support and volunteers to the J6 Committee.
•Ties to lawfare efforts to charge Trump advisors and allies.
•Worked behind the scenes with groups like Lawfare Blog and Brookings to craft legal theories around “insurrection” and “disqualification.”
The judge who Amir Ali, who became a citizen in 2019 and appointed by Biden is one of the most radical judges on the bench. Biden appointed him so he could be the first Arab American to be a district court judge.
Today this judge said Trump must pay out 4 billion in foreign aide.
He was handpicked and promoted heavily by American Justice Alliance.
🧵Let’s take a little look at this dark money group that put over 40 judges on the bench.
1/ Introducing the Alliance for Justice (AFJ)
Founded in 1979, AFJ is a progressive legal advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. It unites over 140 civil rights, environmental, and social justice organizations, aiming to influence judicial nominations and bolster democratic values.
2/ How AFJ Is Funded
AFJ receives support from major liberal philanthropies, including:
•Ford Foundation – ~$3.36 million
•Atlantic Foundation – ~$2.45 million
•Open Society Foundations (Soros) – ~$1.6 million
Additionally, they’ve received general operating grants from the MacArthur Foundation totaling around $2.77 million over 40 years, where he was the Director.
Plus, recent grant awards included $1M from Ford, $750K from California Wellness, and $500K from JPB Foundation.
They have a little program called
Bolder Advocacy which is a division within AFJ that trains nonprofits on how to:
•Legally engage in lobbying and political advocacy
•Influence legislation or regulations at the local, state, and federal levels
•Mobilize communities and voters to influence public policy
•Challenge government actions in courts and legislatures
In short: it helps progressive-aligned nonprofits become political players—without violating their tax-exempt status.
🧵🧵Let’s expose the Working Families Party that is propping up Mumdani in New York and how they are anything but a grass roots organization for working families.
They are anything but grassroots for the people.
Working Families Party, ACORN, Obama, and the Dark‑Money “Grassroots” Narrative
1. ACORN’s Major Scandals & Controversies
•Embezzlement (1999–2000): ACORN’s co-founder Wade Rathke concealed embezzlement by his brother Dale—nearly $950,000—from the organization. The theft wasn’t disclosed to board members or law enforcement and was quietly resolved via restitution. (Wade and Dale Rathke later stepped down.)
•Voter Registration Fraud (2007–2009): Multiple chapters of ACORN were embroiled in voter registration fraud—such as fake submissions—and legal charges ensued. In Washington State, ACORN paid $25,000 and acknowledged criminal liability if fraud was proven. In Pittsburgh, six employees pled guilty to forgery and other violations.
•Undercover Videos (2009): Conservative activists James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles secretly filmed ACORN staff appearing to give advice on criminal ventures (e.g., tax evasion, human smuggling). Though videos circulated widely, many employees had been misled or were joking, and independent investigations concluded that the tapes were heavily edited and did not show criminal wrongdoing. Still, political backlash was swift—federal contracts ended, funding evaporated, and ACORN declared bankruptcy by 2010.
2. From ACORN to WFP
•The Working Families Party (WFP) was co-founded in 1998 by a coalition that included ACORN, along with Citizen Action of New York and other progressive groups—embedding ACORN’s grassroots organizing ethos into WFP’s DNA.
🧵Why the United States Must Leave the United Nations
The United Nations was established in 1945 as a response to the horrors of World War II. It was built on the ashes of war and genocide, intended as a global forum to prevent future conflict, champion human rights, and safeguard the dignity of nations.
That was the ideal. But nearly eight decades later, the reality is starkly different. The institution that once held the promise of peace has become a sprawling, unaccountable bureaucracy that empowers dictators, undermines democracies, and actively erodes the sovereignty of the very nations that fund it.
No country has been more instrumental in creating and sustaining the United Nations than the United States. From its financial contributions to its military support to the symbolic gesture of hosting its headquarters in New York City, America has been the backbone of the UN for nearly 80 years. And yet, the United Nations has not only failed to serve U.S. interests—it has repeatedly and brazenly worked against them.
In 2023, the United States contributed more than $12.5 billion to the UN system. This included hundreds of millions to its regular budget, over a billion to peacekeeping operations, and billions more in voluntary contributions to agencies like the WHO, UNICEF, and UNDP. These payments represent nearly one-quarter of the UN’s total funding. No other nation comes close. And yet, the return on this massive investment is insult, obstruction, and ideological warfare against American values.
The United States is regularly outvoted in the General Assembly by blocs of countries who share neither our political system nor our moral foundation. Nations that routinely abuse human rights—regimes that crush dissent, jail journalists, and criminalize religious freedom—sit on UN councils with the power to influence international norms and criticize the West. American policy is treated with disdain, our allies are vilified, and our enemies are elevated.
🧵Thread: How the “Teach Palestine” Curriculum Promotes Terrorism by Framing Violence as Resistance
Let’s be clear: this isn’t about education it’s about indoctrination. The Teach Palestine Project, pushed by the Middle East Children’s Alliance (MECA), is injecting classrooms with a narrative that romanticizes terrorism and reframes violent attacks as “resistance.”
Their curriculum doesn’t teach critical thinking it teaches a one-sided propaganda model where Hamas is resistance, Israel is colonialism, and terrorism is justified as liberation. These materials are being presented to U.S. teachers as “social justice education.”
They explicitly glorify the intifadas, violent uprisings that targeted civilians. One resource praises the First Intifada for laying the groundwork for the Second, with the slogan:
“Free Palestine from the river to the sea.”
Instead of condemning attacks on civilians, these lessons teach children to frame those attacks as part of a righteous struggle. That’s not education. That’s radicalization in the classroom.
They rewrite history to erase context.
•No mention of Hamas’s charter.
•No mention of terrorism against Jews before 1948.
•No acknowledgment of peace offers rejected.
Only a constant drumbeat of **“settler colonialism” and resistance by any means.”
🧵 THREAD: The NGOs Behind the “Israel Genocide” Accusation — Who They Are, Who Funds Them, and How Deep the Bias Runs
In August 2025, the International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS) declared Israel’s actions in Gaza “genocide.” But the evidence? It comes from a small network of heavily biased NGOs. Let’s unpack them one by one. 🔽
1️⃣ Who did IAGS cite as proof?
In its resolution, IAGS cited these 7 organizations:
•Amnesty International
•Human Rights Watch (HRW)
•Forensic Architecture (FA)
•DAWN (Democracy for the Arab World Now)
•B’Tselem (Israeli)
•Physicians for Human Rights–Israel (PHRI)
•UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese
Each claims to be independent.
Each has serious credibility issues.
2️⃣ Amnesty International
✅ Called Israel an “apartheid state” (2022)
✅ Declared Israel is committing genocide (2024)
🚩 Criticized for legal sloppiness and selective use of quotes, ignoring Hamas war crimes
🚩 Faced backlash from its own Israel office, which was suspended in 2025 for opposing Amnesty’s Gaza stance
📌 Bottom line: Amnesty’s framing aligns with far-left, decolonial discourse.
🧵The Democratic Socialists of America and their explicit ties to Cuba actually pose a national security threat to America.
It is more than just a radical organization that promotes far left and insane ideology. Their extensive ties to Cuba facilitate potential foreign influence operations and espionage by not only them but by the CCP inside the United States.
Read this thread and ask yourself if perhaps this is the reason communism seems to be spreading amongst the younger generations in America.
What DSA is doing by its own documents:
Platform & program
- The DSA’s adopted platform commits the group to “support normalization of relations with Cuba”, to “stop using economic and financial sanctions to punish other countries, such as Cuba”, to “immediately withdraw from NATO”, and to “abolish USAID, NED, [and] Voice of America.”
- Those planks are not stray tweets; they are the organization’s governing platform.
Named Cuba campaign
- The DSA International Committee runs a live campaign—“Diplomacy, Not FORCE”—explicitly aimed at defeating the FORCE Act (H.R. 450), removing Cuba from the SSOT list, and lifting embargo/travel restrictions.
- The campaign provides letter‑writing tools and talking points to pressure Congress.
Delegations & electeds
- DSA advertises that it “helps organize and promote delegations to Cuba, where activists, organizers, and elected officials” can observe and return to advocate for policy change.
- In September 2022, DSA sent its first official healthcare delegation to Cuba, meeting hospital staff and BioCubaFarma while observing the “Families Code” referendum.
Coalitions that amplify the push
•DSA’s International Committee is listed as a member of ACERE (Alliance for Cuba Engagement and Respect). ACERE has marshaled letters from elected officials and labor leaders urging the White House to remove Cuba from SSOT and ease sanctions.
•DSA is also listed as a member of the National Network on Cuba (NNOC), the long‑standing national solidarity coalition.
Municipal & state pressure.
-This coalition strategy has delivered city‑council resolutions in major metros. In New York City, the Council adopted Resolution 285‑A (June 22, 2023) urging an end to the embargo/travel ban and removal of Cuba from the SSOT list; a follow‑on resolution was re‑introduced in May 2025. NYC‑DSA publicly celebrated the 2023 passage as a DSA‑backed victory. Chicago passed a similar resolution in 2021, part of a national template DSA chapters are told to reproduce.
Scale matters
- DSA describes itself as the largest socialist organization in the United States (≈85,000 members), giving its national campaigns real mobilization capacity around sanctions, delegations, and city‑level actions.